Ramya Tantry (Inactive)
added a comment - Hi Jennifer Leugers ,
We have re-run the above mentioned report.
Please refer latest run for verification.
CC: Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar , Sachin Hingole
Jennifer Leugers
added a comment - Hi all - need to load employees for USE; they need to be under EIN 440470840 (USEngineering Company) and in class US Engineering.
Sachin Hingole (Inactive)
added a comment - Hi Smita Pawar ,
Can you please look into this.
Thanks,
Sachin Hingole
Ramya Tantry Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar Rakesh Roy
We have imported records in USE company.
Import summary is as follows
1.Among 1272 employees, 646 employees were already present in the database
2.We have imported rest 626 employees in workterra system
3.Bad records are as follows
521276242 Address Invalid format
200567764 Error(s): DOB: Date should be in range: 01/01/1900 - 06/06/2079 (mm/dd/yyyy)
522976419 Error(s): Postal Code: Invalid Postal Code
We have Rerun below mentioned reports
1.1095 C U.S. Engineering Company
2.U.S. Engineering Company Holdings
3.1095 C U.S. Engineering Innovations
4.1095 C U.S. Engineering Company Legacy Brach2
Steps to download latest run as follows.
Please refer latest run, steps to down reports are as follows.
1.Login to Production with Partner.
2.Edit company City of Redding For Hspl.
3.Navigate to "Home >> Company Home >> BenAdmin Home >> BenAdmin Company Home >> ACA >> IRS Report".
4.Edit Reports.
5.Click on Show Runs and wait till "ACA Report Finalization" pop up to open.
6.Download zip folder for latest RUN by clicking on Download link.
Let us know if you need any additional information.
Smita Pawar (Inactive)
added a comment - Hi Jennifer,
We have imported records in USE company.
Import summary is as follows
1.Among 1272 employees, 646 employees were already present in the database
2.We have imported rest 626 employees in workterra system
3.Bad records are as follows
521276242 Address Invalid format
200567764 Error(s): DOB: Date should be in range: 01/01/1900 - 06/06/2079 (mm/dd/yyyy)
522976419 Error(s): Postal Code: Invalid Postal Code
We have Rerun below mentioned reports
1.1095 C U.S. Engineering Company
2.U.S. Engineering Company Holdings
3.1095 C U.S. Engineering Innovations
4.1095 C U.S. Engineering Company Legacy Brach2
Steps to download latest run as follows.
Please refer latest run, steps to down reports are as follows.
1.Login to Production with Partner.
2.Edit company City of Redding For Hspl.
3.Navigate to "Home >> Company Home >> BenAdmin Home >> BenAdmin Company Home >> ACA >> IRS Report".
4.Edit Reports.
5.Click on Show Runs and wait till "ACA Report Finalization" pop up to open.
6.Download zip folder for latest RUN by clicking on Download link.
Let us know if you need any additional information.
Thanks,
Smita
FYI Sachin Hingole , Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar , Ramya Tantry
Hi all - these folks are all Union employees and thus should all have a 1H / 2E for any months in which they were eligible. We have created a Union Class 1 and have set the new hire rule correctly for this group. Could you reload the attached and make sure the codes come out correctly? 2016 USE ACA Audit UPDATED.xlsx
Jennifer Leugers
added a comment - Hi all - these folks are all Union employees and thus should all have a 1H / 2E for any months in which they were eligible. We have created a Union Class 1 and have set the new hire rule correctly for this group. Could you reload the attached and make sure the codes come out correctly? 2016 USE ACA Audit UPDATED.xlsx
Mahendra Mungase (Inactive)
added a comment - Hi Jennifer Leugers
We have re run -"1095 C U.S. Engineering Company" for Union Class and observed that 1H/2E present.
Please download latest run - 2/22/2017 10:58:26 PM.
Note- We have consider Company EIN - 440470840 for this run
Please review and let us know for any query
Thanks
For USE, I’m trying to run the Union group out (1095C U.S. Engineering Company Union) but when I do, it says there are no records found. This is in regards to JIRA 7337.
Revansiddha Gaur (Inactive)
added a comment - Mail Text From Jennifer
Hi all –
For USE, I’m trying to run the Union group out (1095C U.S. Engineering Company Union) but when I do, it says there are no records found. This is in regards to JIRA 7337.
Could you please look into this?
Thanks,
Jen
Revansiddha Gaur (Inactive)
added a comment - Hi Jennifer Leugers ,
I ran the 1095C U.S. Engineering Company Union. Please find this run..
Regards,
Revan
Smita Pawar Mahendra Mungase Sachin Hingole Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar
Jennifer Leugers
added a comment - Hi all - can you reload the Union people and rerun the forms? The client is saying they changed in the last run we did.
Revansiddha Gaur (Inactive)
added a comment - Hi Jennifer Leugers ,
We don't understand that what we need to reload the union people? & there is no such file uploaded in the jira to reload. Thanks!
Smita Pawar Sachin Hingole Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar
All - we defaulted the Union people to 1H/2E but when I combined the runs and ran the final, those individuals codes changed. Please refer to my comments that I have on this same ticket from 2.22.17. Really need this done on priority as I need to get their approvals in order to get their filing done.
Jennifer Leugers
added a comment - All - we defaulted the Union people to 1H/2E but when I combined the runs and ran the final, those individuals codes changed. Please refer to my comments that I have on this same ticket from 2.22.17. Really need this done on priority as I need to get their approvals in order to get their filing done.
Debbie Kulling FYI
We have rerun "1095C U.S. Engineering Company Union" report.Please refer latest run to download report
Actually while running the report "Eligibility Rule for Multi Employer" was not set to union only hence codes where not reflecting correctly.
Let us know if you need any additional information.
Smita Pawar (Inactive)
added a comment - Hi Jennifer Leugers ,
We have rerun "1095C U.S. Engineering Company Union" report.Please refer latest run to download report
Actually while running the report "Eligibility Rule for Multi Employer" was not set to union only hence codes where not reflecting correctly.
Let us know if you need any additional information.
Thanks,
Smita
FYI Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar , Sachin Hingole , Kumar Chhajed , Revansiddha Gaur
thanks all - but the Union folks are not their own EIN so we need them to be in the run with the rest of EIN 440470840 so we can submit their 1094 with all of the forms together.
Jennifer Leugers
added a comment - thanks all - but the Union folks are not their own EIN so we need them to be in the run with the rest of EIN 440470840 so we can submit their 1094 with all of the forms together.
Smita Pawar (Inactive)
added a comment - Hi Jennifer Leugers ,
We have Updated EIN's for USE Union folks and rerun the report "1095C U.S. Engineering Company Union".
Please download latest report.
Let us know, if you need any additional information.
Thanks,
Smita
FYI Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar , Sachin Hingole , Revansiddha Gaur , Kumar Chhajed
Hi all - the client is asking why page 2 on their 1094 for the "Company" does not have the Union employees counts (it does on the # of forms but not in the columns for the FTE counts). I assume the Union employees are not supposed to be included but could you please 1) confirm and 2) provide the IRS statement that led us to this logic? Thanks!
Jennifer Leugers
added a comment - Hi all - the client is asking why page 2 on their 1094 for the "Company" does not have the Union employees counts (it does on the # of forms but not in the columns for the FTE counts). I assume the Union employees are not supposed to be included but could you please 1) confirm and 2) provide the IRS statement that led us to this logic? Thanks!
Debbie Kulling
Kumar Chhajed (Inactive)
added a comment - Hi Jennifer Leugers ,
We are working on this and let you the details by tomorrow
.
CC Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar Ramya Tantry Revansiddha Gaur Smita Pawar
System should display UNION employees on 1094c III a,b and C columns,
Workterra implementation:
we have assumed that 1H means no offer of coverage and 2E means multi employer so including these employees will affect MEC offer indicatoer so we have not included this.
Correction:
We need to change software to include the 1H/2E employees on 1094c part ||| a,b,c column.
Following Employers has used the 1H/2E functionality from Workterra for Tax year 2016.
Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar (Inactive)
added a comment - - edited Hi Jennifer Leugers ,
AS per this link
System should display UNION employees on 1094c III a,b and C columns,
Workterra implementation :
we have assumed that 1H means no offer of coverage and 2E means multi employer so including these employees will affect MEC offer indicatoer so we have not included this.
Correction :
We need to change software to include the 1H/2E employees on 1094c part ||| a,b,c column.
Following Employers has used the 1H/2E functionality from Workterra for Tax year 2016.
Sr.No
CompanyName
ReportName
Total Employee Count
1
Town of Cary
2016 1095C for TOC
1
2
LHP
2016 1095C for Montclair
330
3
SBM
2016 1095C for SBM
2378
4
USE
1095 C U.S. Engineering Company
1140
5
JE Dunn
2016 1095C JE DUNN
68
6
Gelson market
1095C
14
Hi Nandu - when will this update be in WORKTERRA? I need to at least give an ETA to the clients of when we think we can get their replacement files to the IRS.
Jennifer Leugers
added a comment - Hi Nandu - when will this update be in WORKTERRA? I need to at least give an ETA to the clients of when we think we can get their replacement files to the IRS.
We are implementing this and will deploy the patch on production on Wednesday (04/26/2017). Let us know if anything else need to be considered related to this.
Kumar Chhajed (Inactive)
added a comment - - edited Hi Jennifer Leugers ,
We are implementing this and will deploy the patch on production on Wednesday (04/26/2017). Let us know if anything else need to be considered related to this.
CC Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar Revansiddha Gaur Smita Pawar
We have deployed patch for this. Please refer Jira WT-9275 for updated testing details.
We have rerun the report '1094C US Engineering Company' for verifying same.
Smita Pawar (Inactive)
added a comment - Hi Jennifer Leugers ,
We have deployed patch for this. Please refer Jira WT-9275 for updated testing details.
We have rerun the report '1094C US Engineering Company' for verifying same.
Let us know if you need any additional for same.
Thanks
FYI Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar , Sachin Hingole , Revansiddha Gaur , Kumar Chhajed
Hi Jennifer Leugers,
We have re-run the above mentioned report.
Please refer latest run for verification.
CC:Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar,Sachin Hingole