Uploaded image for project: 'WORKTERRA'
  1. WORKTERRA
  2. WT-5534

Define Contribution to be implemented for Health tier

    Details

    • Type: Enhancement
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: High
    • Resolution: Done
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: ACA
    • Labels:
      None
    • Module:
      Exchange
    • Reported by:
      Support
    • Item State:
      Production Complete - Closed
    • Sprint:
      WT Sprint 14

      Description

      Only Flat amount is working for Defined contribution, Client need this to be work for health tier wise amount.

        Attachments

          Activity

          Hide
          neelam.yangal Neelam Yangal (Inactive) added a comment -
          Show
          neelam.yangal Neelam Yangal (Inactive) added a comment - CC: Samir , Amruta Lohiya
          Hide
          neelam.yangal Neelam Yangal (Inactive) added a comment -

          Hi Amruta Lohiya,

          CC: Samir

          I have debugged this issue found that:

          For Employer Defined Contribution we set Grant credit Rule is as no condition. means we will not apply employer contribution to specific plan or benefit type.

          In function : GetCreditPoolEligibleCreditAmount() I found explicitly tier wise amount is removed for Grant Credit Rule ID=4 .

          with comments

          ElseIf creditPoolRuleID = 4 Then 'Rule is No Condition

          'if Rule 1 4 5 7 selected i.e Flat Amount (Flat) consider it only once irrespective of the enrollment of employee
          'As Per Discusiion with Amit on 20th August 2007 No need of Tier Amount
          End if

          Please let us know further action on it.

          Thanks,
          Neelam

          Show
          neelam.yangal Neelam Yangal (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Amruta Lohiya , CC: Samir I have debugged this issue found that: For Employer Defined Contribution we set Grant credit Rule is as no condition. means we will not apply employer contribution to specific plan or benefit type. In function : GetCreditPoolEligibleCreditAmount() I found explicitly tier wise amount is removed for Grant Credit Rule ID=4 . with comments ElseIf creditPoolRuleID = 4 Then 'Rule is No Condition 'if Rule 1 4 5 7 selected i.e Flat Amount (Flat) consider it only once irrespective of the enrollment of employee 'As Per Discusiion with Amit on 20th August 2007 No need of Tier Amount End if Please let us know further action on it. Thanks, Neelam
          Hide
          neelam.yangal Neelam Yangal (Inactive) added a comment -

          Affected file:

          D:\Workterra\WT\WORKTERRAweb\Web\Web Projects\BenAdmin\Areas\Configuration\Controllers\CreditPoolList\CreditPoolEligibilityController.cs
          D:\Workterra\WT\WORKTERRAweb\Web\Web Projects\BenAdmin\Areas\UserDetails\Models\EnrollNow\ElectionSummaryPVModel.cs
          D:\Workterra\WT\WORKTERRAweb\Web\Web Projects\BenAdmin\Areas\Configuration\Models\CreditPoolList\CreditPoolEligibilityModel.cs
          D:\Workterra\WT\WORKTERRAweb\Web\Web Projects\BenAdmin\Areas\Configuration\Views\Configuration\CreditPoolList\CreditPoolEligibility.cshtml

          SP: OES_SP_GetEnrollNowSummary

          Show
          neelam.yangal Neelam Yangal (Inactive) added a comment - Affected file: D:\Workterra\WT\WORKTERRAweb\Web\Web Projects\BenAdmin\Areas\Configuration\Controllers\CreditPoolList\CreditPoolEligibilityController.cs D:\Workterra\WT\WORKTERRAweb\Web\Web Projects\BenAdmin\Areas\UserDetails\Models\EnrollNow\ElectionSummaryPVModel.cs D:\Workterra\WT\WORKTERRAweb\Web\Web Projects\BenAdmin\Areas\Configuration\Models\CreditPoolList\CreditPoolEligibilityModel.cs D:\Workterra\WT\WORKTERRAweb\Web\Web Projects\BenAdmin\Areas\Configuration\Views\Configuration\CreditPoolList\CreditPoolEligibility.cshtml SP: OES_SP_GetEnrollNowSummary
          Hide
          neelam.yangal Neelam Yangal (Inactive) added a comment -

          Hi Amruta Lohiya

          Local and LB check in done for this issue.

          Thanks,
          Neelam

          Show
          neelam.yangal Neelam Yangal (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Amruta Lohiya Local and LB check in done for this issue. Thanks, Neelam
          Hide
          rajendraj Rajendra Joshi (Inactive) added a comment -

          Verified on LB of city of lake worth after discussion with Neelam. Above change is reflecting in confirmation statement correctly.

          Show
          rajendraj Rajendra Joshi (Inactive) added a comment - Verified on LB of city of lake worth after discussion with Neelam. Above change is reflecting in confirmation statement correctly.
          Hide
          rajendraj Rajendra Joshi (Inactive) added a comment -

          Verified on Stage using ASML for HSPL. Above change is reflecting correctly.

          Show
          rajendraj Rajendra Joshi (Inactive) added a comment - Verified on Stage using ASML for HSPL. Above change is reflecting correctly.
          Hide
          rajendraj Rajendra Joshi (Inactive) added a comment -

          Verified on Production using EBS Exchange. Above change is reflecting correctly.

          Show
          rajendraj Rajendra Joshi (Inactive) added a comment - Verified on Production using EBS Exchange. Above change is reflecting correctly.

            People

            Assignee:
            rajendraj Rajendra Joshi (Inactive)
            Reporter:
            neelam.yangal Neelam Yangal (Inactive)
            Developer:
            Neelam Yangal (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:
              Dev Due Date:
              Pre-Prod Due Date:
              Production Due Date:
              Code Review Date: