-
Type:
Bug
-
Status: Closed
-
Priority:
High
-
Resolution: Done
-
Affects Version/s: None
-
Fix Version/s: None
-
Component/s: ACA
-
Labels:None
-
Environment:QA
-
Module:ACA - 2017
-
Reported by:Harbinger
-
Item State:Production Complete - Closed
Issue 1
1.Login to LB with Partner.
2.Edit company say "ACAAutomation".
3.Add employee.
4.Add a time sheet for an employee as he will become Part time.
5.Run the 1095-C report for employee
[Please refer already added employee having SSN 011111118]
Actual: 2F code displayed even though employee was part time.
Expected: 2B code should displayed when employee was part time.
Issue 2
On time sheet report displayed stable working hours as 40 even though employee is full time
PFA screen shot for additional information
- relates to
-
WT-2629 ACA-2017 Providing limited assessment period scenario when Employees status is changed from part time to full time.
-
- Closed
-
Concern: 2F code is getting display even if employee is Part time
Cause:This employee does not have stability period for 1st 3 months from date of hire. Due to boundary condition(01/01/2016 as DOH), this new hire employee is getting standard rule as both the rule's measurement and stability period coincide.So it was considering this employee in standard rule and was pulling up his demographic data (Full time). So full time codes displayed on 1095C report.
Correction: Handled condition to handle boundary condition of Date of hire.
Ramya Tantry (Inactive)
added a comment - Concern : 2F code is getting display even if employee is Part time
Cause :This employee does not have stability period for 1st 3 months from date of hire. Due to boundary condition(01/01/2016 as DOH), this new hire employee is getting standard rule as both the rule's measurement and stability period coincide.So it was considering this employee in standard rule and was pulling up his demographic data (Full time). So full time codes displayed on 1095C report.
Correction : Handled condition to handle boundary condition of Date of hire. We have verified above mentioned issue on LB [ACA Automation] company.
Its working fine.
Currently on time sheet also correct stable working hours are displaying also.
PFA screen shot of verified employee.
Smita Pawar (Inactive)
added a comment - We have verified above mentioned issue on LB [ACA Automation] company.
Its working fine.
Currently on time sheet also correct stable working hours are displaying also.
PFA screen shot of verified employee.
We have verified above mentioned issue on Stage [ACA Automation] company.
Its working fine.
Similarly employee stable working hours are displayed correctly.
Attaching screen shot for additional information.
We will move this fix to production with enhancement WT-2629
Smita Pawar (Inactive)
added a comment - - edited We have verified above mentioned issue on Stage [ACA Automation] company.
Its working fine.
Similarly employee stable working hours are displayed correctly.
Attaching screen shot for additional information.
We will move this fix to production with enhancement WT-2629 
Files affected
Database Objects/MasterCompanyDB/02_UDFs/dbo.OES_UDF_ACAApplyRulesOfParity.UserDefineFunction.sql