Uploaded image for project: 'WORKTERRA'
  1. WORKTERRA
  2. WT-9195

ACA 2017 1095C User can add the choice of codes for Multi-Employer Eligibility Rule on ACA 1095C Class wise rate configuration screen

    Details

    • Type: Enhancement
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Medium
    • Resolution: Done
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: ACA
    • Labels:
      None
    • Module:
      ACA - 2017
    • Reported by:
      Harbinger
    • Item State:
      Production Complete - Closed
    • Issue Importance:
      Good To Have
    • Feature Category:
      Integration
    • Severity:
      Simple

      Description

      As we came across a scenario while furnishing the request of Austin company for conditional codes(1J/1K), An idea popped into my mind.
      The earlier implementation of Multi-Employer Eligibility Rule is only for 1H/2E Codes,
      the change in this implementation is that, user can add the choice of codes which he/she want to display on PDF.

      Actual implementation -
      After selecting Multi Employer Eligibility Rule on 1095-C Report user can enter Line 14 Code,Line 15 Cost & Line 16 code into the text boxes and those inputs will be considered for those bunch of employees falling under that rule.

        Attachments

        1. Test Scenarios.doc
          9 kB
        2. WT-9195 Documentation.doc
          17 kB
        3. WT-9195TestCases_stage.xls
          22 kB
        4. WT-9195TestCases.xls
          22 kB

          Issue Links

            Activity

            Hide
            kumar.chhajed Kumar Chhajed (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar,

            I have attached the document for functionality changes and their test cases for this enhancement. Please review this document and let me know in-case if I'm missing any points that need to considered.

            Refer - WT-9195 Documentation.doc

            Smita Pawar Please go through the document and attach your test cases and testing plan.

            Thanks,
            Kumar Chhajed

            Show
            kumar.chhajed Kumar Chhajed (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar , I have attached the document for functionality changes and their test cases for this enhancement. Please review this document and let me know in-case if I'm missing any points that need to considered. Refer - WT-9195 Documentation.doc Smita Pawar Please go through the document and attach your test cases and testing plan. Thanks, Kumar Chhajed
            Hide
            nandkumar Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Smita,

            Can you please go thought the development document and please let me know ant thing is required from our side.

            Please ensure that the Test Cases has been reviewed before starting the testing of this enhancement.

            Show
            nandkumar Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Smita, Can you please go thought the development document and please let me know ant thing is required from our side. Please ensure that the Test Cases has been reviewed before starting the testing of this enhancement.
            Hide
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi,
            PFA test scenarios for enhancement and let me know if I am missing anything.
            We are preparing test cases from test scenarios.

            FYI

            Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar, Sachin Hingole,Kumar Chhajed,Rakesh Roy,Revansiddha Gaur,Yogesh Chaudhari Test Scenarios.doc

            Show
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment - Hi, PFA test scenarios for enhancement and let me know if I am missing anything. We are preparing test cases from test scenarios. FYI Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar , Sachin Hingole , Kumar Chhajed , Rakesh Roy , Revansiddha Gaur , Yogesh Chaudhari Test Scenarios.doc
            Hide
            kumar.chhajed Kumar Chhajed (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Smita Pawar,

            Please include test cases for Eligibility Rule screen as we have removed the Multi-Employer Eligibility Column and it was included in Eligibility rule Summary screen.

            Thanks,
            Kumar Chhajed.

            CC Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar

            Show
            kumar.chhajed Kumar Chhajed (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Smita Pawar , Please include test cases for Eligibility Rule screen as we have removed the Multi-Employer Eligibility Column and it was included in Eligibility rule Summary screen. Thanks, Kumar Chhajed. CC Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar
            Hide
            rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) added a comment -

            Smita PawarPlease update stage and production due date.
            Sachin Hingole

            Show
            rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) added a comment - Smita Pawar Please update stage and production due date. Sachin Hingole
            Hide
            kumar.chhajed Kumar Chhajed (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Smita Pawar,

            This JRIA is deployed to LB (Old)

            Thanks,
            Kumar Chhajed

            Show
            kumar.chhajed Kumar Chhajed (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Smita Pawar , This JRIA is deployed to LB (Old) Thanks, Kumar Chhajed
            Hide
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment -

            We have verified above enhancement on LB. Its working fine.
            Testing on Azure is in progress

            Show
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment - We have verified above enhancement on LB. Its working fine. Testing on Azure is in progress
            Hide
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment -

            PFA test cases and testing status for enhancement.
            This enhancement is ready for stage.

            Show
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment - PFA test cases and testing status for enhancement. This enhancement is ready for stage.
            Hide
            rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) added a comment -

            verified above mentioned point , it is ready for production ,PFA WT-9195TestCases_stage.xls
            CC- Rakesh Roy Sachin Hingole Smita Pawar

            Show
            rutuja.chilwar Rutuja Chilwar (Inactive) added a comment - verified above mentioned point , it is ready for production ,PFA WT-9195TestCases_stage.xls CC- Rakesh Roy Sachin Hingole Smita Pawar
            Hide
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment -

            We have verified above mentioned issue on Production company [Caiso for Hspl].
            Tested only critical scenarios which are as follows.

            1.Checked whether 1H-2E code is reflecting on reort after correction.
            2.Checked whether Correction is getting priority when class wise Configuration is set to Yes.
            3.If line 16 code is 2C then it will not be replaced by any other code except,
            4.If line 14 = 1H and Line 16 = 2D then it does not replace With the configured codes.

            Show
            smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive) added a comment - We have verified above mentioned issue on Production company [Caiso for Hspl] . Tested only critical scenarios which are as follows. 1.Checked whether 1H-2E code is reflecting on reort after correction. 2.Checked whether Correction is getting priority when class wise Configuration is set to Yes. 3.If line 16 code is 2C then it will not be replaced by any other code except, 4.If line 14 = 1H and Line 16 = 2D then it does not replace With the configured codes.

              People

              Assignee:
              smita.pawar Smita Pawar (Inactive)
              Reporter:
              kumar.chhajed Kumar Chhajed (Inactive)
              Developer:
              Kumar Chhajed (Inactive)
              QA:
              Smita Pawar (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              5 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:
                Pre-Prod Due Date:
                Production Due Date:
                Code Review Date:

                  Time Tracking

                  Estimated:
                  Original Estimate - 40h Original Estimate - 40h
                  40h
                  Remaining:
                  Remaining Estimate - 0h
                  0h
                  Logged:
                  Time Spent - 121.5h
                  121.5h