-
Type:
New Feature
-
Status: In Progress
-
Priority:
Medium
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
Affects Version/s: None
-
Fix Version/s: Winter 2020 Enhancements
-
Labels:None
-
Company:CareerBuilder
-
Epic Link:
Overview:
A user to be notified that an email message did not go through due to end user's email system marking the message as spam.
Entry:
*User sends email message.
Acceptance Criteria:
*IF I send an email message to a user who's email system marked my email as spam, I am notified that the email did not go through / get delivered (either via pop-up immediately or through email).
*IF I send an email message to a user who's email system marked my email as spam, this is also reflected in the communication history that it did not go through/was not delivered, and reasoning.
Exit:
*User gets notification that the email did not go through due being marked as spam.
Prerequisites:
*User is a current user of DMS or consuming application.
1.
|
UX for Marked as Spam | DMS-888 |
|
Done | Aruna Raheja |
|
| Field | Original Value | New Value |
|---|---|---|
| Epic Link | DMS-220 [ 74298 ] |
Aruna Raheja - What have you seen done before? To me, a bounce, spam, service interruption are all reasons that a mail was undeliverable. Do you make a tab for Undeliverable, and then show reasons like bounce, spam etc, in the details?
Molly Ronovsky: As in discussion with Dev and Ravi, we concluded that Spam should not covered under Undeliverable because the mail is delivered in SPAM instead of Inbox. Your Suggestions?
Aruna Raheja
added a comment - Molly Ronovsky : As in discussion with Dev and Ravi, we concluded that Spam should not covered under Undeliverable because the mail is delivered in SPAM instead of Inbox. Your Suggestions?
CC: Mohd Belal Harshveer Singh Kristen Molly Ronovsky : We will be using 4 tabs.
CC: Kristen
Aruna Raheja
added a comment - Molly Ronovsky : We will be using 4 tabs.
CC: Kristen Aruna Raheja Yes, thanks
Prasad Patil (Inactive)
made changes -
| Resolution | Not in scope [ 10700 ] | |
| Status | To Do [ 10000 ] | Done [ 10001 ] |
Aruna Raheja
made changes -
| Resolution | Not in scope [ 10700 ] | |
| Status | Done [ 10001 ] | In Progress [ 3 ] |
Aruna Raheja
made changes -
| Status | In Progress [ 3 ] | To Do [ 10000 ] |
Aruna Raheja
made changes -
| Attachment | Communication History Spam.png [ 100491 ] | |
| Attachment | Email Spam.png [ 100492 ] |
Molly Ronovsky: Please check the attached mockups. In Spam case, we can't show immediate Popup as it is not technically feasible.
Aruna Raheja
added a comment - Molly Ronovsky : Please check the attached mockups. In Spam case, we can't show immediate Popup as it is not technically feasible.
CC: Kristen Harshveer Singh Aruna Raheja Looks good you can close.
Aruna Raheja
made changes -
| Status | To Do [ 10000 ] | In Progress [ 3 ] |
| Fix Version/s | Winter 2020 Enhancements [ 11314 ] |
| Remaining Estimate | 32h [ 115200 ] | |
| Original Estimate | 32h [ 115200 ] |
| Transition | Time In Source Status | Execution Times |
|---|
Prasad Patil (Inactive)
made transition
-
|
82d 13h 37m | 1 |
Aruna Raheja
made transition
-
|
7d 3h 4m | 1 |
Aruna Raheja
made transition
-
|
4s | 1 |
Aruna Raheja
made transition
-
|
4d 18h 46m | 1 |
Molly Ronovsky : Should we take spam as different tab along with Sent, Bounced and In Queue?
CC: Harshveer Singh Mohd Belal ShashiKant Mishra Samir Kristen