Uploaded image for project: 'WORKTERRA'
  1. WORKTERRA
  2. WT-9671

Quincy Coverage Amount is not Rounding

    Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Critical
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: BenAdmin
    • Labels:
      None
    • Environment:
      Stage
    • Bug Type:
      Functional
    • Bug Severity:
      Medium
    • Level:
      Employee
    • Module:
      BenAdmin - Enrollment
    • Reported by:
      Client
    • Item State:
      Production Complete - Closed
    • Sprint:
      WT Sprint 30 -Bugs

      Description

      Please refer to WT-9027 for background

      Please see email from BCC below. I have also uploaded the screenshot. This issue is holding up their UAT for go live. Please look at this on priority.

      Product: Universal Life Insurance
      Rounding Rule: Set to Round up to next $1,000
      This is the group that development had to allow for a .5 multiple of earnings to be allowed. We have the rule set at 1.5 X Earnings. It seems that the rounding works in the system for other scenarios we have built but NOT for the 1.5. Is it possible that when development allowed for the .5 multiple that they didn’t take that into consideration in their rounding logic.

      Attached is an example of a person whose benefit should show as $146,000 based on how we have the plan built and the rounding rule, however, it is displaying as $145,750. .

        Attachments

        1. Checklist_for_WT_9671.doc
          26 kB
        2. contigent rule.JPG
          contigent rule.JPG
          94 kB
        3. ee enroll now.JPG
          ee enroll now.JPG
          118 kB
        4. EE enroll now.JPG
          EE enroll now.JPG
          71 kB
        5. ee payroll.JPG
          ee payroll.JPG
          85 kB
        6. grandfather plan.JPG
          grandfather plan.JPG
          86 kB
        7. Offered amount - Salary multiple.jpg
          Offered amount - Salary multiple.jpg
          143 kB
        8. plan settings.JPG
          plan settings.JPG
          145 kB
        9. Range percentage of monthly salary.jpg
          Range percentage of monthly salary.jpg
          156 kB
        10. Range percentage of monthly salary issue..jpg
          Range percentage of monthly salary issue..jpg
          122 kB
        11. salary.JPG
          salary.JPG
          106 kB
        12. Screen Shot 05-31-17 at 02.56 PM.PNG
          Screen Shot 05-31-17 at 02.56 PM.PNG
          189 kB
        13. screenshot-1.png
          screenshot-1.png
          100 kB
        14. WT_9671_Affected_Files.txt
          0.1 kB

          Activity

          dkulling Debbie Kulling created issue -
          rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
          Field Original Value New Value
          Module Parent values: BenAdmin(10100) Parent values: BenAdmin(10100)Level 1 values: Enrollment(10107)
          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made changes -
          Assignee Vijay Siddha [ vijays ] Sumeet.Kolge [ sumeet.kolge ]
          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made changes -
          Attachment EE enroll now.JPG [ 50205 ]
          Attachment plan settings.JPG [ 50206 ]
          Attachment salary.JPG [ 50207 ]
          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made changes -
          Attachment plan settings.JPG [ 50206 ]
          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made changes -
          Attachment EE enroll now.JPG [ 50205 ]
          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made changes -
          Attachment salary.JPG [ 50207 ]
          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made changes -
          Attachment EE enroll now.JPG [ 50210 ]
          Attachment plan settings.JPG [ 50211 ]
          Attachment salary.JPG [ 50212 ]
          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made changes -
          Attachment plan settings.JPG [ 50211 ]
          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made changes -
          Attachment plan settings.JPG [ 50220 ]
          Hide
          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) added a comment -

          Hello Umesh Kadam

          We cross-checked this issue and below are our findings:

          We tested the scenarios for EE Michael Funk
          As per the settings in the Universal Insurance Plan;
          “Coverage amount determined” by is selected as “salary multiple” and “multiple value” is “1.5” refer below screen shot.

          Now as per the salary of EE Michael Funk, refer below screen shot

          To note: benefit salary will be considered as the settings in plan>> cost and coverage>> consider benefit salary flag is selected as “Yes”

          Benefit salary = 1, 30,500
          Therefore as per setting in the plan under cost and coverage
          Multiple value = 1.5, therefore as per the rules,
          1.5 Ă— 1, 30,500 = 1, 95,750
          As per the rounding rules the coverage should show 1, 96,000
          However on enroll now screen the coverage amount is showing something different 1, 45,750, refer below screen shot

          To note: even if we ignore coverage amount, the rounding rule is selected as “round up to nearest” by “1000” these rule does not apply we also cross-checked by changing multiple values like 2,3,4,5 etc

          If we change multiple value even then the coverage does not change on EE enroll now screen.

          We have checked all the plan level setting and found nothing, we also cross-checked this issue for some random EEs.

          Request you to please look into this issue.Thank you !
          -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          CC: Mandar Kulkarni, Vijay Siddha, Satya, Jaideep Vinchurkar

          Show
          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) added a comment - Hello Umesh Kadam We cross-checked this issue and below are our findings: We tested the scenarios for EE Michael Funk As per the settings in the Universal Insurance Plan; “Coverage amount determined” by is selected as “salary multiple” and “multiple value” is “1.5” refer below screen shot. Now as per the salary of EE Michael Funk, refer below screen shot To note: benefit salary will be considered as the settings in plan>> cost and coverage>> consider benefit salary flag is selected as “Yes” Benefit salary = 1, 30,500 Therefore as per setting in the plan under cost and coverage Multiple value = 1.5 , therefore as per the rules, 1.5 × 1, 30,500 = 1, 95,750 As per the rounding rules the coverage should show 1, 96,000 However on enroll now screen the coverage amount is showing something different 1, 45,750, refer below screen shot To note: even if we ignore coverage amount, the rounding rule is selected as “round up to nearest” by “1000” these rule does not apply we also cross-checked by changing multiple values like 2,3,4,5 etc If we change multiple value even then the coverage does not change on EE enroll now screen. We have checked all the plan level setting and found nothing, we also cross-checked this issue for some random EEs. Request you to please look into this issue.Thank you ! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC: Mandar Kulkarni , Vijay Siddha , Satya , Jaideep Vinchurkar
          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made changes -
          Assignee Sumeet.Kolge [ sumeet.kolge ] Umesh Kadam [ umesh.kadam ]
          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) logged work - 01/Jun/17 11:42 AM
          • Time Spent:
            3.3h
             

            Analysis tried different scenarios for EE, discussion with jaideep.

          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made changes -
          Remaining Estimate 0h [ 0 ]
          Time Spent 3.3h [ 11880 ]
          Worklog Id 51654 [ 51654 ]
          Hide
          dkulling Debbie Kulling added a comment -

          This is an urgent issue as this client is set to have their UAT signed by tomorrow. Please advise as soon as possible.
          Thank you

          Show
          dkulling Debbie Kulling added a comment - This is an urgent issue as this client is set to have their UAT signed by tomorrow. Please advise as soon as possible. Thank you
          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) logged work - 02/Jun/17 05:12 AM
          • Time Spent:
            2h
             

            Analysis and cross-checked scenarios for random EEs.

          umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
          Status Open [ 1 ] In Development [ 10007 ]
          umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
          Assignee Umesh Kadam [ umesh.kadam ] Shailendra Honrao [ shailendra.honrao ]
          Developer Shailendra Honrao [ shailendra.honrao ]
          Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Analysis(10204)
          Original Estimate 0h [ 0 ]
          Hide
          dkulling Debbie Kulling added a comment -

          Can I please get an update on this

          Show
          dkulling Debbie Kulling added a comment - Can I please get an update on this
          Hide
          shailendra.honrao Shailendra Honrao (Inactive) added a comment -

          Hi Debbie Kulling,

          Please find 3Cs below :

          Concern Quincy Coverage Amount is not Rounding
          Cause As per current implementation, if Limit Available Coverage By Elected Amount In Contingent Plan flag on 'Eligibility Rules' of a plan is set to be 'Yes' then rounding of a coverage will not be done.
          Correction We have fixed code to round up coverage amount even if Limit Available Coverage By Elected Amount In Contingent Plan flag on 'Eligibility Rules' of a plan is set to be 'Yes'

          NOTE : In Quincy, this flag is set only on 'Universal Life Insurance'. For a quick fix we have done code change for "Salary Multiple" only. We will do code fix as well as impact testing for other coverage amount types (like- Range Flat Amount and etc) on Monday.

          Thanks and Regards,
          Shailendra Honrao

          CC : Satya, Jaideep Vinchurkar, Mandar Kulkarni, Jyoti Mayne, Umesh Kadam, Sumeet.Kolge

          Show
          shailendra.honrao Shailendra Honrao (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Debbie Kulling , Please find 3Cs below : Concern Quincy Coverage Amount is not Rounding Cause As per current implementation, if Limit Available Coverage By Elected Amount In Contingent Plan flag on 'Eligibility Rules' of a plan is set to be 'Yes' then rounding of a coverage will not be done. Correction We have fixed code to round up coverage amount even if Limit Available Coverage By Elected Amount In Contingent Plan flag on 'Eligibility Rules' of a plan is set to be 'Yes' NOTE : In Quincy, this flag is set only on 'Universal Life Insurance'. For a quick fix we have done code change for "Salary Multiple" only. We will do code fix as well as impact testing for other coverage amount types (like- Range Flat Amount and etc) on Monday. Thanks and Regards, Shailendra Honrao CC : Satya , Jaideep Vinchurkar , Mandar Kulkarni , Jyoti Mayne , Umesh Kadam , Sumeet.Kolge
          shailendra.honrao Shailendra Honrao (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Analysis(10204) Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Progress(10206)
          shailendra.honrao Shailendra Honrao (Inactive) made changes -
          Code Reviewed By Amruta Lohiya [ 11906 ]
          Dev Due Date 05/Jun/2017
          shailendra.honrao Shailendra Honrao (Inactive) made changes -
          Attachment WT_9671_Affected_Files.txt [ 50441 ]
          shailendra.honrao Shailendra Honrao (Inactive) made changes -
          Attachment Checklist_for_WT_9671.doc [ 50442 ]
          shailendra.honrao Shailendra Honrao (Inactive) logged work - 02/Jun/17 03:10 PM - edited
          • Time Spent:
            6h
             

            Analysis,discussion, coding,unit testing, code check in

          shailendra.honrao Shailendra Honrao (Inactive) made changes -
          Time Spent 3.3h [ 11880 ] 9.3h [ 33480 ]
          Worklog Id 52048 [ 52048 ]
          shailendra.honrao Shailendra Honrao (Inactive) made changes -
          Worklog Id 52048 [ 52048 ]
          dkulling Debbie Kulling made changes -
          Attachment screenshot-1.png [ 50445 ]
          Hide
          dkulling Debbie Kulling added a comment -

          I sent an email as well. Please confirm that someone is working on this.

          I think the fixed caused another issue. Please see below. Now the employee shows zero coverage

          Show
          dkulling Debbie Kulling added a comment - I sent an email as well. Please confirm that someone is working on this. I think the fixed caused another issue. Please see below. Now the employee shows zero coverage
          Hide
          umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) added a comment -

          Hi Debbie Kulling,

          As per current customization 'Consider Benefit Salary' flag on Cost and Coverage of a plan has been set to 'Yes' and Benefit Salary in Employee Payroll for 'MICHAEL W FUNK' is not provided. Hence it is showing zero coverage on Enroll Now Page. Please find attached screenshots for the same

          We have checked in HSPL copy that, after providing Benefit Salary, system is showing proper coverage.

          Thanks and Regards
          :: Umesh Kadam

          CC : Vijay Siddha, Satya, Rakesh Roy, Jyoti Mayne, Shailendra Honrao,

          Show
          umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Debbie Kulling , As per current customization 'Consider Benefit Salary' flag on Cost and Coverage of a plan has been set to 'Yes' and Benefit Salary in Employee Payroll for 'MICHAEL W FUNK' is not provided. Hence it is showing zero coverage on Enroll Now Page. Please find attached screenshots for the same We have checked in HSPL copy that, after providing Benefit Salary, system is showing proper coverage. Thanks and Regards :: Umesh Kadam CC : Vijay Siddha , Satya , Rakesh Roy , Jyoti Mayne , Shailendra Honrao ,
          umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) logged work - 02/Jun/17 04:30 PM
          • Time Spent:
            4h
             

            Scenario reproduced in local
            code fix and unit testing with Shailendra
            Call with Debbie and Satya
            Query resolution for Debbie's comment
            Discussion with Satya, Amruta, Prasad and Shailendra
            Stage patch deployment follow up and smoke test in Stage

          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made changes -
          Attachment contigent rule.JPG [ 50455 ]
          Attachment ee enroll now.JPG [ 50456 ]
          Attachment ee payroll.JPG [ 50457 ]
          Attachment grandfather plan.JPG [ 50458 ]
          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made changes -
          Status In Development [ 10007 ] Local Testing [ 10200 ]
          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made changes -
          Status Local Testing [ 10200 ] Stage Testing [ 10201 ]
          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made changes -
          Status Stage Testing [ 10201 ] Production Testing [ 10202 ]
          Hide
          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) added a comment -

          Hello Debbie Kulling

          We have cross-checked this issue its working as expected also we tested this scenarios for some random EEs,
          1. In plan “Universal Insurance Plan” consider benefit salary flag is selected as “Yes”. Therefore it will consider benefit salary of EE.
          2. In Plan design>> Eligibility rule>> contingency settings, here as per the rule this “Universal Insurance Plan” is eligible to EE only if he is enrolled in “grandfather executive life insurance”.
          We can also see the flag “limit available coverage by elected amount in contingent plan” is set as “Yes”, refer below screen shot.

          Which means if you look at the grandfather plan, refer screen shot, coverage elected is 50,000.

          Now as per the EE Michael Funk benefit salary, refer figure below

          EE Michael Funk benefit salary is 1,30,500, and in grandfather plan his coverage is elected as 50,000.

          Therefore as per the calculation,
          1.5 (as per settings for salary multiple in plan design) ** 1,30,500 = 1,95,750*

          Now from 1, 95,750 we will minus 50,000 coverage of grand father (as per the contigency setting refer figure above in this comment) therefore the amount is 1, 45,750

          As per rounding rules in plan design>> cost and coverage we can see the round up value by 1000 i.e. 1, 46,000 on confirmation statement of an EE. refer figure below.

          The system is working fine as expected, please check and verify at your end. Thank you!
          ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          CC: Mandar Kulkarni, Vijay Siddha, Satya, Prasad Patil

          Show
          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) added a comment - Hello Debbie Kulling We have cross-checked this issue its working as expected also we tested this scenarios for some random EEs, 1. In plan “Universal Insurance Plan” consider benefit salary flag is selected as “Yes”. Therefore it will consider benefit salary of EE. 2. In Plan design>> Eligibility rule>> contingency settings , here as per the rule this “Universal Insurance Plan” is eligible to EE only if he is enrolled in “grandfather executive life insurance” . We can also see the flag “limit available coverage by elected amount in contingent plan” is set as “Yes” , refer below screen shot. Which means if you look at the grandfather plan, refer screen shot, coverage elected is 50,000. Now as per the EE Michael Funk benefit salary, refer figure below EE Michael Funk benefit salary is 1,30,500 , and in grandfather plan his coverage is elected as 50,000 . Therefore as per the calculation, 1.5 (as per settings for salary multiple in plan design) ** 1,30,500 = 1,95,750* Now from 1, 95,750 we will minus 50,000 coverage of grand father (as per the contigency setting refer figure above in this comment) therefore the amount is 1, 45,750 As per rounding rules in plan design>> cost and coverage we can see the round up value by 1000 i.e. 1, 46,000 on confirmation statement of an EE. refer figure below. The system is working fine as expected, please check and verify at your end. Thank you! --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC: Mandar Kulkarni , Vijay Siddha , Satya , Prasad Patil
          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made changes -
          Assignee Shailendra Honrao [ shailendra.honrao ] Debbie Kulling [ dkulling ]
          Resolution Fixed [ 1 ]
          Status Production Testing [ 10202 ] Production Complete [ 10028 ]
          ashwin.wankhede Ashwin Wankhede (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Progress(10206) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602)
          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made changes -
          Time Spent 9.3h [ 33480 ] 11.3h [ 40680 ]
          Worklog Id 52051 [ 52051 ]
          shailendra.honrao Shailendra Honrao (Inactive) made changes -
          Status Production Complete [ 10028 ] Closed [ 6 ]
          Hide
          shailendra.honrao Shailendra Honrao (Inactive) added a comment - - edited

          Reopen this to implement code for round up Coverage Amounts for other customization like Range Flat Amount, Range salary multiple and Range % of monthly salary on cost and coverage page.

          Show
          shailendra.honrao Shailendra Honrao (Inactive) added a comment - - edited Reopen this to implement code for round up Coverage Amounts for other customization like Range Flat Amount, Range salary multiple and Range % of monthly salary on cost and coverage page.
          shailendra.honrao Shailendra Honrao (Inactive) made changes -
          Status Closed [ 6 ] Reopen in Production [ 10027 ]
          shailendra.honrao Shailendra Honrao (Inactive) made changes -
          Status Reopen in Production [ 10027 ] In Development [ 10007 ]
          shailendra.honrao Shailendra Honrao (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602) Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Review(10208)
          jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
          Dev Due Date 05/Jun/2017 06/Jun/2017
          jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
          Assignee Debbie Kulling [ dkulling ] Shailendra Honrao [ shailendra.honrao ]
          shailendra.honrao Shailendra Honrao (Inactive) logged work - 05/Jun/17 12:41 PM
          • Time Spent:
            4.5h
             

            coding,unit testing,discussion

          shailendra.honrao Shailendra Honrao (Inactive) made changes -
          Time Spent 11.3h [ 40680 ] 15.8h [ 56880 ]
          Worklog Id 52289 [ 52289 ]
          umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
          Time Spent 15.8h [ 56880 ] 19.8h [ 71280 ]
          Worklog Id 52303 [ 52303 ]
          admin01 admin made changes -
          Sprint WT Sprint 30 -Bugs [ 70 ]
          umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) logged work - 05/Jun/17 04:30 PM
          • Time Spent:
            0.5h
             

            Discussion with Satya, Jyoti and Shailendra

          umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
          Time Spent 19.8h [ 71280 ] 20.3h [ 73080 ]
          Worklog Id 52413 [ 52413 ]
          shailendra.honrao Shailendra Honrao (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Review(10208) Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Local Testing(10209)
          shailendra.honrao Shailendra Honrao (Inactive) made changes -
          Code Review Date 06/Jun/2017
          shailendra.honrao Shailendra Honrao (Inactive) logged work - 06/Jun/17 05:30 AM
          • Time Spent:
            1.5h
             

            review,check in,unit testing

          umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
          Time Spent 20.3h [ 73080 ] 20.8h [ 74880 ]
          Worklog Id 52420 [ 52420 ]
          shailendra.honrao Shailendra Honrao (Inactive) made changes -
          Time Spent 20.8h [ 74880 ] 22.3h [ 80280 ]
          Worklog Id 52423 [ 52423 ]
          khandu.kshirsagar Khandu Kshirsagar (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Local Testing(10209) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600)
          rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
          Status In Development [ 10007 ] Local Testing [ 10200 ]
          rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
          Assignee Shailendra Honrao [ shailendra.honrao ] Sumeet.Kolge [ sumeet.kolge ]
          Hide
          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) added a comment -

          Hello Rakesh Roy ,

          As per our discussion I have tested the below mention scenarios for rounding up the coverage for the following

          • Offered – flat and salary multiple
          • Range flat amount
          • Salary multiple
          • Range salary multiple
          • Percentage of salary
          • Percentage of monthly salary
          • Percentage of weekly salary
          • Percentage of EE semi-monthly(24) salary
          • Percentage of EE per pay period salary
          • Range percentage of monthly salary

          The system is behaving as expected, no issues found for rounding Up coverage when selected "Yes, Round up to nearest " . This is ready for stage.
          (To note: Company tested this scenario on LB : Long)

          Thanks & Regards,
          Sumeet Kolge
          --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          CC: Mandar Kulkarni, Vijay Siddha, Satya, Jaideep Vinchurkar, Prasad Patil, Shailendra Honrao

          Show
          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) added a comment - Hello Rakesh Roy , As per our discussion I have tested the below mention scenarios for rounding up the coverage for the following Offered – flat and salary multiple Range flat amount Salary multiple Range salary multiple Percentage of salary Percentage of monthly salary Percentage of weekly salary Percentage of EE semi-monthly(24) salary Percentage of EE per pay period salary Range percentage of monthly salary The system is behaving as expected, no issues found for rounding Up coverage when selected "Yes, Round up to nearest " . This is ready for stage. (To note: Company tested this scenario on LB : Long) Thanks & Regards, Sumeet Kolge -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC: Mandar Kulkarni , Vijay Siddha , Satya , Jaideep Vinchurkar , Prasad Patil , Shailendra Honrao
          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made changes -
          Status Local Testing [ 10200 ] Stage Testing [ 10201 ]
          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Ready for Production(10217)
          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Ready for Production(10217) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)
          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) logged work - 06/Jun/17 11:09 AM
          • Time Spent:
            3.3h
             

            Analysis , discussion with teams, tried different scenarios for different options under cost and coverage for rounding up.

          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made changes -
          Time Spent 22.3h [ 80280 ] 25.6h [ 92160 ]
          Worklog Id 52539 [ 52539 ]
          mandark Mandar Kulkarni (Inactive) made changes -
          Resolution Fixed [ 1 ] Unresolved [ 10200 ]
          Status Stage Testing [ 10201 ] Reopen in Stage [ 10023 ]
          mandark Mandar Kulkarni (Inactive) made changes -
          Status Reopen in Stage [ 10023 ] In Development [ 10007 ]
          mandark Mandar Kulkarni (Inactive) made changes -
          Status In Development [ 10007 ] Local Testing [ 10200 ]
          mandark Mandar Kulkarni (Inactive) made changes -
          Status Local Testing [ 10200 ] Stage Testing [ 10201 ]
          mandark Mandar Kulkarni (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213)
          prasad.patil Prasad Patil (Inactive) made changes -
          Time Spent 25.6h [ 92160 ] 26.6h [ 95760 ]
          Worklog Id 52606 [ 52606 ]
          umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) logged work - 06/Jun/17 04:30 PM
          • Time Spent:
            0.5h
             

            Code review and Unit Testing

          prasad.patil Prasad Patil (Inactive) logged work - 06/Jun/17 10:42 PM
          • Time Spent:
            1h
             

            Analysis with sumeet

          khandu.kshirsagar Khandu Kshirsagar (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602)
          jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne logged work - 07/Jun/17 10:14 AM
          • Time Spent:
            0.25h
             

            discussion

          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) logged work - 07/Jun/17 12:30 PM
          • Time Spent:
            1h
             

            internal discussion with teams

          prasad.patil Prasad Patil (Inactive) made changes -
          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Re-open(10216)
          Hide
          prasad.patil Prasad Patil (Inactive) added a comment -

          Hi Shailendra Honrao,

          We tested this issue on stage for EE 'Michael Funk'

          Tested following option to determine the coverage amounts.

          Offered Amount - Flat amount
          Offered Amount - Salary multiple
          Range Flat amount
          Salary Multiple
          Range Salary Multiple
          Percentage of Salary
          Percentage of Monthly Salary
          Percentage of weekly Salary
          Percentage of Semi monthly salary24
          Percentage of employee Per pay period salary
          Range percentage of monthly salary

          Out of these the amount is not getting rounded for 'Offered Amount - Salary multiple' when the flag 'Limit Available Coverage By Elected Amount In Contingent Plan' on eligibility rules tab is set to 'Yes'. If this flag is set to 'No' the amount is getting rounded as expected.
          (Please refer the below screen shot )

          Another issue faced my us while testing was when we were trying to test the last option 'Range percentage of monthly salary'

          After selecting this option the flag 'Allow Salary Displayed On Enroll Now Screen' was automatically getting set as 'No' even after saving the page with the flag value as 'Yes'
          (Please refer the below screen shot.)

          On enroll now screen we were not able to test whether the amount is rounded or not
          (Please refer the below screenshot.)

          Request you to please look into this.
          Thank you!
          ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

          CC: Mandar Kulkarni, Vijay Siddha, Sumeet.Kolge, Jyoti Mayne, Jaideep Vinchurkar, Satya

          Show
          prasad.patil Prasad Patil (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Shailendra Honrao , We tested this issue on stage for EE 'Michael Funk' Tested following option to determine the coverage amounts. Offered Amount - Flat amount Offered Amount - Salary multiple Range Flat amount Salary Multiple Range Salary Multiple Percentage of Salary Percentage of Monthly Salary Percentage of weekly Salary Percentage of Semi monthly salary24 Percentage of employee Per pay period salary Range percentage of monthly salary Out of these the amount is not getting rounded for ' Offered Amount - Salary multiple ' when the flag ' Limit Available Coverage By Elected Amount In Contingent Plan ' on eligibility rules tab is set to ' Yes '. If this flag is set to ' No ' the amount is getting rounded as expected. (Please refer the below screen shot ) Another issue faced my us while testing was when we were trying to test the last option 'Range percentage of monthly salary' After selecting this option the flag 'Allow Salary Displayed On Enroll Now Screen' was automatically getting set as 'No' even after saving the page with the flag value as 'Yes' (Please refer the below screen shot.) On enroll now screen we were not able to test whether the amount is rounded or not (Please refer the below screenshot.) Request you to please look into this. Thank you! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CC: Mandar Kulkarni , Vijay Siddha , Sumeet.Kolge , Jyoti Mayne , Jaideep Vinchurkar , Satya
          prasad.patil Prasad Patil (Inactive) made changes -
          Assignee Sumeet.Kolge [ sumeet.kolge ] Shailendra Honrao [ shailendra.honrao ]
          prasad.patil Prasad Patil (Inactive) made changes -
          Time Spent 26.6h [ 95760 ] 29.6h [ 106560 ]
          Worklog Id 53008 [ 53008 ]
          prasad.patil Prasad Patil (Inactive) logged work - 07/Jun/17 09:35 PM
          • Time Spent:
            3h
             

            analysis and Discussion with team.

          prasad.patil Prasad Patil (Inactive) made changes -
          Time Spent 29.6h [ 106560 ] 30.6h [ 110160 ]
          Worklog Id 53267 [ 53267 ]
          jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne logged work - 08/Jun/17 11:21 AM
          • Time Spent:
            0.25h
             

            discussion

          shailendra.honrao Shailendra Honrao (Inactive) made changes -
          Status Stage Testing [ 10201 ] Reopen in Stage [ 10023 ]
          shailendra.honrao Shailendra Honrao (Inactive) made changes -
          Status Reopen in Stage [ 10023 ] In Development [ 10007 ]
          shailendra.honrao Shailendra Honrao (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Re-open(10216) Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Review(10208)
          shailendra.honrao Shailendra Honrao (Inactive) made changes -
          Dev Due Date 06/Jun/2017 08/Jun/2017
          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made changes -
          Time Spent 30.6h [ 110160 ] 31.6h [ 113760 ]
          Worklog Id 53353 [ 53353 ]
          shailendra.honrao Shailendra Honrao (Inactive) made changes -
          Code Review Date 06/Jun/2017 08/Jun/2017
          Code Reviewed By Amruta Lohiya [ 11906 ] Amruta Lohiya,Umesh Kadam [ 11906, 15302 ]
          Hide
          shailendra.honrao Shailendra Honrao (Inactive) added a comment -

          Hi Prasad Patil,

          We have fixed a code for Offered Amount - Salary multiple . Now it get rounded properly.

          Please verify.

          Thanks & regards,
          Shailendra Honrao

          cc:Satya,Umesh Kadam,Jyoti Mayne

          Show
          shailendra.honrao Shailendra Honrao (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Prasad Patil , We have fixed a code for Offered Amount - Salary multiple . Now it get rounded properly. Please verify. Thanks & regards, Shailendra Honrao cc: Satya , Umesh Kadam , Jyoti Mayne
          shailendra.honrao Shailendra Honrao (Inactive) logged work - 08/Jun/17 12:51 PM
          • Time Spent:
            6h
             

            reproducing issue,discussion with prasad,customization,code fix, unit test,review,code check in

          shailendra.honrao Shailendra Honrao (Inactive) made changes -
          Time Spent 31.6h [ 113760 ] 37.6h [ 135360 ]
          Worklog Id 53389 [ 53389 ]
          prasad.patil Prasad Patil (Inactive) logged work - 08/Jun/17 09:18 PM
          • Time Spent:
            1h
             

            Analysis and discussion with Shailendra.

          khandu.kshirsagar Khandu Kshirsagar (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Review(10208) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600)
          shailendra.honrao Shailendra Honrao (Inactive) made changes -
          Assignee Shailendra Honrao [ shailendra.honrao ] Sumeet.Kolge [ sumeet.kolge ]
          Hide
          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) added a comment -

          Hi Shailendra Honrao,

          Tested this issue on LB,

          Company name: Long
          Working fine for "Offered-salary multiple",
          Also crossed checked other fields like salary multiple, range salary multiple,percentage of salary, etc
          the values are getting roundup successfully.

          All the rules are working fine as expected , this is ready for stage.

          Thanks & Regards,
          Sumeet Kolge
          --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          CC: Mandar Kulkarni, Vijay Siddha, Satya, Jaideep Vinchurkar, Jyoti Mayne, Prasad Patil,

          Show
          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Shailendra Honrao , Tested this issue on LB, Company name: Long Working fine for "Offered-salary multiple", Also crossed checked other fields like salary multiple, range salary multiple,percentage of salary, etc the values are getting roundup successfully. All the rules are working fine as expected , this is ready for stage. Thanks & Regards, Sumeet Kolge -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC: Mandar Kulkarni , Vijay Siddha , Satya , Jaideep Vinchurkar , Jyoti Mayne , Prasad Patil ,
          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made changes -
          Status In Development [ 10007 ] Local Testing [ 10200 ]
          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213)
          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) logged work - 09/Jun/17 10:13 AM
          • Time Spent:
            3h
             

            Created same scenario on LB long, tested this issue for all fields.

          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made changes -
          Time Spent 37.6h [ 135360 ] 40.6h [ 146160 ]
          Worklog Id 53636 [ 53636 ]
          jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
          Time Spent 40.6h [ 146160 ] 40.85h [ 147060 ]
          Worklog Id 53637 [ 53637 ]
          prasad.patil Prasad Patil (Inactive) made changes -
          Time Spent 40.85h [ 147060 ] 42.85h [ 154260 ]
          Worklog Id 53664 [ 53664 ]
          jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
          Time Spent 42.85h [ 154260 ] 43.1h [ 155160 ]
          Worklog Id 53669 [ 53669 ]
          prasad.patil Prasad Patil (Inactive) logged work - 09/Jun/17 06:16 PM
          • Time Spent:
            2h
             

            analysis and discussion with team.

          umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
          Time Spent 43.1h [ 155160 ] 43.35h [ 156060 ]
          Worklog Id 53971 [ 53971 ]
          khandu.kshirsagar Khandu Kshirsagar (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602)
          Hide
          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) added a comment -

          Hello Shailendra Honrao,

          Tested the scenarios for " Offered-salary multiple" working fine as expected .
          Also crossed checked other fields salary multiple, range salary multiple, percentage of salary, etc working fine as expected.
          This is ready for production.

          Thanks & Regards,
          Sumeet kolge
          -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          CC: Mandar Kulkarni, Vijay Siddha, Satya, Jaideep Vinchurkar, Jyoti Mayne, Umesh Kadam

          Show
          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) added a comment - Hello Shailendra Honrao , Tested the scenarios for " Offered-salary multiple" working fine as expected . Also crossed checked other fields salary multiple, range salary multiple, percentage of salary, etc working fine as expected. This is ready for production. Thanks & Regards, Sumeet kolge ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC: Mandar Kulkarni , Vijay Siddha , Satya , Jaideep Vinchurkar , Jyoti Mayne , Umesh Kadam
          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Ready for Production(10217)
          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made changes -
          Status Local Testing [ 10200 ] Stage Testing [ 10201 ]
          prasad.patil Prasad Patil (Inactive) made changes -
          Time Spent 43.35h [ 156060 ] 45.35h [ 163260 ]
          Worklog Id 54187 [ 54187 ]
          umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) logged work - 12/Jun/17 04:30 PM
          • Time Spent:
            0.25h
             

            Discussion with Shailendra
            Stage code commit

          prasad.patil Prasad Patil (Inactive) logged work - 12/Jun/17 07:04 PM
          • Time Spent:
            2h
             

            Analysis and discussion with Sumeet.

          umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
          Time Spent 45.35h [ 163260 ] 45.85h [ 165060 ]
          Worklog Id 55155 [ 55155 ]
          khandu.kshirsagar Khandu Kshirsagar (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Ready for Production(10217) Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: Production Deployed(10221)
          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) logged work - 15/Jun/17 11:30 AM - edited
          • Time Spent:
            3.3h
             

            analysis made scenarios of plan and contingency on production, tested this issue on production.

          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made changes -
          Time Spent 45.85h [ 165060 ] 49.15h [ 176940 ]
          Worklog Id 55388 [ 55388 ]
          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made changes -
          Status Stage Testing [ 10201 ] Production Testing [ 10202 ]
          Hide
          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) added a comment -

          Hello Debbie Kulling

          Tested this issue on Production.
          Company name: Long
          Working fine for "Offered-salary multiple",
          Also crossed checked other fields like salary multiple, range salary multiple,percentage of salary, etc
          The values are getting roundup successfully on production, no issues found.

          Request you to please check and re-verify at your end. Thank you!
          ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          CC: Mandar Kulkarni, Jaideep Vinchurkar, Vijay Siddha, Rakesh Roy, Satya,Jyoti Mayne, Prasad Patil, Hrishikesh Deshpande

          Show
          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) added a comment - Hello Debbie Kulling Tested this issue on Production. Company name : Long Working fine for "Offered-salary multiple" , Also crossed checked other fields like salary multiple, range salary multiple,percentage of salary, etc The values are getting roundup successfully on production, no issues found. Request you to please check and re-verify at your end. Thank you! --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC: Mandar Kulkarni , Jaideep Vinchurkar , Vijay Siddha , Rakesh Roy , Satya , Jyoti Mayne , Prasad Patil , Hrishikesh Deshpande
          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made changes -
          Assignee Sumeet.Kolge [ sumeet.kolge ] Debbie Kulling [ dkulling ]
          Resolution Unresolved [ 10200 ] Fixed [ 1 ]
          Status Production Testing [ 10202 ] Production Complete [ 10028 ]
          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made changes -
          Worklog Id 55388 [ 55388 ]
          prasad.patil Prasad Patil (Inactive) made changes -
          Time Spent 49.15h [ 176940 ] 51.15h [ 184140 ]
          Worklog Id 55580 [ 55580 ]
          umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) logged work - 15/Jun/17 04:30 PM
          • Time Spent:
            0.5h
             

            Production code commit
            Discussion with Jyoti for "Case 14 'Range Percentage of Monthly Salary"

            • Verified history of collection manage file in stage and production
            • Case 14 is missing in production, so skipped related merge in production
          prasad.patil Prasad Patil (Inactive) logged work - 15/Jun/17 10:52 PM
          • Time Spent:
            2h
             

            Analysis and discussion with sumeet.

          rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
          Bug Severity Medium [ 16702 ]
          Bug Type Functional [ 15402 ]
          Code Review Date 08/Jun/2017 08/Jun/2017
          Dev Due Date 08/Jun/2017 08/Jun/2017
          rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
          Item State Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: Production Deployed(10221) Parent values: Production Complete(10222)Level 1 values: Closed(10223)
          satyap Satya made changes -
          Environment_New Stage [ 18443 ]
          dkulling Debbie Kulling made changes -
          Resolution Done [ 10000 ]
          Status Production Complete [ 10028 ] Closed [ 6 ]
          Transition Time In Source Status Execution Times
          Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made transition -
          Open In Development
          1d 10h 15m 1
          Shailendra Honrao (Inactive) made transition -
          Closed Reopen in Production
          8m 20s 1
          Shailendra Honrao (Inactive) made transition -
          Reopen in Production In Development
          32s 1
          Shailendra Honrao (Inactive) made transition -
          Stage Testing Reopened in Stage
          2d 38m 2
          Shailendra Honrao (Inactive) made transition -
          Reopened in Stage In Development
          6s 2
          Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made transition -
          In Development In LB Testing
          2d 4h 9m 4
          Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made transition -
          In LB Testing Stage Testing
          3d 5h 42m 4
          Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made transition -
          Stage Testing In Production Testing
          2d 23h 36m 2
          Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made transition -
          In Production Testing Production Complete
          10m 2s 2
          Debbie Kulling made transition -
          Production Complete Closed
          259d 6h 40m 2

            People

            Assignee:
            dkulling Debbie Kulling
            Reporter:
            dkulling Debbie Kulling
            Account Executive:
            Debbie Kulling
            Developer:
            Shailendra Honrao (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            5 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Dev Due Date:
              Code Review Date:

                Time Tracking

                Estimated:
                Original Estimate - 0h
                0h
                Remaining:
                Remaining Estimate - 0h
                0h
                Logged:
                Time Spent - 51.15h
                51.15h