Uploaded image for project: 'WORKTERRA'
  1. WORKTERRA
  2. WT-7421

"covered all 12 months" check box is not checked if "00" month index is imported into system

    Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Critical
    • Resolution: Done
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: ACA
    • Labels:
      None
    • Environment:
      QA
    • Module:
      ACA
    • Reported by:
      Harbinger
    • Item State:
      Production Complete - Closed

      Description

      Pre-requisite -
      1.Add Employee SSN - 300000179
      2.Add child – SSN – 300000197
      3.ACA Plan should be self insured
      4.Create file with Month Index = “00” and other valid value for other fields
      5.Import Tempate - ACA Correction 1095 C Part III EmpID Dependent
      6.95C Report Name - 1095C 28 Dec16 437

      Screen Shot - 300000179_AllMonth_Check_Box_Did_Not_Check.jpg

      Step To Repro -
      1.Login to application
      2.Navigate to Import/Export > Manual Import/Export > Select Import radio button.
      3.Select template from drop down and browse file.
      4.Click on Import
      5.Run 95C with "Apply User Correction" - Yes
      6.Download the file

      Actual- Only Jan month check box is checked

      Expected - It should check "covered all 12 months" checkbox

        Attachments

        1. 300000179_AllMonth_Check_Box_Did_Not_Check.jpg
          300000179_AllMonth_Check_Box_Did_Not_Check.jpg
          142 kB
        2. 7421.png
          7421.png
          159 kB
        3. 7421-Prod.png
          7421-Prod.png
          171 kB
        4. Import.txt
          0.1 kB

          Issue Links

            Activity

            Hide
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment -

            This Issue is valid but customization is not valid.
            Please ensure that dependents alone are not enrolled in a plan without employee.
            Please maintain this while importing correction data also.

            *Files affected: *
            Database Objects/MasterCompanyDB/04_Stored Procedures/dbo.OES_SP_Get_ACAIRS1095CData.StoredProcedure.sql

            Show
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment - This Issue is valid but customization is not valid. Please ensure that dependents alone are not enrolled in a plan without employee. Please maintain this while importing correction data also. *Files affected: * Database Objects/MasterCompanyDB/04_Stored Procedures/dbo.OES_SP_Get_ACAIRS1095CData.StoredProcedure.sql
            Hide
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment -

            We have verified above mentioned issue on LB company [ACA Automation].
            Its working fine.
            PFA screen shot of verified employee.

            Show
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment - We have verified above mentioned issue on LB company [ACA Automation] . Its working fine. PFA screen shot of verified employee.
            Hide
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment -

            Concern: "covered all 12 months" check box is not checked if "00" month index is imported into system
            Cause: For import related changes, we removed sequence number. As there was sequence number mismatch, data did not get updated.
            Correction: We have removed sequence number from the table and are updating the sequence number on the Final table of covered individual

            Show
            ramya.tantry Ramya Tantry (Inactive) added a comment - Concern : "covered all 12 months" check box is not checked if "00" month index is imported into system Cause : For import related changes, we removed sequence number. As there was sequence number mismatch, data did not get updated. Correction : We have removed sequence number from the table and are updating the sequence number on the Final table of covered individual
            Hide
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment -

            We have verified above mentioned issue on Production company [Marquette For HSPL].
            Its working fine.
            PFA screen shot of verified employee.

            Show
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment - We have verified above mentioned issue on Production company [Marquette For HSPL] . Its working fine. PFA screen shot of verified employee.

              People

              Assignee:
              smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive)
              Reporter:
              mahendra.mungase Mahendra Mungase (Inactive)
              Developer:
              Revansiddha Gaur (Inactive)
              QA:
              Mahendra Mungase (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              3 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:

                  Time Tracking

                  Estimated:
                  Original Estimate - 4h
                  4h
                  Remaining:
                  Time Spent - 2.5h Remaining Estimate - 1.5h
                  1.5h
                  Logged:
                  Time Spent - 2.5h Remaining Estimate - 1.5h
                  2.5h