Uploaded image for project: 'WORKTERRA'
  1. WORKTERRA
  2. WT-6061

ACA_Dependent ordering on the ACA Correction screen and 1095-C screen is not same.

    Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Low
    • Resolution: Done
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: ACA
    • Labels:
      None
    • Module:
      ACA
    • Reported by:
      Harbinger
    • Item State:
      Production Complete - Closed

      Description

      1.Login to LB with Partner.
      2.Edit company say 'ACA Automation'
      3.Add new employee. [Already added for reference 000000043].
      4.Enroll EE,Sp and Dependents in ACA plan.
      5.Check 1095-C report
      6.Now correct 1095-C report for dependents
      7.Again Check 1095-C report

      Actual: Ordering of Dependents on Correction screen and 1095-C report is not same
      Expected: We can keep ordering of dependents on both screen same

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

            Hide
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment -

            Files Affected:

            Database Objects/MasterCompanyDB/04_Stored Procedures/dbo.OES_SP_ACA_Get1095CCorrectionData.sql

            Show
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment - Files Affected: Database Objects/MasterCompanyDB/04_Stored Procedures/dbo.OES_SP_ACA_Get1095CCorrectionData.sql
            Hide
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment -

            Concern: ACA_Dependent ordering on the ACA Correction screen and 1095-C screen is not same.
            Cause: In Dependent list ordering was done only by member Type ID and not with Member ID. So in the list, the ordering of the child was getting mismatched with the 1095C report.
            Correction: Added Member ID to order by clause, so that list is ordered by Member type ID and Member ID.

            Show
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment - Concern : ACA_Dependent ordering on the ACA Correction screen and 1095-C screen is not same. Cause : In Dependent list ordering was done only by member Type ID and not with Member ID. So in the list, the ordering of the child was getting mismatched with the 1095C report. Correction : Added Member ID to order by clause, so that list is ordered by Member type ID and Member ID.
            Hide
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment -

            Smita Pawar

            Please verify.

            Show
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment - Smita Pawar Please verify.
            Hide
            sachin.hingole Sachin Hingole (Inactive) added a comment -

            verified on LB, working fine.

            Show
            sachin.hingole Sachin Hingole (Inactive) added a comment - verified on LB, working fine.
            Hide
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment -

            We have verified above mentioned issue on stage [ACA Automation].
            Its working fine.
            Attaching screen shot for additional information.
            Fix is ready for Production.

            Show
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment - We have verified above mentioned issue on stage [ACA Automation] . Its working fine. Attaching screen shot for additional information. Fix is ready for Production.
            Hide
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment -

            We have verified above mentioned issue on Production Company [For ACA BSGTest ACA Automation company].
            Its working fine.
            Now child dependent ordering is as same as 1095-c correction screen on 1095-C report also.

            Show
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment - We have verified above mentioned issue on Production Company [For ACA BSGTest ACA Automation company] . Its working fine. Now child dependent ordering is as same as 1095-c correction screen on 1095-C report also.
            Hide
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment -

            This issue is fixed and

            Show
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment - This issue is fixed and

              People

              Assignee:
              smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive)
              Reporter:
              smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              3 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: