Hi Jennifer Leugers,
#1: The waiting periods were not showing correctly as we were considering today's date in populating effective date. We have resolved this. Please refer latest run for verification.
#2: Employee David Victor Mojica termed on 01/15/2016.As he was employed for the first 15 days in the month of Jan, he got a 1095C form.
Please refer screenshot:
Our observation is that by using timesheet data, most of the employees codes are not coming properly. This may be due incomplete timesheet data.
We have not considered timesheet data in the latest run. We have considered employee type set on Demographics page.
Please let us know if timesheet data is to be considered. If yes, please ensure that the loaded data is proper.
CC:Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar,Sachin Hingole,Smita Pawar
Hi Jennifer Leugers,
We observed that measurement and stability rules are set on this company and timesheet for 2015 is also loaded.
But as per measurement and stability rules,
Measurement period is divided into 11/1/2014-10/31/2015 and 11/1/2015-10/31/2016 and
stability period for 2016 year is divided into 2 parts i.e 11/1/2015-10/31/2016 and 11/1/2016-10/31/2017. For measurement period 11/1/2015-10/31/2016, time sheet is not present for the year 2016, so employees are coming up as part time for months Nov and Dec of year 2016 as only Nov and Dec 2015 timesheet data is present. So codes of part time will be displayed.
Please verify the measurement and stability rules and import 2016 timesheet of employees.
CC:Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar,Sachin Hingole