Details

    • Type: Enhancement
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Low
    • Resolution: Done
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: BenAdmin
    • Labels:
      None
    • Module:
      Platform
    • Item State:
      Production Complete - Closed

      Description

      Please check the Attachment for details

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) created issue -
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) made changes -
            Field Original Value New Value
            Assignee Satya [ ID10004 ] Suraj Sokasane [ suraj.sokasane ]
            rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
            Component/s BenAdmin [ 10000 ]
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Suraj Sokasane [ suraj.sokasane ] Rashmita Dudhe [ rashmita.dudhe ]
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Progress(10206) Parent values: Local QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210)
            Resolution Fixed [ 1 ]
            Hide
            rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) added a comment -

            Suraj Sokasane Is this deployed and i f yes then put your comment what fixed and what files are modified?

            Show
            rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) added a comment - Suraj Sokasane Is this deployed and i f yes then put your comment what fixed and what files are modified?
            Hide
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) added a comment -

            It is an Enhancement. I have attached the analysis document with all details.

            Modified files:
            https://delta.harbinger.in/svn/WT/trunk/WORKTERRAweb/App/BusinessLogic/ImportExportDTS/ImportEmployeeEnrollment.vb

            Show
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) added a comment - It is an Enhancement. I have attached the analysis document with all details. Modified files: https://delta.harbinger.in/svn/WT/trunk/WORKTERRAweb/App/BusinessLogic/ImportExportDTS/ImportEmployeeEnrollment.vb
            rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
            Status New Request [ 10029 ] Pending for Approval [ 10002 ]
            rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Pending for Approval [ 10002 ] Approved for Development [ 10003 ]
            Hide
            rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) added a comment -

            Suraj SokasanePlease update status.

            Show
            rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) added a comment - Suraj Sokasane Please update status.
            Hide
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) added a comment -

            Tested on Local environment.
            Verified below scenario:
            1]Checked their should be the Employer Coverage Amount field in Import.
            2] Import Employer Coverage Amount with different coverage amount for different employee imported successfully.
            3]Verified on Enroll now screen and view enrollment summary imported cost is showing properly.

            But for age banged rule it is not working so created another Jira and assign it to Suraj

            Show
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) added a comment - Tested on Local environment. Verified below scenario: 1]Checked their should be the Employer Coverage Amount field in Import. 2] Import Employer Coverage Amount with different coverage amount for different employee imported successfully. 3]Verified on Enroll now screen and view enrollment summary imported cost is showing properly. But for age banged rule it is not working so created another Jira and assign it to Suraj
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Local QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210) Parent values: Local QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213)
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Link This issue relates to WT-618 [ WT-618 ]
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Approved for Development [ 10003 ] In Development [ 10007 ]
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) made changes -
            Status In Development [ 10007 ] Local Testing [ 10200 ]
            Hide
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) added a comment -

            Rakesh Roy Is it correct now?

            Show
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) added a comment - Rakesh Roy Is it correct now?
            Hide
            rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) added a comment -

            Rashmita Dudhe If any jira ticket is open against any enhancement, parent enahnacment can not be marked as Ready for stage or ready for production.

            Show
            rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) added a comment - Rashmita Dudhe If any jira ticket is open against any enhancement, parent enahnacment can not be marked as Ready for stage or ready for production.
            Hide
            rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) added a comment -

            Rashmita Dudhe Also Test case is mandatory for enhancement

            Show
            rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) added a comment - Rashmita Dudhe Also Test case is mandatory for enhancement
            Hide
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment -

            Hi all - the last communication I received on this item was that it will be deployed on Stage yesterday. Please verify that occurred and let me know when it will be deployed on Production. Thanks.

            Yesterday it was tested and verified on our local testing environment and will deploy on Monday (2/15 IST )on stage.

            Refer https://workterra.atlassian.net/browse/WT-568

            Show
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment - Hi all - the last communication I received on this item was that it will be deployed on Stage yesterday. Please verify that occurred and let me know when it will be deployed on Production. Thanks. Yesterday it was tested and verified on our local testing environment and will deploy on Monday (2/15 IST )on stage. Refer https://workterra.atlassian.net/browse/WT-568
            Hide
            rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) added a comment - - edited

            Jennifer Leugers]Will deploy this tomorrow morning(2/17 IST) on stage and if everything goes fine will deploy the same on production.

            Show
            rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) added a comment - - edited Jennifer Leugers ]Will deploy this tomorrow morning(2/17 IST) on stage and if everything goes fine will deploy the same on production.
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Local Testing [ 10200 ] Pending for Stage Approval [ 10300 ]
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Pending for Stage Approval [ 10300 ] Approved for Stage [ 10030 ]
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Approved for Stage [ 10030 ] Stage Testing [ 10201 ]
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Local QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: In Testing(10214)
            Hide
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) added a comment - - edited

            Tested on Stage:
            Verified below scenario:
            1]Checked their should be the Employer Coverage Amount field in Import.
            2] Import Employer Coverage Amount with different coverage amount for different employee imported successfully.
            3]Verified on Enroll now screen and view enrollment summary imported cost is showing properly.

            We are moving this patch with known issues related Age Band approve coverage amount.

            Show
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) added a comment - - edited Tested on Stage: Verified below scenario: 1]Checked their should be the Employer Coverage Amount field in Import. 2] Import Employer Coverage Amount with different coverage amount for different employee imported successfully. 3]Verified on Enroll now screen and view enrollment summary imported cost is showing properly. We are moving this patch with known issues related Age Band approve coverage amount.
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: In Testing(10214) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Ready for Production(10217)
            Hide
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) added a comment -

            Jennifer Leugers
            Hi jennifer,

            This is deployed on stage and we have verified it.
            We will deploy this patch on production tomorrow(2/18 IST).

            [Note: Scope area which is affecting Enhancement i.e Age Band Criteria we are not start working on this related jira WT-618]

            Thanks & Regards,
            Rashmita

            Show
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) added a comment - Jennifer Leugers Hi jennifer, This is deployed on stage and we have verified it. We will deploy this patch on production tomorrow(2/18 IST). [Note: Scope area which is affecting Enhancement i.e Age Band Criteria we are not start working on this related jira WT-618] Thanks & Regards, Rashmita
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Stage Testing [ 10201 ] Pending for Production Approval [ 10301 ]
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Pending for Production Approval [ 10301 ] Approved for production [ 10034 ]
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Approved for production [ 10034 ] Production Testing [ 10202 ]
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Ready for Production(10217) Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: In Testing(10218)
            Hide
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment -

            Hi all - was this deployed on Production?

            Show
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment - Hi all - was this deployed on Production?
            Hide
            rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) added a comment -

            Jennifer LeugersYes, its deployed on production today.

            Show
            rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) added a comment - Jennifer Leugers Yes, its deployed on production today.
            Hide
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) added a comment -

            Jennifer Leugers
            Hi jennifer,

            This is deployed on Production and we have verified it.
            [Note: Scope area which is affecting Enhancement i.e Age Band Criteria we are not start working on this related jira WT-618]

            Thanks & Regards,
            Rashmita

            Show
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) added a comment - Jennifer Leugers Hi jennifer, This is deployed on Production and we have verified it. [Note: Scope area which is affecting Enhancement i.e Age Band Criteria we are not start working on this related jira WT-618] Thanks & Regards, Rashmita
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Production Testing [ 10202 ] Production Complete [ 10028 ]
            Hide
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment -

            Hi Rashmita - I'm confused by the comments above. Could you please provide more information on what was done in Production and what is included in the enhancement ticket 618? Thanks.

            Show
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment - Hi Rashmita - I'm confused by the comments above. Could you please provide more information on what was done in Production and what is included in the enhancement ticket 618? Thanks.
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment HSA_Age_wise_coverage amount.odt [ 12078 ]
            Hide
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) added a comment -

            Jennifer Leugers
            Hi Jennifer,

            Kindly, Go through the attached Document HSA_Age_Wise_Coverage_Amount
            For Enhancement Jira ticket 618.
            Let us know if you need more information.

            Thanks & Regards,
            Rashmita

            Show
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) added a comment - Jennifer Leugers Hi Jennifer, Kindly, Go through the attached Document HSA_Age_Wise_Coverage_Amount For Enhancement Jira ticket 618. Let us know if you need more information. Thanks & Regards, Rashmita
            Hide
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment -

            I will look through the enhancement 618 but I'm still confused on what was deployed to Stage. Per the comments I received from Rakesh, it was tested and verified on our local environment and was supposed to deploy on Monday January 15. So what was deployed?
            Rakesh Roy

            Show
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment - I will look through the enhancement 618 but I'm still confused on what was deployed to Stage. Per the comments I received from Rakesh, it was tested and verified on our local environment and was supposed to deploy on Monday January 15. So what was deployed? Rakesh Roy
            Hide
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Jennifer Leugers,

            In WT- 568 we have allowed to add / update ER coverage using election import. There is no validation on coverage amount as per the age bands. Because of time constraint, we pushed it as it is and created new ticket 618 to provide validations on age bands.
            You can use the functionality to add update ER coverage but you have to give exact amount of coverage like we give in other cases.

            Show
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Jennifer Leugers , In WT- 568 we have allowed to add / update ER coverage using election import. There is no validation on coverage amount as per the age bands. Because of time constraint, we pushed it as it is and created new ticket 618 to provide validations on age bands. You can use the functionality to add update ER coverage but you have to give exact amount of coverage like we give in other cases.
            Hide
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment -

            Hi all - here are UHC comments on the attached document

            Sorry for the delay on this! I was able to review the attached and am unsure what we should be commenting on. It looks like from the screen shots the system would continue to operate as it does today with exception that once new functionality is released we will be able to load both EE & ER contributions.

            Is the question pertaining to the import allowing greater values than identified in customization chart for EE and/or ER contributions to be successfully imported? If that is the case – then yes our preference would be to have any records error that exceed the threshold identified in the customization chart.

            Show
            jennifer.leugers Jennifer Leugers added a comment - Hi all - here are UHC comments on the attached document Sorry for the delay on this! I was able to review the attached and am unsure what we should be commenting on. It looks like from the screen shots the system would continue to operate as it does today with exception that once new functionality is released we will be able to load both EE & ER contributions. Is the question pertaining to the import allowing greater values than identified in customization chart for EE and/or ER contributions to be successfully imported? If that is the case – then yes our preference would be to have any records error that exceed the threshold identified in the customization chart.
            Hide
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Jennifer Leugers,

            Currently, there's no validation on ER Coverage, It'll get in even if you give value greater than the max as per customization.
            When the another ticket: WT-618 will be completed, Yes the records with ER exceeding the limit in customization will be kicked out.

            Show
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Jennifer Leugers , Currently, there's no validation on ER Coverage, It'll get in even if you give value greater than the max as per customization. When the another ticket: WT-618 will be completed, Yes the records with ER exceeding the limit in customization will be kicked out.
            rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: In Testing(10218) Parent values: Production Complete(10222)Level 1 values: Closed(10223)
            rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
            Account Executive Jennifer Leugers [ jennifer.leugers ]
            Developer Suraj Sokasane [ suraj.sokasane ]
            QA Rashmita Dudhe [ rashmita.dudhe ]
            rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Production Complete [ 10028 ] Closed [ 6 ]
            Transition Time In Source Status Execution Times
            Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made transition -
            New Request Pending for Approval
            1d 19h 26m 1
            Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made transition -
            Pending for Approval Approved for Development
            3s 1
            Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) made transition -
            Approved for Development In Development
            36m 9s 1
            Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) made transition -
            In Development In LB Testing
            7s 1
            Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) made transition -
            In LB Testing Pending for Stage Approval
            6d 2h 58m 1
            Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) made transition -
            Pending for Stage Approval Approved for Stage
            17s 1
            Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) made transition -
            Approved for Stage Stage Testing
            7s 1
            Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) made transition -
            Stage Testing Pending for Production Approval
            1d 48m 1
            Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) made transition -
            Pending for Production Approval Approved for production
            3s 1
            Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) made transition -
            Approved for production In Production Testing
            13s 1
            Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made transition -
            In Production Testing Production Complete
            22h 19m 1
            Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made transition -
            Production Complete Closed
            182d 4h 42m 1

              People

              Assignee:
              rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive)
              Reporter:
              suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive)
              Account Executive:
              Jennifer Leugers
              Developer:
              Suraj Sokasane (Inactive)
              QA:
              Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              5 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: