Details

    • Type: Analysis
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: High
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: None
    • Labels:
      None
    • Module:
      BenAdmin - EDS
    • Reported by:
      Client
    • Company:
      LONG Building Technologies
    • Severity:
      Simple

      Description

      Hi Dev -

      I need some assistance with a set up - Here are the rules:

      1. New Hires - Benefits are effective 1st of the month following 1 month from DOH.

      2. Rehires 1 - This set of rehires are based on the term date - If they are rehired within 13 weeks from their term date, they will get benefits effective date of rehire.

      3. Rehire 2 - This set of rehires are based on the term date - If they are rehired outside of 13 weeks from their term date, they will get benefits effective 1st of the month following 1 month from Rehire date.

      I have created a New Hire window for just Active employees. I am expecting this to only apply to new hires and not consider rehires.

      For the Rehires 1 and 2, I have created rules that are driven off of the "Other" status within the "Change Status" section. These rules are only for Rehire status. Please see screenshot:

      This works to some extent - It opens the window correctly BUT the auto enrolled benefits are not showing with the correct date for Rehire 2. I am thinking that the plans are triggered BEFORE the additional eligibility is ran. Can you confirm my thought? I am not sure how else to drive these 2 different rehire rules.

      Thanks!
      Jenni

      Amit Thorve

        Attachments

        1. image-2017-05-10-15-18-48-656.png
          22 kB
          Jennifer Johnson
        2. rehired.JPG
          63 kB
          Sumeet.Kolge
        3. rul 1 over 13.png
          65 kB
          Sumeet.Kolge
        4. effective date.png
          14 kB
          Sumeet.Kolge

          Issue Links

            Activity

            jjsassy99 Jennifer Johnson (Inactive) created issue -
            rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
            Field Original Value New Value
            Module Parent values: BenAdmin(10100) Parent values: BenAdmin(10100)Level 1 values: EDS(10108)
            sheetal.bodhale Sheetal Bodhale (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Vijay Siddha [ vijays ] Mandar Kulkarni [ mandark ]
            Hide
            sheetal.bodhale Sheetal Bodhale (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Mandar Kulkarni,

            Please check this.

            CC:SatyaJaideep Vinchurkar
            Thanks,
            Sheetal Bodhale

            Show
            sheetal.bodhale Sheetal Bodhale (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Mandar Kulkarni , Please check this. CC: Satya Jaideep Vinchurkar Thanks, Sheetal Bodhale
            sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made changes -
            Status New [ 10508 ] In Analysis [ 10008 ]
            sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made changes -
            Status In Analysis [ 10008 ] In Review [ 10203 ]
            sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment rehired.JPG [ 47715 ]
            sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment rul 1 over 13.png [ 47716 ]
            sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment effective date.png [ 47717 ]
            Hide
            sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hello Jennifer Johnson

            We tested the below scenarios for under week 13 rule and over week 13 rule set in company information and following are our observations.

            1. We changes EEs Active status to Terminattion date with effective date of 1st may 2017

            2. Then again we navigated to change status menu>> and we changed the status of EE to 'rehire' and added reason for it(other than under13 i.e. rehired again) and entered effective date 15th august 2017 .
            To note: Here date of re-hire is 15th Aug 2017

            3. Now as per the rules set for re-hire "First of the month following XX month from the date of hire" the EE is getting the correct date for re-hire enrollment mode i.e 1st Oct 2017 ( as date of re- hire was 15th Aug 2017)

            4.For auto enrollment plans the effective dates are also showing correctly,i.e. for "Basic Employee Life" effective date is set as *10/1/2017 *refer figure above

            Seems like the system is behaving as expected.

            Could you please check and verify at your end, and if still problem persist please get back to us with a copy of an attachment,it would be helpful for us for our further analysis.

            Do let us know if you have any queries. Thank you!
            ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
            CC: Mandar Kulkarni, Vijay Siddha, Sheetal Bodhale, Jaideep Vinchurkar, Prasad Patil

            Show
            sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) added a comment - Hello Jennifer Johnson We tested the below scenarios for under week 13 rule and over week 13 rule set in company information and following are our observations. 1. We changes EEs Active status to Terminattion date with effective date of 1st may 2017 2. Then again we navigated to change status menu>> and we changed the status of EE to 'rehire' and added reason for it(other than under13 i.e. rehired again ) and entered effective date 15th august 2017 . To note : Here date of re-hire is 15th Aug 2017 3. Now as per the rules set for re-hire " First of the month following XX month from the date of hire " the EE is getting the correct date for re-hire enrollment mode i.e 1st Oct 2017 ( as date of re- hire was 15th Aug 2017 ) 4.For auto enrollment plans the effective dates are also showing correctly,i.e. for "Basic Employee Life" effective date is set as *10/1/2017 *refer figure above Seems like the system is behaving as expected. Could you please check and verify at your end, and if still problem persist please get back to us with a copy of an attachment,it would be helpful for us for our further analysis. Do let us know if you have any queries. Thank you! --------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC: Mandar Kulkarni , Vijay Siddha , Sheetal Bodhale , Jaideep Vinchurkar , Prasad Patil
            sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Mandar Kulkarni [ mandark ] Jennifer Fernandes [ jjsassy99 ]
            sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) logged work - 11/May/17 09:23 AM
            • Time Spent:
              3h
               

              Analysis, tried scenarios discussion with sheetal and provided solution.

            sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 0h [ 0 ]
            Time Spent 3h [ 10800 ]
            Worklog Id 44719 [ 44719 ]
            prasad.patil Prasad Patil (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 3h [ 10800 ] 5.5h [ 19800 ]
            Worklog Id 44728 [ 44728 ]
            prasad.patil Prasad Patil (Inactive) logged work - 11/May/17 05:00 PM
            • Time Spent:
              2.5h
               

              Analysis and discussion with team.

            Hide
            jjsassy99 Jennifer Johnson (Inactive) added a comment -

            Thank you all - I had updated the plan rules so this may be why you were able to see it correctly. Client is testing at this time.

            Jenni

            Show
            jjsassy99 Jennifer Johnson (Inactive) added a comment - Thank you all - I had updated the plan rules so this may be why you were able to see it correctly. Client is testing at this time. Jenni
            jjsassy99 Jennifer Johnson (Inactive) made changes -
            Resolution Unresolved [ 10200 ]
            Status In Review [ 10203 ] Closed [ 6 ]
            sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made changes -
            Link This issue is duplicated by WT-9743 [ WT-9743 ]
            rajendraj Rajendra Joshi (Inactive) logged work - 27/Jun/17 11:14 AM
            • Time Spent:
              2.5h
               

              EBS Onboard List - discussion - rehires and current case (mail)
              1. Discussion with Nidhi, Swapnil
              2. Analysis and testing on stage company long

            rajendraj Rajendra Joshi (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 5.5h [ 19800 ] 8h [ 28800 ]
            Worklog Id 58235 [ 58235 ]
            Transition Time In Source Status Execution Times
            Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made transition -
            NEW In Analysis
            10h 47m 1
            Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made transition -
            In Analysis In Review
            35s 1
            Jennifer Johnson (Inactive) made transition -
            In Review Closed
            1d 6h 44m 1

              People

              Assignee:
              jjsassy99 Jennifer Johnson (Inactive)
              Reporter:
              jjsassy99 Jennifer Johnson (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              3 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:

                  Time Tracking

                  Estimated:
                  Original Estimate - Not Specified
                  Not Specified
                  Remaining:
                  Remaining Estimate - 0h
                  0h
                  Logged:
                  Time Spent - 8h
                  8h