Uploaded image for project: 'New Features 2017'
  1. New Features 2017
  2. NF-53

UK Benefits:Implement Phone Number like Zip/Postal code based on Country selection on Import

    Details

    • Type: Enhancement
    • Status: Reopen in Production
    • Priority: Medium
    • Resolution: Done
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: None
    • Labels:
      None
    • Module:
      UK Benefits
    • Reported by:
      Harbinger
    • Item State:
      Stage QA - Production Deployment on Hold
    • Sprint:
      NF Sprint 3

      Description

      Currently Zip Code/Postal Code is on country selection. We will implement same for phone number. These two fields need not to consider in rule creation combination.
      Validations required:
      1.Regx update
      2.Import Validation
      3.EDS Validation

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

            chaitali.acharya Chaitali Acharya (Inactive) created issue -
            chaitali.acharya Chaitali Acharya (Inactive) made changes -
            Field Original Value New Value
            Assignee Suraj Sokasane [ suraj.sokasane ]
            chaitali.acharya Chaitali Acharya (Inactive) made changes -
            Link This issue relates to NF-3 [ NF-3 ]
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) logged work - 23/Jan/17 06:26 PM
            • Time Spent:
              4.5h
               
              <No comment>
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 32h [ 115200 ]
            Original Estimate 32h [ 115200 ]
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 32h [ 115200 ] 26h [ 93600 ]
            Time Spent 6h [ 21600 ]
            Worklog Id 20829 [ 20829 ]
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 26h [ 93600 ] 21.5h [ 77400 ]
            Time Spent 6h [ 21600 ] 10.5h [ 37800 ]
            Worklog Id 20830 [ 20830 ]
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) logged work - 24/Jan/17 03:40 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1h
               
              <No comment>
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 21.5h [ 77400 ] 20.5h [ 73800 ]
            Time Spent 10.5h [ 37800 ] 11.5h [ 41400 ]
            Worklog Id 20833 [ 20833 ]
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) logged work - 24/Jan/17 06:26 PM - edited
            • Time Spent:
              6h
               

              Discussion and analysis by comparing with Postal Code.

            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) logged work - 25/Jan/17 06:17 PM - edited
            • Time Spent:
              2h
               

              Analysis

            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) logged work - 27/Jan/17 08:16 AM - edited
            • Time Spent:
              4h
               

              coding For Employee

            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 20.5h [ 73800 ] 16.5h [ 59400 ]
            Time Spent 11.5h [ 41400 ] 15.5h [ 55800 ]
            Worklog Id 21399 [ 21399 ]
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 16.5h [ 59400 ] 14.5h [ 52200 ]
            Time Spent 15.5h [ 55800 ] 17.5h [ 63000 ]
            Worklog Id 21405 [ 21405 ]
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) logged work - 30/Jan/17 12:34 PM - edited
            • Time Spent:
              6.5h
               

              Coding and Unit testing for Beneficiary and dependents.

            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 14.5h [ 52200 ] 8h [ 28800 ]
            Time Spent 17.5h [ 63000 ] 24h [ 86400 ]
            Worklog Id 22020 [ 22020 ]
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) made changes -
            Worklog Id 22020 [ 22020 ]
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) made changes -
            Worklog Id 22020 [ 22020 ]
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) made changes -
            Worklog Id 21399 [ 21399 ]
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) made changes -
            Worklog Id 21405 [ 21405 ]
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) made changes -
            Worklog Id 20829 [ 20829 ]
            Hide
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) added a comment -

            During the analysis and development of the task, we found multiple scenarios.
            Such as:

            1. Should Import Considered for Phone Number validation
            2. Bug in Postal Code validation. (If country not given, it was validating according to default country as USA). It was corrected.
            3. Spouse Employer Work Phone extension was also considered in 10 digit validation.
            4. Decision about exactly which fields to be considered for validation. (Includes Employer level phone number fields)
            5. Multiple Phone Number fields for Beneficiary.
            6. Decision about uniqueness for Employee_Beneficiary and Employee_Emergency.

            All above points and daily tasks caused delay in the issue. Also, the issue has many scenarios for unit testing.

            CC_ Jaideep Vinchurkar

            Show
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) added a comment - During the analysis and development of the task, we found multiple scenarios. Such as: Should Import Considered for Phone Number validation Bug in Postal Code validation. (If country not given, it was validating according to default country as USA). It was corrected. Spouse Employer Work Phone extension was also considered in 10 digit validation. Decision about exactly which fields to be considered for validation. (Includes Employer level phone number fields) Multiple Phone Number fields for Beneficiary. Decision about uniqueness for Employee_Beneficiary and Employee_Emergency. All above points and daily tasks caused delay in the issue. Also, the issue has many scenarios for unit testing. CC_ Jaideep Vinchurkar
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) logged work - 31/Jan/17 02:09 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1.5h
               

              Unit testing and Discussion with Jaideep.

            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 8h [ 28800 ] 6.5h [ 23400 ]
            Time Spent 24h [ 86400 ] 25.5h [ 91800 ]
            Worklog Id 22106 [ 22106 ]
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) logged work - 03/Feb/17 02:06 PM
            • Time Spent:
              6h
               

              Beneficiary Import testing. Analyzing related issues and creating JIRA if required.

            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 6.5h [ 23400 ] 0.5h [ 1800 ]
            Time Spent 25.5h [ 91800 ] 31.5h [ 113400 ]
            Worklog Id 23010 [ 23010 ]
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) logged work - 06/Feb/17 12:54 PM
            • Time Spent:
              6.5h
               
              <No comment>
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 0.5h [ 1800 ] 0h [ 0 ]
            Time Spent 31.5h [ 113400 ] 38h [ 136800 ]
            Worklog Id 23271 [ 23271 ]
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) logged work - 07/Feb/17 03:28 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1.5h
               

              Unit testing.

            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) logged work - 09/Feb/17 07:07 AM
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               

              code review

            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 38h [ 136800 ] 38.5h [ 138600 ]
            Worklog Id 23888 [ 23888 ]
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Status New Request [ 10029 ] Pending for Approval [ 10002 ]
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Pending for Approval [ 10002 ] Approved for Development [ 10003 ]
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Approved for Development [ 10003 ] In Development [ 10007 ]
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Developer Suraj Sokasane [ suraj.sokasane ]
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Review(10208)
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Suraj Sokasane [ suraj.sokasane ] Sachin Hingole [ sachin.hingole ]
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) logged work - 09/Feb/17 12:30 PM
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               

              Code review and Check in.

            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 38.5h [ 138600 ] 39h [ 140400 ]
            Worklog Id 24071 [ 24071 ]
            khandu.kshirsagar Khandu Kshirsagar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Review(10208) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600)
            sachin.hingole Sachin Hingole (Inactive) made changes -
            Status In Development [ 10007 ] Local Testing [ 10200 ]
            sachin.hingole Sachin Hingole (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Sachin Hingole [ sachin.hingole ] Priya Dhamande [ priya.dhamande ]
            priya.dhamande Priya Dhamande (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210)
            prasadp Prasad Pise (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Priya Dhamande [ priya.dhamande ] Jayshree Nagpure [ jayshree.nagpure ]
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment Phone Number Status.xlt [ 39564 ]
            Hide
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Jayshree Nagpure

            For testing purpose, I've updated the Regex for two coutries on CAISO on LB.

            Country Home Phone Regex
            Afghanistan ^(\d {5}

            )$

            Albania ^(\d {7}

            )$

            Show
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Jayshree Nagpure For testing purpose, I've updated the Regex for two coutries on CAISO on LB. Country Home Phone Regex Afghanistan ^(\d {5} )$ Albania ^(\d {7} )$
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) logged work - 13/Feb/17 01:51 PM
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               

              Task discussion with suraj

            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 39h [ 140400 ] 39.5h [ 142200 ]
            Worklog Id 24663 [ 24663 ]
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) logged work - 13/Feb/17 02:27 PM
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               

              Task Discussion with Jayshree.

            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 39.5h [ 142200 ] 40h [ 144000 ]
            Worklog Id 24675 [ 24675 ]
            Hide
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) added a comment -

            Jayshree Nagpure,

            CC:Hrishikesh Deshpande,Prasad Pise

            For above enhancement consider below pages in Testing
            1]Demographics data Import
            2]Spouse Information Import
            3]Child Information Import
            4]Beneficiary Import
            5]Emergency contact Information Import.

            Validate Phone No with Country.

            Thanks,
            Rashmita

            Show
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) added a comment - Jayshree Nagpure , CC: Hrishikesh Deshpande , Prasad Pise For above enhancement consider below pages in Testing 1]Demographics data Import 2]Spouse Information Import 3]Child Information Import 4]Beneficiary Import 5]Emergency contact Information Import. Validate Phone No with Country. Thanks, Rashmita
            shyam.sharma shyam sharma (Inactive) made changes -
            Sprint NF Sprint 3 [ 42 ]
            hrishikesh.deshpande Hrishikesh Deshpande (Inactive) made changes -
            Link This issue relates to NF-6 [ NF-6 ]
            Hide
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Suraj Sokasane

            Company: caiso
            We have verified for below scenario:
            Demographics import
            Spouse import
            child import
            Beneficiary import
            emergency contact information import

            Successful import:
            demographics import
            child import
            Verified for positive and negative scenario.
            Working fine

            Import getting fail for below scenario:
            Spouse import
            Emergency contact information import

            And for beneficiary import: File went to bad with "Plan design does not exists"
            Even though Old plan design identifier name is entered correctly.

            Please refer linked jira WT-8447
            Thus updating item state as on hold on LB

            Thanks,
            Jayshree

            CC: Rashmita Dudhe Prasad Pise Rakesh Roy Jaideep Vinchurkar

            Show
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Suraj Sokasane Company: caiso We have verified for below scenario: Demographics import Spouse import child import Beneficiary import emergency contact information import Successful import: demographics import child import Verified for positive and negative scenario. Working fine Import getting fail for below scenario: Spouse import Emergency contact information import And for beneficiary import: File went to bad with "Plan design does not exists" Even though Old plan design identifier name is entered correctly. Please refer linked jira WT-8447 Thus updating item state as on hold on LB Thanks, Jayshree CC: Rashmita Dudhe Prasad Pise Rakesh Roy Jaideep Vinchurkar
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Link This issue is blocked by WT-8447 [ WT-8447 ]
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: On Hold(10211)
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment NF-53-Test cases.xls [ 39718 ]
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) logged work - 14/Feb/17 01:59 PM
            • Time Spent:
              6.5h
               

              Analysis, Internal discussion, Test case writing and LB testing

            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 40h [ 144000 ] 46.5h [ 167400 ]
            Worklog Id 25282 [ 25282 ]
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 46.5h [ 167400 ] 48h [ 172800 ]
            Worklog Id 25321 [ 25321 ]
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Link This issue relates to NF-196 [ NF-196 ]
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) logged work - 20/Feb/17 01:24 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1h
               

              LB regression testing for employee and child

            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 48h [ 172800 ] 49h [ 176400 ]
            Worklog Id 26167 [ 26167 ]
            Hide
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Suraj Sokasane,

            Verification is done for below scenario on Caiso:
            demographics import
            Spouse import and child import
            beneficiary and emergency contact import.
            Working as expected
            Updating item state as Ready for Stage.

            CC; Jaideep Vinchurkar Prasad Pise Rakesh Roy

            Show
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Suraj Sokasane , Verification is done for below scenario on Caiso: demographics import Spouse import and child import beneficiary and emergency contact import. Working as expected Updating item state as Ready for Stage. CC; Jaideep Vinchurkar Prasad Pise Rakesh Roy
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: On Hold(10211) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213)
            khandu.kshirsagar Khandu Kshirsagar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602)
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: In Testing(10214)
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Local Testing [ 10200 ] Pending for Stage Approval [ 10300 ]
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Pending for Stage Approval [ 10300 ] Approved for Stage [ 10030 ]
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Approved for Stage [ 10030 ] Stage Testing [ 10201 ]
            Hide
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Suraj Sokasane,

            Tested Below scenario on Caiso for HSPL on Stage:
            1)Demographics import
            2)Spouse import
            3)Child import
            4)Beneficiary import
            Working as expected.
            5)For Emergency contact verified on Austin for Hspl, As on caiso for hspl mapping fields emergency information for primary and secondary were not present.
            Mapped country and phone number.
            Working as expected.
            Thus Updating item State as Ready for Production.

            Thanks,
            Jayshree

            CC: Prasad Pise Rakesh Roy Jaideep Vinchurkar

            Show
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Suraj Sokasane , Tested Below scenario on Caiso for HSPL on Stage: 1)Demographics import 2)Spouse import 3)Child import 4)Beneficiary import Working as expected. 5)For Emergency contact verified on Austin for Hspl, As on caiso for hspl mapping fields emergency information for primary and secondary were not present. Mapped country and phone number. Working as expected. Thus Updating item State as Ready for Production. Thanks, Jayshree CC: Prasad Pise Rakesh Roy Jaideep Vinchurkar
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: In Testing(10214) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Ready for Production(10217)
            prasadp Prasad Pise (Inactive) logged work - 27/Feb/17 01:34 PM - edited
            • Time Spent:
              0.75h
               

              Internal Discussions with Jayshree for Scenario and JIRA Update

            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) logged work - 27/Feb/17 04:01 PM - edited
            • Time Spent:
              4.5h
               

              Stage testing

            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) made changes -
            Code Reviewed By Jaideep Vinchurkar [ 11908 ]
            ashwin.wankhede Ashwin Wankhede (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Ready for Production(10217) Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: Production Deployed(10221)
            prasadp Prasad Pise (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Stage Testing [ 10201 ] Pending for Production Approval [ 10301 ]
            prasadp Prasad Pise (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Pending for Production Approval [ 10301 ] Approved for production [ 10034 ]
            prasadp Prasad Pise (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Approved for production [ 10034 ] Production Testing [ 10202 ]
            prasadp Prasad Pise (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 49h [ 176400 ] 49.75h [ 179100 ]
            Worklog Id 27836 [ 27836 ]
            prasadp Prasad Pise (Inactive) made changes -
            Worklog Id 27836 [ 27836 ]
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 49.75h [ 179100 ] 54.25h [ 195300 ]
            Worklog Id 28241 [ 28241 ]
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Worklog Id 28241 [ 28241 ]
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: Production Deployed(10221) Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: In Testing(10218)
            Hide
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Suraj Sokasane,

            Tested on Production on Caiso for Hspl.
            Verified all above scenario.
            Working as expected.
            Thus updating item state as production complete.

            Thanks,
            Jayshree

            CC ;Jaideep Vinchurkar Prasad Pise Rakesh Roy

            Show
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Suraj Sokasane , Tested on Production on Caiso for Hspl. Verified all above scenario. Working as expected. Thus updating item state as production complete. Thanks, Jayshree CC ; Jaideep Vinchurkar Prasad Pise Rakesh Roy
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: In Testing(10218) Parent values: Production Complete(10222)Level 1 values: Closed(10223)
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Resolution Fixed [ 1 ]
            Status Production Testing [ 10202 ] Production Complete [ 10028 ]
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) logged work - 01/Mar/17 10:46 AM
            • Time Spent:
              2.5h
               

              Production testing

            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 54.25h [ 195300 ] 56.75h [ 204300 ]
            Worklog Id 28306 [ 28306 ]
            ashwin.wankhede Ashwin Wankhede (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Production Complete(10222)Level 1 values: Closed(10223) Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: Production Deployed(10221)
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: Production Deployed(10221) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Production Deployment on Hold(10224)
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) logged work - 02/Mar/17 01:29 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1h
               

              Revert the code from Production.

            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 56.75h [ 204300 ] 57.75h [ 207900 ]
            Worklog Id 28609 [ 28609 ]
            Hide
            shyam.sharma shyam sharma (Inactive) added a comment - - edited

            Suraj Sokasane Jayshree Nagpure Rakesh Roy : Can you please look in to this on high priority ? and also can you please update JIRA ticket why it is not working
            and how this is tested and verified on Production. please provide complete history and detail why this is reopened.

            Abhay Patil : I understand your concern and we will take appropriate action on this.
            Basically the issue is: In the current workflow if because of any reason after testing it gets failed then there is no option to change status as Re-open. We will soon modify our workflow to address ticket status issue. But anyhow I do agree with you that Dev & QA should update ticket with proper comments , as now it is giving impression that this issue is production complete but in actual it is not.

            Show
            shyam.sharma shyam sharma (Inactive) added a comment - - edited Suraj Sokasane Jayshree Nagpure Rakesh Roy : Can you please look in to this on high priority ? and also can you please update JIRA ticket why it is not working and how this is tested and verified on Production. please provide complete history and detail why this is reopened. Abhay Patil : I understand your concern and we will take appropriate action on this. Basically the issue is: In the current workflow if because of any reason after testing it gets failed then there is no option to change status as Re-open. We will soon modify our workflow to address ticket status issue. But anyhow I do agree with you that Dev & QA should update ticket with proper comments , as now it is giving impression that this issue is production complete but in actual it is not.
            shyam.sharma shyam sharma (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Production Complete [ 10028 ] Production Complete [ 10028 ]
            Hide
            shyam.sharma shyam sharma (Inactive) added a comment -

            Added one more step in workflow ReOpen on Production : Changed status of this ticket as ReOpen on Production

            Show
            shyam.sharma shyam sharma (Inactive) added a comment - Added one more step in workflow ReOpen on Production : Changed status of this ticket as ReOpen on Production
            Hide
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi All,

            Here are the details:

            What is the Enhancement:
            We took this Enhancement under UK benefits. Previously, phone number was validated as 10 digit only. But the enhancement implements country wise phone number validation. For example, now if country is UK, 11 digit phone number will be allowed.

            Why it failed :
            This is being implemented from UI as well as Import. Chaitali Acharya was doing UI part and I was doing Import part. The code is different but script is same. When Import ticket was marked as completed, I checked in the code but UK benefits team has kept all tickets on stage and hence the script wasn't gone to production and so it wasn't working on prod.

            Why Testing failed:
            Generally QA's follow process of testing the ticket on LB and Stage with full efforts. When it's on prod, not much efforts are wasted as if something is working on stage, only environment or check in related issues occur. Plus, if country is not given, we validate the phone number as per US format. Currently all countries allow 10 digit phone number. So, Jayshree Nagpure did not find the issue.

            As per shyam sharma,s comment the workflow does not allow to change status from production complete. But a informational comment could have been posted by us.

            Show
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) added a comment - Hi All, Here are the details: What is the Enhancement: We took this Enhancement under UK benefits. Previously, phone number was validated as 10 digit only. But the enhancement implements country wise phone number validation. For example, now if country is UK, 11 digit phone number will be allowed. Why it failed : This is being implemented from UI as well as Import. Chaitali Acharya was doing UI part and I was doing Import part. The code is different but script is same. When Import ticket was marked as completed, I checked in the code but UK benefits team has kept all tickets on stage and hence the script wasn't gone to production and so it wasn't working on prod. Why Testing failed: Generally QA's follow process of testing the ticket on LB and Stage with full efforts. When it's on prod, not much efforts are wasted as if something is working on stage, only environment or check in related issues occur. Plus, if country is not given, we validate the phone number as per US format. Currently all countries allow 10 digit phone number. So, Jayshree Nagpure did not find the issue. As per shyam sharma ,s comment the workflow does not allow to change status from production complete. But a informational comment could have been posted by us.
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Production Complete [ 10028 ] Production Complete [ 10028 ]
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Production Complete [ 10028 ] Production Complete [ 10028 ]
            shyam.sharma shyam sharma (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Production Complete [ 10028 ] Production Complete [ 10028 ]
            shyam.sharma shyam sharma (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Production Complete [ 10028 ] Reopen in Production [ 10027 ]
            shyam.sharma shyam sharma (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Jayshree Nagpure [ jayshree.nagpure ] Veronica Blanco [ veronica.blanco ]
            shyam.sharma shyam sharma (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Veronica Blanco [ veronica.blanco ] Jayshree Nagpure [ jayshree.nagpure ]
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) logged work - 06/Mar/17 01:14 PM
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               

              Internal discussion related to jira status

            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 57.75h [ 207900 ] 58.25h [ 209700 ]
            Worklog Id 29220 [ 29220 ]
            Transition Time In Source Status Execution Times
            Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made transition -
            New Request Pending for Approval
            21d 16h 33m 1
            Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made transition -
            Pending for Approval Approved for Development
            4s 1
            Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made transition -
            Approved for Development In Development
            2s 1
            Sachin Hingole (Inactive) made transition -
            In Development In LB Testing
            5h 38m 1
            Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made transition -
            In LB Testing Pending for Stage Approval
            17d 22h 7m 1
            Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made transition -
            Pending for Stage Approval Approved for Stage
            23s 1
            Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made transition -
            Approved for Stage Stage Testing
            5s 1
            Prasad Pise (Inactive) made transition -
            Stage Testing Pending for Production Approval
            19h 39m 1
            Prasad Pise (Inactive) made transition -
            Pending for Production Approval Approved for production
            3s 1
            Prasad Pise (Inactive) made transition -
            Approved for production In Production Testing
            3s 1
            Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made transition -
            In Production Testing Production Complete
            23h 50m 1
            shyam sharma (Inactive) made transition -
            Production Complete Production Complete
            5d 4h 20m 4
            shyam sharma (Inactive) made transition -
            Production Complete Reopen in Production
            14m 7s 1

              People

              Assignee:
              jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
              Reporter:
              chaitali.acharya Chaitali Acharya (Inactive)
              Developer:
              Suraj Sokasane (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              5 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:

                  Time Tracking

                  Estimated:
                  Original Estimate - 32h Original Estimate - 32h
                  32h
                  Remaining:
                  Remaining Estimate - 0h
                  0h
                  Logged:
                  Time Spent - 58.25h
                  58.25h