WORKTERRAProject Type: software

WORKTERRA

Uploaded image for project: 'WORKTERRA'
  1. WORKTERRA
  2. WT-9330

Waived Import - Contigency is not working

    Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Production Complete
    • Priority: Medium
    • Resolution: Done
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: None
    • Labels:
      None
    • Environment:
      QA
    • Bug Type:
      Functional
    • Bug Severity:
      Medium
    • Module:
      BenAdmin - Import
    • Reported by:
      Harbinger
    • Item State:
      Production Complete - Closed
    • Issue Importance:
      Must Have
    • Sprint:
      WT Sprint 34-Bugs

      Description

      Precondition
      1) Dental Plan is Contigenct [ Eligible / Forced ] on Medical Plan
      2) Employee having enrollment in Medical and Dental Plan
      3) Create one benefit level import template

      Replication Steps :
      1) Navigate to Manual Import Export Page
      2) Import Data

      Issue : Medical Plan is waived but Dental plan is not waived

      CC - Sachin Hingole

        Attachments

        1. caisoDBAfterWaive.png
          caisoDBAfterWaive.png
          125 kB
        2. caisoDBBeforeWaive.png
          caisoDBBeforeWaive.png
          125 kB
        3. caisoImportSuccess.png
          caisoImportSuccess.png
          191 kB
        4. ContingencyMatt.jpg
          ContingencyMatt.jpg
          206 kB
        5. ContingenyWaive.jpg
          ContingenyWaive.jpg
          280 kB
        6. durhamDBAfterWaive.png
          durhamDBAfterWaive.png
          128 kB
        7. durhamDBBeforeWaive.png
          durhamDBBeforeWaive.png
          126 kB
        8. durhamImportSuccess.png
          durhamImportSuccess.png
          191 kB
        9. Enrollnow.jpg
          Enrollnow.jpg
          184 kB
        10. FDUContingency.jpg
          FDUContingency.jpg
          205 kB
        11. ImportFailContingency.txt
          0.5 kB
        12. MEdicalPlan.jpg
          MEdicalPlan.jpg
          171 kB
        13. viewHistoryEnrollment.jpg
          viewHistoryEnrollment.jpg
          255 kB
        14. Waivedcontingency.jpg
          Waivedcontingency.jpg
          184 kB

          Issue Links

          relates to

          Enhancement - An improvement or enhancement to an existing feature or task. WT-8262 Importing Waived Benefit Type data

          • Low - Minor problem or easily worked around.
          • Production Complete

            Activity

            Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
            meghana.joshi Meghana Joshi (Inactive) created issue -
            meghana.joshi Meghana Joshi (Inactive) made changes -
            Field Original Value New Value
            Link This issue relates to WT-8262 [ WT-8262 ]
            meghana.joshi Meghana Joshi (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Vijay Siddha [ vijays ] Suraj Sokasane [ suraj.sokasane ]
            rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
            Module Parent values: BenAdmin(10100) Parent values: BenAdmin(10100)Level 1 values: Import(10111)
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Open [ 1 ] In Development [ 10007 ]
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: On Hold(10207)
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) made changes -
            Sprint WT Sprint 33-Bugs [ 77 ]
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Suraj Sokasane [ suraj.sokasane ] snehal katkar [ snehal.katkar ]
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Dev Due Date 26/Jul/2017
            Developer snehal katkar [ snehal.katkar ]
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: On Hold(10207) Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Analysis(10204)
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) made changes -
            Dev Due Date 26/Jul/2017 28/Jul/2017
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) made changes -
            Sprint WT Sprint 33-Bugs [ 77 ] WT Sprint 34-Bugs [ 79 ]
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) made changes -
            Dev Due Date 28/Jul/2017 11/Aug/2017
            snehal.katkar Snehal Katkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee snehal katkar [ snehal.katkar ] Jayshree Nagpure [ jayshree.nagpure ]
            snehal.katkar Snehal Katkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Analysis(10204) Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Local Testing(10209)
            Hide
            Permalink
            snehal.katkar Snehal Katkar (Inactive) added a comment -

            This issue got resolved with enhancement of WT-9291.

            Show
            snehal.katkar Snehal Katkar (Inactive) added a comment - This issue got resolved with enhancement of WT-9291 .
            Permalink
            snehal.katkar Snehal Katkar (Inactive) logged work - 11/Aug/17 08:53 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1h
               

              unit testing

            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Status In Development [ 10007 ] Local Testing [ 10200 ]
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Local Testing(10209) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210)
            Hide
            Permalink
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment -

            Verified this issue on LB
            Company - QA FDU, QA Wheaton company

            Verified waived enrollment.
            Observed that waived enrollment are not properly updated on Enroll now screen.
            And even termination date is not updating on view history page.
            Also contingency scenario is not working.

            Thanks,
            Jayshree

            cc : Rakesh Roy Prasad Pise

            Show
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment - Verified this issue on LB Company - QA FDU, QA Wheaton company Verified waived enrollment. Observed that waived enrollment are not properly updated on Enroll now screen. And even termination date is not updating on view history page. Also contingency scenario is not working. Thanks, Jayshree cc : Rakesh Roy Prasad Pise
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Re-open(10212)
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Jayshree Nagpure [ jayshree.nagpure ] snehal katkar [ snehal.katkar ]
            snehal.katkar Snehal Katkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 0h [ 0 ]
            Time Spent 1h [ 3600 ]
            Worklog Id 72005 [ 72005 ]
            Permalink
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) logged work - 21/Aug/17 02:17 PM
            • Time Spent:
              2h
               
              <No comment>
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 1h [ 3600 ] 3h [ 10800 ]
            Worklog Id 73130 [ 73130 ]
            snehal.katkar Snehal Katkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee snehal katkar [ snehal.katkar ] Jayshree Nagpure [ jayshree.nagpure ]
            Hide
            Permalink
            snehal.katkar Snehal Katkar (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Jayshree Nagpure,

            Please refer to WT-10678. Contingency for waive import is handled in code fix for mentioned ticket. Also, I have provided the details there.

            Thanks,
            Snehal

            Show
            snehal.katkar Snehal Katkar (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Jayshree Nagpure , Please refer to WT-10678 . Contingency for waive import is handled in code fix for mentioned ticket. Also, I have provided the details there. Thanks, Snehal
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment Enrollnow.jpg [ 59756 ]
            Attachment MEdicalPlan.jpg [ 59757 ]
            Attachment viewHistoryEnrollment.jpg [ 59758 ]
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment ContingencyMatt.jpg [ 59759 ]
            Attachment FDUContingency.jpg [ 59760 ]
            Attachment ImportFailContingency.txt [ 59761 ]
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment Waivedcontingency.jpg [ 59762 ]
            Hide
            Permalink
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Snehal Katkar,

            Verified this issue on LB
            Company - QA Matt for hspl, QA wheaton

            Verified below contingency scenario :
            1)Medical Plan A - enroll this plan (With this plan, Plan B is also enrolled)
            2)Medical plan B- applied contingency scenario in this plan in eligibility rule
            3)For waive import also its expected that when Plan A is waived, Plan B must be waived
            4)But we are getting import fail issue when contingency is applied to any plan.

            Please note : Error Log for all the attached companies are same

            Please find attached error log and screen shot : ImportFailContingency.txt

            Not working as expected
            Hence re-opening this jira

            Thanks,
            Jayshree

            cc : Rakesh Roy Prasad Pise

            Show
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Snehal Katkar , Verified this issue on LB Company - QA Matt for hspl, QA wheaton Verified below contingency scenario : 1)Medical Plan A - enroll this plan (With this plan, Plan B is also enrolled) 2)Medical plan B- applied contingency scenario in this plan in eligibility rule 3)For waive import also its expected that when Plan A is waived, Plan B must be waived 4)But we are getting import fail issue when contingency is applied to any plan. Please note : Error Log for all the attached companies are same Please find attached error log and screen shot : ImportFailContingency.txt Not working as expected Hence re-opening this jira Thanks, Jayshree cc : Rakesh Roy Prasad Pise
            Permalink
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) logged work - 24/Aug/17 01:48 PM
            • Time Spent:
              2.5h
               

              Testing on LB

            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 3h [ 10800 ] 5.5h [ 19800 ]
            Worklog Id 74145 [ 74145 ]
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Jayshree Nagpure [ jayshree.nagpure ] snehal katkar [ snehal.katkar ]
            Permalink
            snehal.katkar Snehal Katkar (Inactive) logged work - 25/Aug/17 06:10 AM
            • Time Spent:
              2h
               

              Testing, Discussion with Jayshree

            snehal.katkar Snehal Katkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment caisoDBAfterWaive.png [ 59887 ]
            Attachment caisoDBBeforeWaive.png [ 59888 ]
            Attachment caisoImportSuccess.png [ 59889 ]
            snehal.katkar Snehal Katkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment durhamDBAfterWaive.png [ 59890 ]
            Attachment durhamDBBeforeWaive.png [ 59891 ]
            Attachment durhamImportSuccess.png [ 59892 ]
            Hide
            Permalink
            snehal.katkar Snehal Katkar (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Jayshree,

            Waive import is working as expected for contingency. I checked contingency scenarios for 'City of Durham for HSPL' and 'For QA Caiso for HSPL' companies.
            Please refer to below screenshots.

            Plan design ids 26,6 and 24 are considered in contingency scenario, for company 'For QA Caiso for HSPL'.

            Plan design ids 60,61 and 66 are considered in contingency scenario, for company 'City of Durham for HSPL'.

            UI screenshots I have attached in ticket WT-9327.

            Again, which you have observed, must be company specific or data issue.

            Thanks,
            Snehal

            cc: Jaideep Vinchurkar Rakesh Roy

            Show
            snehal.katkar Snehal Katkar (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Jayshree, Waive import is working as expected for contingency. I checked contingency scenarios for 'City of Durham for HSPL' and 'For QA Caiso for HSPL' companies. Please refer to below screenshots. Plan design ids 26,6 and 24 are considered in contingency scenario, for company 'For QA Caiso for HSPL'. Plan design ids 60,61 and 66 are considered in contingency scenario, for company 'City of Durham for HSPL'. UI screenshots I have attached in ticket WT-9327 . Again, which you have observed, must be company specific or data issue. Thanks, Snehal cc: Jaideep Vinchurkar Rakesh Roy
            snehal.katkar Snehal Katkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee snehal katkar [ snehal.katkar ] Jayshree Nagpure [ jayshree.nagpure ]
            snehal.katkar Snehal Katkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 5.5h [ 19800 ] 7.5h [ 27000 ]
            Worklog Id 74622 [ 74622 ]
            Permalink
            snehal.katkar Snehal Katkar (Inactive) logged work - 29/Aug/17 06:15 AM
            • Time Spent:
              2h
               

              Discussion with Jaideep and Jayshree, testing, jira update

            snehal.katkar Snehal Katkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 7.5h [ 27000 ] 9.5h [ 34200 ]
            Worklog Id 74627 [ 74627 ]
            Permalink
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) logged work - 29/Aug/17 03:50 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1h
               

              Discussion and Verification

            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 9.5h [ 34200 ] 10.5h [ 37800 ]
            Worklog Id 74959 [ 74959 ]
            Permalink
            snehal.katkar Snehal Katkar (Inactive) logged work - 30/Aug/17 01:00 AM
            • Time Spent:
              2h
               

              testing

            rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
            Bug Severity Medium [ 16702 ]
            Permalink
            snehal.katkar Snehal Katkar (Inactive) logged work - 31/Aug/17 01:00 AM
            • Time Spent:
              1h
               

              testing

            snehal.katkar Snehal Katkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 10.5h [ 37800 ] 11.5h [ 41400 ]
            Worklog Id 76453 [ 76453 ]
            snehal.katkar Snehal Katkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 11.5h [ 41400 ] 13.5h [ 48600 ]
            Worklog Id 76454 [ 76454 ]
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment ContingenyWaive.jpg [ 60574 ]
            Hide
            Permalink
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment -

            Verified for contingency scenario.
            Company - QA city of durham for hspl

            Contingency scenario is working fine.
            But label is not updating, as discussed with Jyoti Mayne issue exists for UI also.

            But from import end, its properly updating on view history.
            Hence marking item state as LB QA on hold

            Show
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment - Verified for contingency scenario. Company - QA city of durham for hspl Contingency scenario is working fine. But label is not updating, as discussed with Jyoti Mayne issue exists for UI also. But from import end, its properly updating on view history. Hence marking item state as LB QA on hold
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Re-open(10212) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: On Hold(10211)
            Permalink
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) logged work - 04/Sep/17 01:10 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1.5h
               

              Re-testing on LB

            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 13.5h [ 48600 ] 15h [ 54000 ]
            Worklog Id 76707 [ 76707 ]
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: On Hold(10211) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213)
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Dev Due Date 11/Aug/2017 11/Aug/2017
            Production Due Date 14/Sep/2017
            Stage Due Date 11/Sep/17 [ 2017-09-11 ]
            Original Estimate 0h [ 0 ]
            snehal.katkar Snehal Katkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602)
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: In Testing(10214)
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Local Testing [ 10200 ] Stage Testing [ 10201 ]
            Hide
            Permalink
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment -

            verified on stage
            Company -city of bellevue for hspl

            Verified for contingency scenario.
            Working fine

            Marking item state as Ready for Production

            Show
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment - verified on stage Company -city of bellevue for hspl Verified for contingency scenario. Working fine Marking item state as Ready for Production
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: In Testing(10214) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Ready for Production(10217)
            khandu.kshirsagar Khandu Kshirsagar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Ready for Production(10217) Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: Production Deployed(10221)
            snehal.katkar Snehal Katkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Code Review Date 22/Aug/2017
            Code Reviewed By Jaideep Vinchurkar [ 11908 ]
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: Production Deployed(10221) Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: In Testing(10218)
            Hide
            Permalink
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment -

            Verified on Production
            Working fine

            Marking item state as Production complete

            Show
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment - Verified on Production Working fine Marking item state as Production complete
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: In Testing(10218) Parent values: Production Complete(10222)Level 1 values: Closed(10223)
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Stage Testing [ 10201 ] Production Testing [ 10202 ]
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Resolution Fixed [ 1 ]
            Status Production Testing [ 10202 ] Production Complete [ 10028 ]
            satyap Satya made changes -
            Environment_New LB [ 18444 ]
            Transition Time In Source Status Execution Times
            Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made transition -
            Open In Development
            		42d 4h 12m 1
            Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made transition -
            In Development In LB Testing
            		70d 17h 50m 1
            Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made transition -
            In LB Testing Stage Testing
            		27d 4h 42m 1
            Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made transition -
            Stage Testing In Production Testing
            		1d 48m 1
            Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made transition -
            In Production Testing Production Complete
            		8s 1

              People

              Assignee:
              jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
              Reporter:
              meghana.joshi Meghana Joshi (Inactive)
              Developer:
              Snehal Katkar (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              3 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:
                Dev Due Date:
                Pre-Prod Due Date:
                Production Due Date:
                Code Review Date:

                  Time Tracking

                  Estimated:
                  Original Estimate - 0h
                  0h
                  Remaining:
                  Remaining Estimate - 0h
                  0h
                  Logged:
                  Time Spent - 15h
                  15h