-
Type:
Bug
-
Status: Closed
-
Priority:
Low
-
Resolution: Done
-
Affects Version/s: None
-
Fix Version/s: None
-
Component/s: ACA
-
Labels:None
-
Environment:QA
-
Module:ACA - 2017
-
Reported by:Harbinger
-
Item State:Production Complete - Closed
1.Login to LB with partner.
2.Edit company say "ACA Automation".
3.Navigate to Home >> Company Home>> BenAdmin Home>> BenAdmin Company Home >> ACA
4.Add employee with Employment date as "01/01/2016"
5.Import a time sheet for the employee.
6.Extract 1095-C report.
Refer employee '011111116' from ACA Automation
PFA 1095-C codes for additional information and its timesheet.
Actual: Received blank codes for the month of Feb and March.
Expected: Codes should get reflected on report as employee's salary is 120000.
As per above comment,please move the parent enhancement forward as this issue is kept as low priority and we will schedule it later after through analysis.
Ramya Tantry (Inactive)
added a comment - Smita Pawar ,
As per above comment,please move the parent enhancement forward as this issue is kept as low priority and we will schedule it later after through analysis. Please update if there is any update for this ticket.
Smita Pawar (Inactive)
added a comment - Ramya Tantry
Please update if there is any update for this ticket.
Refer WT-7416 for more details.
Ramya Tantry (Inactive)
added a comment - Smita Pawar ,
Refer WT-7416 for more details. We have regressed this issue on LB - ACAAutomation and observed that issue does not exist.Hence marking ready for stage.
This jira is already moved to stage in other patch.
Ramya Tantry (Inactive)
added a comment - This jira is already moved to stage in other patch. We have regressed this issue on Stage - City of Bellevue For HSPL
and observed that issue does not exist.Hence marking ready for Production.
This Jira is already moved to Production in other patch.
Ramya Tantry (Inactive)
added a comment - This Jira is already moved to Production in other patch. Can you please check this issue
We observed that the plans selected on this report does not have safe harbor set.If the safe harbors are set then,appropriate safe harbor codes gets displayed instead of blank codes.
As, this employee does not have stability period for 1st 3 months from date of hire,safe harbor set on measurement and stability is not applied here. Due to boundary condition(01/01/2016), this new hire employee is getting standard rule as both the rule's measurement and stability period coincide.
This is a very rare scenario where employee is not having any safe harbor and he is not having any stability for 1st 3 months from date of hire.
Every less no. of employees will be affected due to this.
However, we need to fix this,but currently we are keeping this as low priority.