Uploaded image for project: 'WORKTERRA'
  1. WORKTERRA
  2. WT-7389

Same dependent displayed multiple times on 95C

    Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Critical
    • Resolution: Done
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: ACA
    • Labels:
      None
    • Environment:
      QA
    • Module:
      ACA
    • Reported by:
      Harbinger
    • Item State:
      Production Complete - Closed
    • Issue Importance:
      Must Have

      Description

      Company - ACAAutomation
      EE SSN - 300000174
      Dep SSN - 300000191
      Template - ACA Correction 1095 C Part III EmpID Dependent
      1095 C- 1095C 27Dec16 223

      Step To Repro -

      1.Login to application
      2.Add new employee + child
      3.Enrolled into medical plan - WT_4579
      4.Now run 1095C
      5.Import dependent code correction
      6.Edit 95C and select "Apply User Correction" - Yes
      7.Click on "Save and Run"

      Actual - same dependent record repeat

      Expected - It should display only one record

      Screen Shot - Repeat_Dependent_Displayed_On_95C.jpg

        Attachments

        1. 7389.png
          7389.png
          180 kB
        2. Import.txt
          0.7 kB
        3. LB Retesting.png
          LB Retesting.png
          184 kB
        4. Repeat_Dependent_Displayed_On_95C.jpg
          Repeat_Dependent_Displayed_On_95C.jpg
          184 kB

          Issue Links

            Activity

            mahendra.mungase Mahendra Mungase (Inactive) created issue -
            mahendra.mungase Mahendra Mungase (Inactive) made changes -
            Field Original Value New Value
            Link This issue causes WT-4579 [ WT-4579 ]
            mahendra.mungase Mahendra Mungase (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment Import.txt [ 36036 ]
            mahendra.mungase Mahendra Mungase (Inactive) made changes -
            Description Company - ACAAutomation
            EE SSN - 300000174
            Dep SSN - 300000191

            Step To Repro -

            1.Login to application
            2.Add new employee + child
            3.Enrolled into medical plan - WT_4579
            4.Now run 1095C
            5.Import dependent code correction
            6.Edit 95C and select "Apply User Correction" - Yes
            7.Click on "Save and Run"

            Actual - same dependent record repeat

            Expected - It should display only one record

            Screen Shot - Repeat_Dependent_Displayed_On_95C.jpg
            Company - ACAAutomation
            EE SSN - 300000174
            Dep SSN - 300000191
            Template - ACA Correction 1095 C Part III EmpID Dependent
            1095 C- 1095C 27Dec16 223

            Step To Repro -

            1.Login to application
            2.Add new employee + child
            3.Enrolled into medical plan - WT_4579
            4.Now run 1095C
            5.Import dependent code correction
            6.Edit 95C and select "Apply User Correction" - Yes
            7.Click on "Save and Run"

            Actual - same dependent record repeat

            Expected - It should display only one record

            Screen Shot - Repeat_Dependent_Displayed_On_95C.jpg


            revansiddha.gaur Revansiddha Gaur (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Revansiddha Gaur [ revansiddha.gaur ] Ramya Tantry [ ramya.tantry ]
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) logged work - 03/Jan/17 12:18 PM - edited
            • Time Spent:
              2.5h
               

              analysis and coding

            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 4h [ 14400 ]
            Original Estimate 4h [ 14400 ]
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 4h [ 14400 ] 2h [ 7200 ]
            Time Spent 2h [ 7200 ]
            Worklog Id 16862 [ 16862 ]
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 2h [ 7200 ] 1.5h [ 5400 ]
            Time Spent 2h [ 7200 ] 2.5h [ 9000 ]
            Worklog Id 16862 [ 16862 ]
            Hide
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment -

            Files Affected:

            Database Objects/MasterCompanyDB/04_Stored Procedures/dbo.OES_SP_Get_ACAIRS1095CData.StoredProcedure.sql

            Show
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment - Files Affected: Database Objects/MasterCompanyDB/04_Stored Procedures/dbo.OES_SP_Get_ACAIRS1095CData.StoredProcedure.sql
            Hide
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment -

            Concern:Same dependent displayed multiple times on 95C
            Cause:As per earlier implementation, we have considered total 18 covered individual.But we changed this implementation as we were not able to maintain sequence number while importing and also we removed the blank records from covered individual table. While merging the code,we consider only EmployeeId and sequence no. Now since only Dependent codes are imported,Its internal sequence number comes to be 1.
            This employee and child is already enrolled in plan so originally he comes up with sequence number 1 and 2 respectively. Due to the join condition in merge, the details of employee is updated with correction data of child.
            Correction: We have removed sequence number and added mermberid and membertypeid while merging.We are updating the sequence number at the last after all data is merged.

            Please verify the same scenario from ACA 1095C corrections screen
            Also verify WT-6332 scenario as we removed mermberid and membertypeid from join condition to resolve this issue.

            Note: As per changes done for WT-4970, we are merging Correction covered individual with original covered individual table.
            For .eg.: If EE and or dependents is already covered for a month and data is imported in such a way that it shows uncovered for that month,we are not allowing this.

            Show
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment - Concern :Same dependent displayed multiple times on 95C Cause :As per earlier implementation, we have considered total 18 covered individual.But we changed this implementation as we were not able to maintain sequence number while importing and also we removed the blank records from covered individual table. While merging the code,we consider only EmployeeId and sequence no. Now since only Dependent codes are imported,Its internal sequence number comes to be 1. This employee and child is already enrolled in plan so originally he comes up with sequence number 1 and 2 respectively. Due to the join condition in merge, the details of employee is updated with correction data of child. Correction : We have removed sequence number and added mermberid and membertypeid while merging.We are updating the sequence number at the last after all data is merged. Please verify the same scenario from ACA 1095C corrections screen Also verify WT-6332 scenario as we removed mermberid and membertypeid from join condition to resolve this issue. Note: As per changes done for WT-4970 , we are merging Correction covered individual with original covered individual table. For .eg.: If EE and or dependents is already covered for a month and data is imported in such a way that it shows uncovered for that month,we are not allowing this.
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Open [ 1 ] In Development [ 10007 ]
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
            Status In Development [ 10007 ] Local Testing [ 10200 ]
            khandu.kshirsagar Khandu Kshirsagar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600)
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) logged work - 04/Jan/17 11:20 AM
            • Time Spent:
              0.75h
               

              Testing
              Draft reply
              LB checkin

            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Ramya Tantry [ ramya.tantry ] Mahendra Mungase [ mahendra.mungase ]
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Mahendra Mungase [ mahendra.mungase ] Smita Pawar [ smita.pawar ]
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210)
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 1.5h [ 5400 ] 0.75h [ 2700 ]
            Time Spent 2.5h [ 9000 ] 3.25h [ 11700 ]
            Worklog Id 17132 [ 17132 ]
            Hide
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment -

            We have verified above mentioned issue on LB company. Its working fine.
            PFA screen shot of verified employee.
            Tested scenarios are as follows.
            1.Checked whether employee details are reflected on 1095-C PDF.
            2.Checked whether employee's dependents are not displaying twice
            3.Checked whether covered individual box is checked

            Show
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment - We have verified above mentioned issue on LB company. Its working fine. PFA screen shot of verified employee. Tested scenarios are as follows. 1.Checked whether employee details are reflected on 1095-C PDF. 2.Checked whether employee's dependents are not displaying twice 3.Checked whether covered individual box is checked
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
            Original Estimate 4h [ 14400 ] 7h [ 25200 ]
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment LB Retesting.png [ 36609 ]
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) logged work - 04/Jan/17 01:43 PM - edited
            • Time Spent:
              2h
               
              <No comment>
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 0.75h [ 2700 ] 0h [ 0 ]
            Time Spent 3.25h [ 11700 ] 4.75h [ 17100 ]
            Worklog Id 17206 [ 17206 ]
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 4.75h [ 17100 ] 5.25h [ 18900 ]
            Worklog Id 17206 [ 17206 ]
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) logged work - 05/Jan/17 01:42 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1h
               

              LB testing of W-63632

            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
            Original Estimate 7h [ 25200 ] 10h [ 36000 ]
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 5.25h [ 18900 ] 6.25h [ 22500 ]
            Worklog Id 17563 [ 17563 ]
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213)
            khandu.kshirsagar Khandu Kshirsagar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602)
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Smita Pawar [ smita.pawar ] Mahendra Mungase [ mahendra.mungase ]
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: In Testing(10214)
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Local Testing [ 10200 ] Stage Testing [ 10201 ]
            rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: In Testing(10214) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Ready for Production(10217)
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) made changes -
            Code Reviewed By Nandkumar Karlekar [ 11904 ]
            ashwin.wankhede Ashwin Wankhede (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Ready for Production(10217) Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: Production Deployed(10221)
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: Production Deployed(10221) Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: In Testing(10218)
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Stage Testing [ 10201 ] Production Testing [ 10202 ]
            Hide
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment -

            We have verified above mentioned issue on Production company. Its working fine.
            PFA screen shot of verified employee.
            T
            ested scenarios are as follows.

            1.Checked whether employee details are reflected on 1095-C PDF.
            2.Checked whether employee's dependents are not displaying twice
            3.Checked whether covered individual box is checked

            Show
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment - We have verified above mentioned issue on Production company. Its working fine. PFA screen shot of verified employee. T ested scenarios are as follows. 1.Checked whether employee details are reflected on 1095-C PDF. 2.Checked whether employee's dependents are not displaying twice 3.Checked whether covered individual box is checked
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) logged work - 11/Jan/17 01:31 PM
            • Time Spent:
              0.75h
               

              Production testing

            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment 7389.png [ 37118 ]
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: In Testing(10218) Parent values: Production Complete(10222)Level 1 values: Closed(10223)
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 6.25h [ 22500 ] 7h [ 25200 ]
            Worklog Id 18481 [ 18481 ]
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
            Resolution Fixed [ 1 ]
            Status Production Testing [ 10202 ] Production Complete [ 10028 ]
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Production Complete [ 10028 ] Closed [ 6 ]
            satyap Satya made changes -
            Environment_New LB [ 18444 ]
            Transition Time In Source Status Execution Times
            Smita Pawar (Inactive) made transition -
            Open In Development
            8d 21m 1
            Smita Pawar (Inactive) made transition -
            In Development In LB Testing
            7s 1
            Smita Pawar (Inactive) made transition -
            In LB Testing Stage Testing
            2d 2h 52m 1
            Smita Pawar (Inactive) made transition -
            Stage Testing In Production Testing
            4d 23h 44m 1
            Smita Pawar (Inactive) made transition -
            In Production Testing Production Complete
            14m 30s 1
            Smita Pawar (Inactive) made transition -
            Production Complete Closed
            2s 1

              People

              Assignee:
              mahendra.mungase Mahendra Mungase (Inactive)
              Reporter:
              mahendra.mungase Mahendra Mungase (Inactive)
              Developer:
              Revansiddha Gaur (Inactive)
              QA:
              Mahendra Mungase (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              3 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:

                  Time Tracking

                  Estimated:
                  Original Estimate - 10h
                  10h
                  Remaining:
                  Remaining Estimate - 0h
                  0h
                  Logged:
                  Time Spent - 7h Time Not Required
                  7h