-
Type:
Bug
-
Status: Closed
-
Priority:
Low
-
Resolution: Done
-
Affects Version/s: None
-
Fix Version/s: None
-
Component/s: ACA
-
Labels:None
-
Environment:QA
-
Module:ACA - 2017
-
Reported by:Harbinger
-
Item State:Production Complete - Closed
1.Login to LB with partner.
2.Edit company say "ACA Automation".
3.Navigate to Home >> Company Home>> BenAdmin Home>> BenAdmin Company Home >> ACA
4.Add employee with Employment date as "01/01/2016"
5.Import a time sheet for the employee.
6.Extract 1095-C report.
Refer employee '011111116' from ACA Automation
PFA 1095-C codes for additional information and its timesheet.
Actual: Received blank codes for the month of Feb and March.
Expected: Codes should get reflected on report as employee's salary is 120000.
Field | Original Value | New Value |
---|---|---|
Summary | ACA_2017 New Hire Rule_Received blank codes for the month of Feb and March. | ACA_2017 _Received blank codes for the month of Feb and March. |
Attachment | Employee Timesheet test.txt [ 33401 ] |
Attachment | 011111116.png [ 33402 ] |
Status | Open [ 1 ] | In Development [ 10007 ] |
Description |
1.Login to LB with partner. 2.Edit company say "ACA Automation". 3.Navigate to Home >> Company Home>> BenAdmin Home>> BenAdmin Company Home >> ACA 4.Add employee with Employment date as "01/01/2016" 5.Import a time sheet for the employee. 6.Extract 1095-C report. Refer employee '011111116' from ACA Automation PFA 1095-C codes for additional information and its timesheet. Actual: Received blank codes for the month of Feb and March. Expected: Codes should get reflected on report as employee's salary is 120000. |
1.Login to LB with partner. 2.Edit company say "ACA Automation". 3.Navigate to Home >> Company Home>> BenAdmin Home>> BenAdmin Company Home >> ACA 4.Add employee with Employment date as "01/01/2016" 5.Import a time sheet for the employee. 6.Extract 1095-C report. Refer employee '011111116' from ACA Automation PFA 1095-C codes for additional information and its timesheet. Actual: Received blank codes for the month of Feb and March. Expected: Codes should get reflected on report as employee's salary is 120000. |
Remaining Estimate | 1h [ 3600 ] | |
Original Estimate | 1h [ 3600 ] |
Original Estimate | 1h [ 3600 ] | 14h [ 50400 ] |
Remaining Estimate | 1h [ 3600 ] | 14h [ 50400 ] |
Remaining Estimate | 14h [ 50400 ] | 10h [ 36000 ] |
Time Spent | 4h [ 14400 ] | |
Worklog Id | 10597 [ 10597 ] |
Remaining Estimate | 10h [ 36000 ] | 12h [ 43200 ] |
Time Spent | 4h [ 14400 ] | 2h [ 7200 ] |
Worklog Id | 10597 [ 10597 ] |
Remaining Estimate | 12h [ 43200 ] | 10.5h [ 37800 ] |
Time Spent | 2h [ 7200 ] | 3.5h [ 12600 ] |
Worklog Id | 10720 [ 10720 ] |
-
- Time Spent:
- 2.5h
-
Issue analysis
Discussion with Nandkumar.
Remaining Estimate | 10.5h [ 37800 ] | 8h [ 28800 ] |
Time Spent | 3.5h [ 12600 ] | 6h [ 21600 ] |
Worklog Id | 10913 [ 10913 ] |
Item State | Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: On Hold(10207) |
Item State | Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: On Hold(10207) | Parent values: Development(10200) |
Item State | Parent values: Development(10200) |
Priority | High [ 2 ] | Low [ 4 ] |
Assignee | Ramya Tantry [ ramya.tantry ] | Smita Pawar [ smita.pawar ] |
Remaining Estimate | 8h [ 28800 ] | 7.75h [ 27900 ] |
Time Spent | 6h [ 21600 ] | 6.25h [ 22500 ] |
Worklog Id | 11016 [ 11016 ] |
-
- Time Spent:
- 1h
-
Verified by changing the customization
Remaining Estimate | 7.75h [ 27900 ] | 6.75h [ 24300 ] |
Time Spent | 6.25h [ 22500 ] | 7.25h [ 26100 ] |
Worklog Id | 11035 [ 11035 ] |
Status | In Development [ 10007 ] | Local Testing [ 10200 ] |
Item State | Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210) |
Assignee | Smita Pawar [ smita.pawar ] | Ramya Tantry [ ramya.tantry ] |
Assignee | Ramya Tantry [ ramya.tantry ] | Smita Pawar [ smita.pawar ] |
Assignee | Smita Pawar [ smita.pawar ] | Mahendra Mungase [ mahendra.mungase ] |
Item State | Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210) | Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213) |
Remaining Estimate | 6.75h [ 24300 ] | 6.25h [ 22500 ] |
Time Spent | 7.25h [ 26100 ] | 7.75h [ 27900 ] |
Worklog Id | 21997 [ 21997 ] |
Developer | Ramya Tantry [ ramya.tantry ] |
Code Reviewed By | Nandkumar Karlekar [ 11904 ] |
Item State | Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213) | Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: In Testing(10214) |
Remaining Estimate | 6.25h [ 22500 ] | 5.75h [ 20700 ] |
Time Spent | 7.75h [ 27900 ] | 8.25h [ 29700 ] |
Worklog Id | 22708 [ 22708 ] |
Remaining Estimate | 5.75h [ 20700 ] | 6.25h [ 22500 ] |
Time Spent | 8.25h [ 29700 ] | 7.75h [ 27900 ] |
Worklog Id | 22708 [ 22708 ] | |
Worklog Time Spent | 0.5h [ 1800 ] |
Status | Local Testing [ 10200 ] | Stage Testing [ 10201 ] |
Item State | Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: In Testing(10214) | Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Ready for Production(10217) |
-
- Time Spent:
- 1.5h
-
Data creation and bug regression on Stage
Remaining Estimate | 6.25h [ 22500 ] | 4.75h [ 17100 ] |
Time Spent | 7.75h [ 27900 ] | 9.25h [ 33300 ] |
Worklog Id | 22971 [ 22971 ] |
Assignee | Mahendra Mungase [ mahendra.mungase ] | Smita Pawar [ smita.pawar ] |
Production Due Date | 10/Feb/2017 |
Item State | Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Ready for Production(10217) | Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: In Testing(10218) |
Status | Stage Testing [ 10201 ] | Production Testing [ 10202 ] |
Resolution | Fixed [ 1 ] | |
Status | Production Testing [ 10202 ] | Production Complete [ 10028 ] |
Item State | Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: In Testing(10218) | Parent values: Production Complete(10222)Level 1 values: Closed(10223) |
Status | Production Complete [ 10028 ] | Closed [ 6 ] |
Environment_New | LB [ 18444 ] |
Transition | Time In Source Status | Execution Times |
---|
|
3d 20h 21m | 1 |
|
8d 7h 37m | 1 |
|
58d 15h 52m | 1 |
|
7d 22h 18m | 1 |
|
30s | 1 |
|
10d 1h 5m | 1 |
We observed that the plans selected on this report does not have safe harbor set.If the safe harbors are set then,appropriate safe harbor codes gets displayed instead of blank codes.
As, this employee does not have stability period for 1st 3 months from date of hire,safe harbor set on measurement and stability is not applied here. Due to boundary condition(01/01/2016), this new hire employee is getting standard rule as both the rule's measurement and stability period coincide.
This is a very rare scenario where employee is not having any safe harbor and he is not having any stability for 1st 3 months from date of hire.
Every less no. of employees will be affected due to this.
However, we need to fix this,but currently we are keeping this as low priority.