WORKTERRAProject Type: software

WORKTERRA

Uploaded image for project: 'WORKTERRA'
  1. WORKTERRA
  2. WT-9147

Can we suppress enrollment with zero coverage from pulling on the report?

    Details

    • Type: Enhancement
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Medium
    • Resolution: Cancelled
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: BenAdmin
    • Labels:
      None
    • Module:
      BenAdmin - Report
    • Reported by:
      Client
    • Company:
      Clarke
    • Item State:
      LB QA - On Hold
    • Sprint:
      WT Sprint 38 - Enhancement
    • Severity:
      Simple

      Description

      A report was run for Clarke. the 0-24 tier has 1 enrollment with zero coverage. I ran a report and there is only one person in that age band and her election is pending EOI so she has no Current coverage amount. Can we suppress these from pulling on the report?

        Attachments

          Issue Links

          is blocked by

          Bug - A problem which impairs or prevents the functions of the product. WB-327 Issue with coverage in Billing Summary Report for plans having family rate customization

          • High - Serious problem that could block progress.
          • Closed

            Activity

            Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
            aditya.vishwakarma Aditya Vishwakarma (Inactive) created issue -
            aditya.vishwakarma Aditya Vishwakarma (Inactive) made changes -
            Field Original Value New Value
            Assignee Vijay Siddha [ vijays ] Aditya Vishwakarma [ aditya.vishwakarma ]
            aditya.vishwakarma Aditya Vishwakarma (Inactive) made changes -
            Summary Can we suppress these from pulling on the report? Can we suppress enrollment with zero coverage from pulling on the report?
            aditya.vishwakarma Aditya Vishwakarma (Inactive) made changes -
            Description A report was run for Clarke. the 0-24 tier has 1 enrollment with zero coverage. I ran a report and there is only one person in that age band and her election is pending EOI so she has no Current coverage amount. Can we suppress these from pulling on the report?

            		 A report was run for Clarke. the 0-24 tier has 1 enrollment with zero coverage. I ran a report and there is only one person in that age band and her election is pending EOI so she has no Current coverage amount. Can we suppress these from pulling on the report?
             !screenshot-3.png|thumbnail!

            Permalink
            aditya.vishwakarma Aditya Vishwakarma (Inactive) logged work - 10/Apr/17 02:23 PM
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               

              Analysis
              Jira creation and reply

            Hide
            Permalink
            aditya.vishwakarma Aditya Vishwakarma (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hello Debbie Kulling

            Currently we are displaying Approved enrollments only we doesn't check for EOI pending records on billing summary reports.
            If we suppress such records it will affect the volume of premiums and enrollment counts.

            Can you please share your views on this?

            Thanks

            cc:Prasanna Karlekar

            Show
            aditya.vishwakarma Aditya Vishwakarma (Inactive) added a comment - Hello Debbie Kulling Currently we are displaying Approved enrollments only we doesn't check for EOI pending records on billing summary reports. If we suppress such records it will affect the volume of premiums and enrollment counts. Can you please share your views on this? Thanks cc: Prasanna Karlekar
            aditya.vishwakarma Aditya Vishwakarma (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 8h [ 28800 ] 7.5h [ 27000 ]
            Time Spent 0.5h [ 1800 ]
            Worklog Id 37293 [ 37293 ]
            aditya.vishwakarma Aditya Vishwakarma (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Aditya Vishwakarma [ aditya.vishwakarma ] Debbie Kulling [ dkulling ]
            Hide
            Permalink
            dkulling Debbie Kulling added a comment -

            If we are not pulling pending EOI records why does it show up in the enrollment count? The employee is pending with zero coverage but the report is still showing 1 person enrolled?

            Show
            dkulling Debbie Kulling added a comment - If we are not pulling pending EOI records why does it show up in the enrollment count? The employee is pending with zero coverage but the report is still showing 1 person enrolled?
            Hide
            Permalink
            dkulling Debbie Kulling added a comment -

            I need an update on this issue. Is it still be worked on.

            Show
            dkulling Debbie Kulling added a comment - I need an update on this issue. Is it still be worked on.
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Debbie Kulling [ dkulling ] Prasanna Karlekar [ prasanna ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Analysis(10204) Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: On Hold(10207)
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) made changes -
            Sprint WT Sprint 38 - Enhancement [ 88 ]
            Hide
            Permalink
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Debbie Kulling,

            Apologies for the late response

            We are picking this issue up in Sprint 38 - Enhancement Sprint post Dave's approval. Will update the ETA by 9/25/17

            Regards
            Gaurav

            Aditya VishwakarmaPrasanna Karlekar

            Show
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Debbie Kulling , Apologies for the late response We are picking this issue up in Sprint 38 - Enhancement Sprint post Dave's approval. Will update the ETA by 9/25/17 Regards Gaurav Aditya Vishwakarma Prasanna Karlekar
            Permalink
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) logged work - 23/Sep/17 06:04 AM
            • Time Spent:
              4.5h
               

              Try to repro Issue and Analysis
              Check existing code implementation

            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 7.5h [ 27000 ] 3h [ 10800 ]
            Time Spent 0.5h [ 1800 ] 5h [ 18000 ]
            Worklog Id 80941 [ 80941 ]
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) made changes -
            Dev Due Date 28/Sep/2017
            Dev Estimates 30
            Permalink
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) logged work - 26/Sep/17 07:30 PM
            • Time Spent:
              0.25h
               

              Discussion on findings for Billing Summary Report

            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Prasanna Karlekar [ prasanna ] Parmeshwar Jumbad [ parmeshwar.jumbade ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Dev Due Date 28/Sep/2017 29/Sep/2017
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: On Hold(10207) Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Progress(10206)
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Progress(10206) Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Review(10208)
            Hide
            Permalink
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) added a comment -

            Description:
            With existing implementation there was no check available to pulling records on report even if enrollment having specific coverage (i.e. zero or non-zero) . Now we have added condition that only includes non-zero coverage enrollments on report.

            Affected Files: MasterCompanyDB/04_Stored Procedures/dbo.OES_SP_Report_GetBillingSummary.StoredProcedure.sql

            Affected Areas: Billing summary report

            Tested Scenarios:
            1. Verified Life and Health benefit type records
            2. Verified records with zero coverage and non-zero coverage.

            CC: Prasanna Karlekar

            Show
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) added a comment - Description : With existing implementation there was no check available to pulling records on report even if enrollment having specific coverage (i.e. zero or non-zero) . Now we have added condition that only includes non-zero coverage enrollments on report. Affected Files : MasterCompanyDB/04_Stored Procedures/dbo.OES_SP_Report_GetBillingSummary.StoredProcedure.sql Affected Areas : Billing summary report Tested Scenarios : 1. Verified Life and Health benefit type records 2. Verified records with zero coverage and non-zero coverage. CC: Prasanna Karlekar
            Permalink
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) logged work - 28/Sep/17 10:31 AM
            • Time Spent:
              6h
               

              Document creation
              Internal discussion
              Daily stand up
              Review request
              Remaining Unit testing

            Hide
            Permalink
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Sachin Hingole,

            We do not know, exact scenarios from where 0 coverage can come into system.
            It will be helpful, if we get test scenarios for this enhancement before we push it to LB.

            Thank you!

            cc: Gaurav Sodani, Rakesh Roy, [~parmeshwar.jumbade]

            Show
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Sachin Hingole , We do not know, exact scenarios from where 0 coverage can come into system. It will be helpful, if we get test scenarios for this enhancement before we push it to LB. Thank you! cc: Gaurav Sodani , Rakesh Roy , [~parmeshwar.jumbade]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Status New Request [ 10029 ] Pending for Approval [ 10002 ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Pending for Approval [ 10002 ] Approved for Development [ 10003 ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Approved for Development [ 10003 ] In Development [ 10007 ]
            Hide
            Permalink
            sachin.hingole Sachin Hingole (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Venkatesh Pujari Rashmita Dudhe [~meghana joshi],

            Can you please help development for scenario mentioned in above comment.

            Thanks,
            Sachin

            Gaurav Sodani Rakesh Roy [~parmeshwar.jumbade]

            Show
            sachin.hingole Sachin Hingole (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Venkatesh Pujari Rashmita Dudhe [~meghana joshi] , Can you please help development for scenario mentioned in above comment. Thanks, Sachin Gaurav Sodani Rakesh Roy [~parmeshwar.jumbade]
            Permalink
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) logged work - 28/Sep/17 10:00 PM
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               

              Document review
              Discussion

            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment Billing Summary Report- Enhancement.doc [ 63053 ]
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 3h [ 10800 ] 0h [ 0 ]
            Time Spent 5h [ 18000 ] 11h [ 39600 ]
            Worklog Id 82661 [ 82661 ]
            Permalink
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) logged work - 29/Sep/17 10:33 AM
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               

              Changes after document review
              Added document into JIRA

            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 11h [ 39600 ] 11.5h [ 41400 ]
            Worklog Id 82662 [ 82662 ]
            Hide
            Permalink
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Gaurav Sodani,

            Keeping this JIRA On Hold.
            We have verified scenario which the client has mentioned. We need test cases for this as we are not much aware from where 0 coverage can be set for an election.

            Changing Dev Due Date to 4-Oct-2017. Hope that we get the test cases by 3-Oct-2017.

            Thank you!

            cc: [~parmeshwar.jumbade], Sachin Hingole

            Show
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Gaurav Sodani , Keeping this JIRA On Hold. We have verified scenario which the client has mentioned. We need test cases for this as we are not much aware from where 0 coverage can be set for an election. Changing Dev Due Date to 4-Oct-2017. Hope that we get the test cases by 3-Oct-2017. Thank you! cc: [~parmeshwar.jumbade] , Sachin Hingole
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Review(10208) Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: On Hold(10207)
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Dev Due Date 29/Sep/2017 04/Oct/2017
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 11.5h [ 41400 ] 11.75h [ 42300 ]
            Worklog Id 82732 [ 82732 ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 11.75h [ 42300 ] 12.25h [ 44100 ]
            Worklog Id 82747 [ 82747 ]
            meghana.joshi Meghana Joshi (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment WT- 9147 Test Cases.xls [ 63286 ]
            Hide
            Permalink
            meghana.joshi Meghana Joshi (Inactive) added a comment -

            PFA Test Cases WT- 9147 Test Cases.xls

            CC - Sachin Hingole

            Show
            meghana.joshi Meghana Joshi (Inactive) added a comment - PFA Test Cases WT- 9147 Test Cases.xls CC - Sachin Hingole
            meghana.joshi Meghana Joshi (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 12.25h [ 44100 ] 18.25h [ 65700 ]
            Worklog Id 82971 [ 82971 ]
            Permalink
            meghana.joshi Meghana Joshi (Inactive) logged work - 03/Oct/17 12:36 PM
            • Time Spent:
              6h
               

              Analysis
              Test Cases Writing

            Permalink
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) logged work - 05/Oct/17 01:30 AM
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               

              Code review - In Progress

            Permalink
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) logged work - 05/Oct/17 04:08 AM
            • Time Spent:
              6.5h
               

              Internal discussion related to test cases
              Unit testing based on test-cases

            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) made changes -
            Dev Due Date 04/Oct/2017 05/Oct/2017
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: On Hold(10207) Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Progress(10206)
            Permalink
            meghana.joshi Meghana Joshi (Inactive) logged work - 05/Oct/17 12:59 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1h
               

              Internal discussion with Parmeshwar

            meghana.joshi Meghana Joshi (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 18.25h [ 65700 ] 19.25h [ 69300 ]
            Worklog Id 83416 [ 83416 ]
            Permalink
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) logged work - 05/Oct/17 06:30 PM
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               

              Scenario discussion
              Code review

            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 19.25h [ 69300 ] 25.75h [ 92700 ]
            Worklog Id 83470 [ 83470 ]
            Permalink
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) logged work - 06/Oct/17 04:11 AM
            • Time Spent:
              7h
               

              Internal discussion with QA related to Enrollment
              Verified scenarios provided by QA

            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 25.75h [ 92700 ] 32.75h [ 117900 ]
            Worklog Id 83474 [ 83474 ]
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) made changes -
            Dev Due Date 05/Oct/2017 06/Oct/2017
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment WT-9147 Code Review Checklist.docx [ 63670 ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Code Review Date 05/Oct/2017
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment WT- 9147 Test Cases_updated.xls [ 63671 ]
            Hide
            Permalink
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi [~meghana joshi],

            I have verified test-cases (marked in yellow color) provided by you for single benefit type and it is working as expected. Please find attached updated WT- 9147 Test Cases_updated.xls sheet (tested scenarios marked in yellow). All test-cases verified for SA login. Please do verify with all logins.

            CC: Prasanna Karlekar

            Show
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) added a comment - Hi [~meghana joshi] , I have verified test-cases (marked in yellow color) provided by you for single benefit type and it is working as expected. Please find attached updated WT- 9147 Test Cases_updated.xls sheet (tested scenarios marked in yellow). All test-cases verified for SA login. Please do verify with all logins. CC: Prasanna Karlekar
            Permalink
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) logged work - 06/Oct/17 12:14 PM - edited
            • Time Spent:
              4.5h
               

              Verified remaining testcases
              internal discussion
              Merge code changes into LB code branch
              JIRA update

            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 32.75h [ 117900 ] 36.25h [ 130500 ]
            Worklog Id 83606 [ 83606 ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Progress(10206) Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Local Testing(10209)
            khandu.kshirsagar Khandu Kshirsagar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Local Testing(10209) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600)
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Parmeshwar Jumbad [ parmeshwar.jumbade ] Sachin Hingole [ sachin.hingole ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Original Estimate 8h [ 28800 ] 30h [ 108000 ]
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 36.25h [ 130500 ] 37.25h [ 134100 ]
            Worklog Id 83606 [ 83606 ]
            sachin.hingole Sachin Hingole (Inactive) made changes -
            Status In Development [ 10007 ] Local Testing [ 10200 ]
            sachin.hingole Sachin Hingole (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Sachin Hingole [ sachin.hingole ] Meghana Joshi [ meghana.kulkarni ]
            sachin.hingole Sachin Hingole (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210)
            Permalink
            meghana.joshi Meghana Joshi (Inactive) logged work - 11/Oct/17 01:02 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1.5h
               
              <No comment>
            meghana.joshi Meghana Joshi (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 37.25h [ 134100 ] 38.75h [ 139500 ]
            Worklog Id 84283 [ 84283 ]
            meghana.joshi Meghana Joshi (Inactive) made changes -
            Production Due Date 26/Oct/2017
            Stage Due Date 23/Oct/17 [ 2017-10-23 ]
            Permalink
            meghana.joshi Meghana Joshi (Inactive) logged work - 13/Oct/17 11:06 AM
            • Time Spent:
              7h
               

              Testing on LB

            meghana.joshi Meghana Joshi (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 38.75h [ 139500 ] 45.75h [ 164700 ]
            Worklog Id 84831 [ 84831 ]
            Permalink
            meghana.joshi Meghana Joshi (Inactive) logged work - 17/Oct/17 12:18 PM
            • Time Spent:
              2h
               

              LB Testing

            meghana.joshi Meghana Joshi (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 45.75h [ 164700 ] 47.75h [ 171900 ]
            Worklog Id 85514 [ 85514 ]
            meghana.joshi Meghana Joshi (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213)
            Hide
            Permalink
            meghana.joshi Meghana Joshi (Inactive) added a comment -

            Verified all attached scenarios .

            Working Fine

            CC - Sachin Hingole

            Show
            meghana.joshi Meghana Joshi (Inactive) added a comment - Verified all attached scenarios . Working Fine CC - Sachin Hingole
            meghana.joshi Meghana Joshi (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 47.75h [ 171900 ] 49.75h [ 179100 ]
            Worklog Id 85517 [ 85517 ]
            Permalink
            meghana.joshi Meghana Joshi (Inactive) logged work - 18/Oct/17 12:02 PM
            • Time Spent:
              2h
               

              LB Testing

            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Developer Parmeshwar Jumbad [ parmeshwar.jumbade ]
            Hide
            Permalink
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) added a comment -

            Can not pushed this on stage environment because of WT-9409.

            CC: Prasanna Karlekar Sachin Hingole

            Show
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) added a comment - Can not pushed this on stage environment because of WT-9409 . CC: Prasanna Karlekar Sachin Hingole
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) made changes -
            Link This issue relates to WT-9409 [ WT-9409 ]
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) made changes -
            Link This issue relates to WT-9409 [ WT-9409 ]
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) made changes -
            Link This issue is blocked by WT-9409 [ WT-9409 ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 49.75h [ 179100 ] 50.25h [ 180900 ]
            Worklog Id 86529 [ 86529 ]
            prasanna Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 50.25h [ 180900 ] 50.75h [ 182700 ]
            Worklog Id 88188 [ 88188 ]
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: On Hold(10211)
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) made changes -
            Link This issue blocks NF-5533 [ NF-5533 ]
            parmeshwar.jumbad Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive) made changes -
            Link This issue blocks NF-5533 [ NF-5533 ]
            rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Meghana Joshi [ meghana.kulkarni ] Venkatesh Pujari [ venkatesh.pujari ]
            venkatesh.pujari Venkatesh Pujari (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Venkatesh Pujari [ venkatesh.pujari ] Sachin Hingole [ sachin.hingole ]
            Hide
            Permalink
            sachin.hingole Sachin Hingole (Inactive) added a comment -

            Can you please close these JIRA from WT & ST project.

            Show
            sachin.hingole Sachin Hingole (Inactive) added a comment - Can you please close these JIRA from WT & ST project.
            sachin.hingole Sachin Hingole (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Sachin Hingole [ sachin.hingole ] Prashant Samal [ prashant.samal ]
            Prashant.samal Prashant Samal (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Prashant Samal [ prashant.samal ]
            Resolution Cancelled [ 10300 ]
            Status In LB Testing [ 10200 ] Resolution Setting [ 11616 ]
            Prashant.samal Prashant Samal (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Resolution Setting [ 11616 ] Closed [ 6 ]
            Transition Time In Source Status Execution Times
            Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made transition -
            New Request Pending for Approval
            		170d 22h 15m 1
            Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made transition -
            Pending for Approval Approved for Development
            		3s 1
            Prasanna Karlekar (Inactive) made transition -
            Approved for Development In Development
            		1m 29s 1
            Sachin Hingole (Inactive) made transition -
            In Development In LB Testing
            		11d 19h 56m 1
            Prashant Samal (Inactive) made transition -
            In LB Testing Resolution Setting
            		289d 21h 26m 1
            Prashant Samal (Inactive) made transition -
            Resolution Setting Closed
            		4s 1

              People

              Assignee:
              Unassigned
              Reporter:
              aditya.vishwakarma Aditya Vishwakarma (Inactive)
              Developer:
              Parmeshwar Jumbad (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              5 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:
                Dev Due Date:
                Pre-Prod Due Date:
                Production Due Date:
                Code Review Date:

                  Time Tracking

                  Estimated:
                  Original Estimate - 30h Original Estimate - 30h
                  30h
                  Remaining:
                  Remaining Estimate - 0h
                  0h
                  Logged:
                  Time Spent - 50.75h
                  50.75h