Uploaded image for project: 'WORKTERRA'
  1. WORKTERRA
  2. WT-7288

WT -> BCC Invoice Enhancement -> Adjustments shown was summation of all costs (not wrong but not uniform with the decided behaviour)

    Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Medium
    • Resolution: Done
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: BenAdmin
    • Labels:
      None
    • Environment:
      QA
    • Module:
      BenAdmin - Report
    • Reported by:
      Harbinger
    • Item State:
      Production Complete - Closed

      Description

      Plan - Vision [existing enrollment from Sept to Dec 2016]
      Rate 1 - Non Self Insured (billed rate = $20)
      Rate 2 - Non Self Insured (billed rate = $7)

      Hence system invoices showed total cost $27 - expected

      Now make second rate ineligible for an employee and recalculate the same

      fetched invoice for Sept Oct Nov 2016 -> billing details shown as $20 - Expected

      Now again make second rate eligible for employee and recalculate the same

      fetched Dec 2016 Invoice

      Expected & Actual Results -

      Dec 2016 billing Detail of $27 - worked well
      Adjustment for Sept Oct Nov 2016 should have come as $ +20 and $ + $07 - it came as $27

      This is not wrong
      But we are showing two entries everywhere in adjustments - not summing u the costs.
      Please decide one approach and make it uniform everywhere

      CC - Deepali Tidke Rakesh Roy Prasanna Karlekar Venkatesh Pujari

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) created issue -
            Hide
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) added a comment - - edited

            Somewhere I also think - showing the adjustment amounts buy summing up them will be more appropriate. But as in other cases we are not summing up the adjustment amounts - logging this discrepancy in above ticket
            Ie, say if it is $20 and $ 30 - we can show it as $50
            if it is $ - 20 and $ 30 - we can show it as $10

            we can have a call with client and decide the approach

            Show
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) added a comment - - edited Somewhere I also think - showing the adjustment amounts buy summing up them will be more appropriate. But as in other cases we are not summing up the adjustment amounts - logging this discrepancy in above ticket Ie, say if it is $20 and $ 30 - we can show it as $50 if it is $ - 20 and $ 30 - we can show it as $10 we can have a call with client and decide the approach
            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) logged work - 30/Dec/16 12:26 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1h
               

              Analysis, scenario generation, code fix, unit testing

            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) made changes -
            Field Original Value New Value
            Remaining Estimate 3h [ 10800 ] 2h [ 7200 ]
            Time Spent 1h [ 3600 ]
            Worklog Id 16418 [ 16418 ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Prasanna Karlekar [ prasanna ] Jyoti Agrawal [ jyoti.agrawal ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Priority Medium [ 3 ] High [ 2 ]
            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) made changes -
            Priority High [ 2 ] Medium [ 3 ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Dev Due Date 24/Feb/2017
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Dev Due Date 24/Feb/2017 16/Feb/2017
            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) logged work - 14/Feb/17 11:21 AM
            • Time Spent:
              2h
               

              Analysis

            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 2h [ 7200 ] 0h [ 0 ]
            Time Spent 1h [ 3600 ] 3h [ 10800 ]
            Worklog Id 25153 [ 25153 ]
            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) logged work - 15/Feb/17 01:47 PM
            • Time Spent:
              4h
               

              Analysis, Discussion, Coding , Scenario creation

            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 3h [ 10800 ] 7h [ 25200 ]
            Worklog Id 25274 [ 25274 ]
            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) logged work - 16/Feb/17 02:33 PM
            • Time Spent:
              5h
               

              Discussion, code change, scenario generation

            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) logged work - 16/Feb/17 10:00 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1.5h
               

              Analysis
              Discussion
              Pair programming

            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) made changes -
            Link This issue relates to WT-7703 [ WT-7703 ]
            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) logged work - 17/Feb/17 02:06 PM
            • Time Spent:
              4h
               

              Analysis, discussion, coding, scenario generation

            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 7h [ 25200 ] 11h [ 39600 ]
            Worklog Id 25938 [ 25938 ]
            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 11h [ 39600 ] 16h [ 57600 ]
            Worklog Id 25959 [ 25959 ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Open [ 1 ] In Development [ 10007 ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 16h [ 57600 ] 17.5h [ 63000 ]
            Worklog Id 25965 [ 25965 ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 17.5h [ 63000 ] 18.5h [ 66600 ]
            Worklog Id 25966 [ 25966 ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) logged work - 17/Feb/17 10:00 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1h
               

              Pair programming for issue fix.

            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Dev Due Date 16/Feb/2017 24/Feb/2017
            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) made changes -
            Link This issue relates to WT-7543 [ WT-7543 ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 18.5h [ 66600 ] 19.75h [ 71100 ]
            Worklog Id 26732 [ 26732 ]
            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) logged work - 22/Feb/17 06:44 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1h
               

              Discussion

            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) logged work - 23/Feb/17 02:30 AM
            • Time Spent:
              1.25h
               

              Pair programming and discussion.

            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 19.75h [ 71100 ] 20.75h [ 74700 ]
            Worklog Id 27044 [ 27044 ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) logged work - 25/Feb/17 02:30 AM
            • Time Spent:
              1h
               

              Analysis on bringing adjustments for complete election.

            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 20.75h [ 74700 ] 21.75h [ 78300 ]
            Worklog Id 27889 [ 27889 ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Dev Due Date 24/Feb/2017 14/Mar/2017
            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) made changes -
            Link This issue relates to WT-6953 [ WT-6953 ]
            meghana.joshi Meghana Joshi (Inactive) made changes -
            Severity Medium [ 13102 ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Dev Due Date 14/Mar/2017 29/Mar/2017
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: On Hold(10207)
            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) logged work - 24/Mar/17 02:24 PM
            • Time Spent:
              2h
               

              Analysis

            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 21.75h [ 78300 ] 23.75h [ 85500 ]
            Worklog Id 33726 [ 33726 ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Dev Due Date 29/Mar/2017 07/Apr/2017
            lalit.kumar Lalit Kumar (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment WT-7288.docx [ 43483 ]
            lalit.kumar Lalit Kumar (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment WT-7288.docx [ 43483 ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) logged work - 30/Mar/17 02:30 AM
            • Time Spent:
              0.75h
               

              Scenario discussion

            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 23.75h [ 85500 ] 27.75h [ 99900 ]
            Worklog Id 35177 [ 35177 ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 27.75h [ 99900 ] 28.5h [ 102600 ]
            Worklog Id 35318 [ 35318 ]
            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) logged work - 31/Mar/17 01:14 PM
            • Time Spent:
              4h
               

              Discussion, analysis

            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) logged work - 03/Apr/17 01:30 PM
            • Time Spent:
              5h
               

              Analysis, coding, discussion

            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 28.5h [ 102600 ] 33.5h [ 120600 ]
            Worklog Id 35805 [ 35805 ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) logged work - 03/Apr/17 10:00 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1h
               

              Scenario Discussion

            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: On Hold(10207) Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Progress(10206)
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Developer Jyoti Agrawal [ jyoti.agrawal ]
            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) logged work - 04/Apr/17 01:16 PM
            • Time Spent:
              6h
               

              Discussion, scenario creation, testing

            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 33.5h [ 120600 ] 39.5h [ 142200 ]
            Worklog Id 36020 [ 36020 ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) logged work - 04/Apr/17 10:30 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1.5h
               

              Scenario discussion

            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) made changes -
            Dev Due Date 07/Apr/2017 12/Apr/2017
            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) logged work - 05/Apr/17 01:30 PM
            • Time Spent:
              7h
               

              Coding, analysis, discussion, testing

            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 39.5h [ 142200 ] 46.5h [ 167400 ]
            Worklog Id 36321 [ 36321 ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) logged work - 05/Apr/17 09:30 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1.5h
               

              Scenarion discussion
              Discussion on testing approach

            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) logged work - 06/Apr/17 01:26 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1.5h
               

              Coding

            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 46.5h [ 167400 ] 48h [ 172800 ]
            Worklog Id 36636 [ 36636 ]
            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) logged work - 07/Apr/17 01:26 PM
            • Time Spent:
              8h
               

              Scenario creation, testing with Billed rate , Self Insured

            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 48h [ 172800 ] 56h [ 201600 ]
            Worklog Id 36927 [ 36927 ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) logged work - 08/Apr/17 12:30 AM
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               

              Invoice Scenario discussion

            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 56h [ 201600 ] 56.5h [ 203400 ]
            Worklog Id 37012 [ 37012 ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 56.5h [ 203400 ] 58h [ 208800 ]
            Worklog Id 37027 [ 37027 ]
            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) logged work - 10/Apr/17 01:37 PM
            • Time Spent:
              7h
               

              Coding,testing,discussion,analysis

            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 58h [ 208800 ] 65h [ 234000 ]
            Worklog Id 37244 [ 37244 ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) logged work - 10/Apr/17 11:30 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1.5h
               

              Scenario discussion and analysis for issue fix in case of 0 cost adjustments

            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) logged work - 11/Apr/17 01:07 PM
            • Time Spent:
              5h
               

              Coding, discussion, analysis

            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) logged work - 12/Apr/17 12:00 AM
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               

              Scenario discussion

            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) logged work - 12/Apr/17 11:08 AM
            • Time Spent:
              1h
               

              Discussion, code fix

            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) logged work - 12/Apr/17 06:30 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1h
               

              Discussion on Indexing and Performance for Invoice

            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 65h [ 234000 ] 70h [ 252000 ]
            Worklog Id 38285 [ 38285 ]
            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 70h [ 252000 ] 71h [ 255600 ]
            Worklog Id 38306 [ 38306 ]
            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) logged work - 17/Apr/17 03:52 PM
            • Time Spent:
              2h
               

              Analysis, coding

            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) logged work - 18/Apr/17 03:53 PM
            • Time Spent:
              6h
               

              Coding, discussion, testing

            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) logged work - 19/Apr/17 04:12 PM
            • Time Spent:
              3h
               

              Discussion, coding

            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 71h [ 255600 ] 73h [ 262800 ]
            Worklog Id 39480 [ 39480 ]
            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 73h [ 262800 ] 79h [ 284400 ]
            Worklog Id 39481 [ 39481 ]
            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 79h [ 284400 ] 82h [ 295200 ]
            Worklog Id 39491 [ 39491 ]
            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) logged work - 20/Apr/17 02:16 PM
            • Time Spent:
              6h
               

              Coding, discussion, testing

            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) logged work - 20/Apr/17 06:30 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1.5h
               

              Scenario discussion:
              1. Terminated elections getting rate when new rate is eligible
              2. Free in - pay out policy

            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) logged work - 21/Apr/17 02:16 PM
            • Time Spent:
              9h
               

              Coding, discussion, testing

            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 82h [ 295200 ] 88h [ 316800 ]
            Worklog Id 40111 [ 40111 ]
            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 88h [ 316800 ] 97h [ 349200 ]
            Worklog Id 40113 [ 40113 ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) logged work - 21/Apr/17 06:00 PM
            • Time Spent:
              2h
               

              Discussion on:
              1. Mid month Tier Scenario when new rate is assigned for Terminated as well as active election
              2. Free in - Pay out policy

              Pair Programming:
              Query changes to fetch the latest record for election irrespective of positive / negative cost.

            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) logged work - 24/Apr/17 02:24 PM
            • Time Spent:
              5h
               

              Coding, discussion, testing

            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 97h [ 349200 ] 102h [ 367200 ]
            Worklog Id 40460 [ 40460 ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) logged work - 24/Apr/17 10:00 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1h
               

              Scenario discussion

            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 102h [ 367200 ] 103.5h [ 372600 ]
            Worklog Id 40568 [ 40568 ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 103.5h [ 372600 ] 105.5h [ 379800 ]
            Worklog Id 40575 [ 40575 ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 105.5h [ 379800 ] 107h [ 385200 ]
            Worklog Id 40585 [ 40585 ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 107h [ 385200 ] 107.5h [ 387000 ]
            Worklog Id 40596 [ 40596 ]
            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) logged work - 25/Apr/17 01:32 PM
            • Time Spent:
              3h
               

              Unit Testing, discussion with Prasanna

            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 107.5h [ 387000 ] 110.5h [ 397800 ]
            Worklog Id 40678 [ 40678 ]
            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Progress(10206) Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Review(10208)
            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) made changes -
            Code Review Date 27/Apr/2017
            Code Reviewed By Prasanna Karlekar [ 11907 ]
            Dev Due Date 12/Apr/2017 27/Apr/2017
            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) logged work - 26/Apr/17 05:42 PM
            • Time Spent:
              4h
               

              Testing

            hrishikesh.deshpande Hrishikesh Deshpande (Inactive) made changes -
            QA Venkatesh Pujari [ venkatesh.pujari ]
            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 110.5h [ 397800 ] 114.5h [ 412200 ]
            Worklog Id 41134 [ 41134 ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 114.5h [ 412200 ] 115.5h [ 415800 ]
            Worklog Id 41575 [ 41575 ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 115.5h [ 415800 ] 117h [ 421200 ]
            Worklog Id 41798 [ 41798 ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 117h [ 421200 ] 118h [ 424800 ]
            Worklog Id 41901 [ 41901 ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 118h [ 424800 ] 119h [ 428400 ]
            Worklog Id 42182 [ 42182 ]
            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) made changes -
            Code Review Date 27/Apr/2017 02/May/2017
            Hide
            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) added a comment -

            3c's:-
            Concern :- Incorrect adjustments in case of multiple rates mapped to a plan
            Cause :- Adjustments for multiple rates were not handled properly
            Correction :- Handled Adjustments for multiple rate mapped to a plan. Implemented to show adjustments at subrate level

            Affected areas :- Adjustment of all benefit types
            Affected files :- OES_SP_GetRetroBillingDetails_InvoiceBenefitWise

            Tested following scenarios :-
            1) Health benefits
            a) With two billed rates

            • Retro enrollment and future enrollment
            • Eligibility change of rates
            • Cost change of one rate
            • Cost swap of both rate
            • Addition of new rate
            • Tier change
            • Change in cost of one subrate

            b) With two Self insured rates - tested all of above scenarios
            c) With one billed rate and other self insured rate - tested all of above scenarios

            2) Non health benefits
            a) Life benefits - tested all of above with coverage change

            b) Transit benefits - tested with cost change

            Note :-
            1) As per new implementation the adjustements will appear at subrate level
            2) This item needs regression testing of adjustment for all benefit types

            Show
            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) added a comment - 3c's:- Concern :- Incorrect adjustments in case of multiple rates mapped to a plan Cause :- Adjustments for multiple rates were not handled properly Correction :- Handled Adjustments for multiple rate mapped to a plan. Implemented to show adjustments at subrate level Affected areas :- Adjustment of all benefit types Affected files :- OES_SP_GetRetroBillingDetails_InvoiceBenefitWise Tested following scenarios :- 1) Health benefits a) With two billed rates Retro enrollment and future enrollment Eligibility change of rates Cost change of one rate Cost swap of both rate Addition of new rate Tier change Change in cost of one subrate b) With two Self insured rates - tested all of above scenarios c) With one billed rate and other self insured rate - tested all of above scenarios 2) Non health benefits a) Life benefits - tested all of above with coverage change b) Transit benefits - tested with cost change Note :- 1) As per new implementation the adjustements will appear at subrate level 2) This item needs regression testing of adjustment for all benefit types
            khandu.kshirsagar Khandu Kshirsagar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Review(10208) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600)
            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) logged work - 02/May/17 04:07 PM
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               

              Code check-in, ticket update

            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Jyoti Agrawal [ jyoti.agrawal ] Sachin Hingole [ sachin.hingole ]
            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 119h [ 428400 ] 119.5h [ 430200 ]
            Worklog Id 42762 [ 42762 ]
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Status In Development [ 10007 ] Local Testing [ 10200 ]
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210)
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) logged work - 03/May/17 12:22 PM
            • Time Spent:
              8h
               

              Testing for Health Benefit plans

            Hide
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Jyoti Agrawal,

            After the fix on LB. I have verified the following scenarios on ASML company on LB:-

            1] Health Benefits :- a] With a single billed rate
            b] With two billed rates
            This is verified for Retro and Future enrollments both
            c] Also changed the eligibility of rates,cost change of one rate,swapping the cost one rate to other rate,added one new rate,tier change and also changed cost of only one subrate.
            d] Verified the above scenarios for Self Insured components also.
            e] Verified the above scenarios for one self insured component and one billed rate
            f] Verified the above scenarios for Add Term Policies.
            g] Now Non Health benefits plans are in testing will update once done

            Sachin Hingole,Prasanna Karlekar

            Thanks,
            Venkatesh

            Show
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Jyoti Agrawal , After the fix on LB. I have verified the following scenarios on ASML company on LB:- 1] Health Benefits :- a] With a single billed rate b] With two billed rates This is verified for Retro and Future enrollments both c] Also changed the eligibility of rates,cost change of one rate,swapping the cost one rate to other rate,added one new rate,tier change and also changed cost of only one subrate. d] Verified the above scenarios for Self Insured components also. e] Verified the above scenarios for one self insured component and one billed rate f] Verified the above scenarios for Add Term Policies. g] Now Non Health benefits plans are in testing will update once done Sachin Hingole , Prasanna Karlekar Thanks, Venkatesh
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 119.5h [ 430200 ] 127.5h [ 459000 ]
            Worklog Id 42901 [ 42901 ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) logged work - 03/May/17 07:00 PM
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               

              Code review (Not complete)

            rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Sachin Hingole [ sachin.hingole ] Venkatesh Pujari [ venkatesh.pujari ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) logged work - 04/May/17 07:30 PM
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               

              Code Review (Not Complete)

            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 127.5h [ 459000 ] 128h [ 460800 ]
            Worklog Id 43392 [ 43392 ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 128h [ 460800 ] 128.5h [ 462600 ]
            Worklog Id 43403 [ 43403 ]
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) logged work - 08/May/17 07:21 AM
            • Time Spent:
              2h
               

              Testing of non health plans

            Hide
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) added a comment -

            HI Jyoti Agrawal,

            Tested the Non health benefit plans scenarios like coverage change,transit cost change and also without cost change.

            Ready for Stage.

            Sachin Hingole,Prasanna Karlekar

            Thanks,
            Venkatesh

            Show
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) added a comment - HI Jyoti Agrawal , Tested the Non health benefit plans scenarios like coverage change,transit cost change and also without cost change. Ready for Stage. Sachin Hingole , Prasanna Karlekar Thanks, Venkatesh
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 128.5h [ 462600 ] 130.5h [ 469800 ]
            Worklog Id 43663 [ 43663 ]
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213)
            khandu.kshirsagar Khandu Kshirsagar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602)
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Local Testing [ 10200 ] Stage Testing [ 10201 ]
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: In Testing(10214)
            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) logged work - 15/May/17 03:58 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1h
               

              Data verification

            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) logged work - 15/May/17 05:16 PM
            • Time Spent:
              6.5h
               

              Testing on Stage

            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 130.5h [ 469800 ] 131.5h [ 473400 ]
            Worklog Id 45708 [ 45708 ]
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 131.5h [ 473400 ] 138h [ 496800 ]
            Worklog Id 45747 [ 45747 ]
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) logged work - 16/May/17 05:13 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1h
               

              Testing on Stage

            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 138h [ 496800 ] 139h [ 500400 ]
            Worklog Id 46190 [ 46190 ]
            Hide
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Jyoti Agrawal,

            After the fix on Stage. I have verified the following scenarios on on AFI For Hspl company:-
            1] Health Benefits :- a] With a single billed rate
            b] With two billed rates
            This is verified for Retro and Future enrollments both
            c] Also changed the eligibility of rates,cost change of one rate,swapping the cost one rate to other rate,added one new rate,tier change and also changed cost of only one subrate.
            d] Verified the above scenarios for Self Insured components also.
            e] Verified the above scenarios for one self insured component and one billed rate
            f] Verified the above scenarios for Add Term Policies.
            g]Tested the Non health benefit plans scenarios like coverage change,transit cost change and also without cost change.

            Ready for Production

            Prasanna Karlekar,Sachin Hingole

            Only one concern is that if we are blocking 2016 adjustments then why are they displayed on the Invoice of 2017 year.

            Thanks,
            Venkatesh

            Show
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Jyoti Agrawal , After the fix on Stage. I have verified the following scenarios on on AFI For Hspl company:- 1] Health Benefits :- a] With a single billed rate b] With two billed rates This is verified for Retro and Future enrollments both c] Also changed the eligibility of rates,cost change of one rate,swapping the cost one rate to other rate,added one new rate,tier change and also changed cost of only one subrate. d] Verified the above scenarios for Self Insured components also. e] Verified the above scenarios for one self insured component and one billed rate f] Verified the above scenarios for Add Term Policies. g]Tested the Non health benefit plans scenarios like coverage change,transit cost change and also without cost change. Ready for Production Prasanna Karlekar , Sachin Hingole Only one concern is that if we are blocking 2016 adjustments then why are they displayed on the Invoice of 2017 year. Thanks, Venkatesh
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 139h [ 500400 ] 141h [ 507600 ]
            Worklog Id 46221 [ 46221 ]
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: In Testing(10214) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Ready for Production(10217)
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) logged work - 17/May/17 06:23 PM
            • Time Spent:
              2h
               

              Testing on stage

            khandu.kshirsagar Khandu Kshirsagar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Ready for Production(10217) Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: Production Deployed(10221)
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Stage Testing [ 10201 ] Production Testing [ 10202 ]
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: Production Deployed(10221) Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: In Testing(10218)
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) logged work - 18/May/17 12:58 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1.25h
               

              Testing on production

            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 141h [ 507600 ] 142.25h [ 512100 ]
            Worklog Id 46752 [ 46752 ]
            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) logged work - 18/May/17 04:25 PM
            • Time Spent:
              0.25h
               

              code check-in on production

            jyoti.agrawal Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 142.25h [ 512100 ] 142.5h [ 513000 ]
            Worklog Id 46852 [ 46852 ]
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) logged work - 19/May/17 01:28 PM
            • Time Spent:
              3h
               

              Testing on Production

            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 142.5h [ 513000 ] 145.5h [ 523800 ]
            Worklog Id 47253 [ 47253 ]
            Hide
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Jyoti Agrawal,

            After the fix on Production. I have verified the following scenarios on AFI For Hspl company on Production:-
            1] Health Benefits :- a] With a single billed rate
            b] With two billed rates
            This is verified for Retro and Future enrollments both
            c] Also changed the eligibility of rates,cost change of one rate,swapping the cost one rate to other rate,added one new rate,tier change and also changed cost of only one subrate.
            d] Verified the above scenarios for Self Insured components also.
            e] Verified the above scenarios for one self insured component and one billed rate
            f] Verified the above scenarios for Add Term Policies.

            Now Non Health benefits plans are in testing will update once done

            Sachin Hingole

            Thanks,
            Venkatesh

            Show
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Jyoti Agrawal , After the fix on Production. I have verified the following scenarios on AFI For Hspl company on Production:- 1] Health Benefits :- a] With a single billed rate b] With two billed rates This is verified for Retro and Future enrollments both c] Also changed the eligibility of rates,cost change of one rate,swapping the cost one rate to other rate,added one new rate,tier change and also changed cost of only one subrate. d] Verified the above scenarios for Self Insured components also. e] Verified the above scenarios for one self insured component and one billed rate f] Verified the above scenarios for Add Term Policies. Now Non Health benefits plans are in testing will update once done Sachin Hingole Thanks, Venkatesh
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) logged work - 22/May/17 12:17 PM
            • Time Spent:
              2h
               

              Testing on Production

            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 145.5h [ 523800 ] 147.5h [ 531000 ]
            Worklog Id 47670 [ 47670 ]
            Hide
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) added a comment -

            HI Jyoti Agrawal,

            Tested the Non health benefit plans scenarios like coverage change,transit cost change and also without cost change.

            Sachin Hingole,Prasanna Karlekar

            Thanks,
            Venkatesh

            Show
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) added a comment - HI Jyoti Agrawal , Tested the Non health benefit plans scenarios like coverage change,transit cost change and also without cost change. Sachin Hingole , Prasanna Karlekar Thanks, Venkatesh
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: In Testing(10218) Parent values: Production Complete(10222)Level 1 values: Closed(10223)
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Resolution Fixed [ 1 ]
            Status Production Testing [ 10202 ] Production Complete [ 10028 ]
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Production Complete [ 10028 ] Closed [ 6 ]
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 147.5h [ 531000 ] 150.5h [ 541800 ]
            Worklog Id 47888 [ 47888 ]
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) logged work - 23/May/17 06:47 PM
            • Time Spent:
              3h
               
              <No comment>
            satyap Satya made changes -
            Environment_New LB [ 18444 ]
            Transition Time In Source Status Execution Times
            Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made transition -
            Open In Development
            58d 7h 18m 1
            Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made transition -
            In Development In LB Testing
            74d 12h 12m 1
            Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made transition -
            In LB Testing Stage Testing
            12d 1h 17m 1
            Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made transition -
            Stage Testing In Production Testing
            3d 7h 9m 1
            Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made transition -
            In Production Testing Production Complete
            4d 18h 6m 1
            Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made transition -
            Production Complete Closed
            2s 1

              People

              Assignee:
              venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive)
              Reporter:
              alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive)
              Developer:
              Jyoti Agrawal (Inactive)
              QA:
              Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              3 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:
                Dev Due Date:
                Code Review Date:

                  Time Tracking

                  Estimated:
                  Original Estimate - 3h Original Estimate - 3h
                  3h
                  Remaining:
                  Remaining Estimate - 0h
                  0h
                  Logged:
                  Time Spent - 150.5h
                  150.5h