Uploaded image for project: 'New Features 2017'
  1. New Features 2017
  2. NF-5678

BioRad - e-Trade plan not showing up in Enroll Now when eligible

    Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Resolution Setting
    • Priority: High
    • Resolution: Done
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: UI Refresh
    • Labels:
    • Environment:
      Production
    • Bug Type:
      UI
    • Bug Severity:
      Medium
    • Level:
      Partner
    • Module:
      BenAdmin
    • Reported by:
      Implementation
    • Company:
      Bio-Rad
    • Stage Company Name:
      BioRad
    • Item State:
      Production Complete - Closed
    • Browser:
      IE 11, Google Chrome
    • Sprint:
      WT- Sprint 42

      Description

      When enrolling in the e-Trade plan, in production for BioRad, I have noticed that the type shows in the enroll now drop down however when selecting the type to enroll no plan shows. I checked the plan to see if maybe the plan needed to be resaved and I found that the increments are missing on production. I checked the cost and coverage tab for both the e-Trade plans against stage and production which then I noticed that on stage the increments show however on production they do not. I believe this could be why the plan is not showing in my enroll now section to enroll in. I am unable to get the increments to show. Please advise when this is updated on production. See screen shots attached.

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

            amjohnson Amannda Johnson created issue -
            Hide
            Vinayak.Kulkarni Vinayak Kulkarni (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Amannda Johnson

            "Range Percentage of Monthly Salary" is deployed and working on only stage, this functionality is not deployed into production and that is why those increments are missing in production site.

            "Range Percentage of Monthly Salary" is developed and deployed into stage as part of UK benefits, so as of now you have to change the flag "Coverage Amounts are Determined By" on Cost and Coverage page to other than range percentage of monthly salary in production.

            Show
            Vinayak.Kulkarni Vinayak Kulkarni (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Amannda Johnson "Range Percentage of Monthly Salary" is deployed and working on only stage, this functionality is not deployed into production and that is why those increments are missing in production site. "Range Percentage of Monthly Salary" is developed and deployed into stage as part of UK benefits, so as of now you have to change the flag "Coverage Amounts are Determined By" on Cost and Coverage page to other than range percentage of monthly salary in production.
            Hide
            amjohnson Amannda Johnson added a comment -

            Vinayak Kulkarni
            There is no other option to choose from for this type of plan for this client that will work as they are expecting. When can this be applied to production this way it can be used in production?

            CC:Robyn AdkisonJackie SivignyYamilka Coca

            Show
            amjohnson Amannda Johnson added a comment - Vinayak Kulkarni There is no other option to choose from for this type of plan for this client that will work as they are expecting. When can this be applied to production this way it can be used in production? CC: Robyn Adkison Jackie Sivigny Yamilka Coca
            Hide
            Vinayak.Kulkarni Vinayak Kulkarni (Inactive) added a comment -

            Amannda Johnson

            Will check with team and let you know about it. Thanks.

            Show
            Vinayak.Kulkarni Vinayak Kulkarni (Inactive) added a comment - Amannda Johnson Will check with team and let you know about it. Thanks.
            sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made changes -
            Field Original Value New Value
            Assignee Satya [ ID10004 ] Jyoti Mayne [ jyoti.mayne ]
            sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) logged work - 27/Dec/17 08:49 AM
            • Time Spent:
              40m
               

              Added plan on azure for checking the flag rage percentage of monthly salary
              Discussion with teams

            sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 0h [ 0 ]
            Time Spent 40m [ 2400 ]
            Worklog Id 98035 [ 98035 ]
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
            Attachment EE List.xlsx [ 70835 ]
            Hide
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne added a comment - - edited

            Hi Amannda Johnson,

            Right now as code is not there on production for this, to avoid this issue, you need to change the flag Coverage Amounts are Determined By on Cost and Coverage page as per requirement.

            We have only one option Percentage of Monthly Salary with single increment factor.

            We found following two plans having Range Percentage of Monthly Salary 1 to 10 is set.
            1. Employee Stock Purchase Plan
            2. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP)

            We have scanned all EE and found that attached 1850 EE List.xlsx employee are having election in these two plan. These EE data were loaded with import and the coverage amount was given in file itself. They are having coverage in the range of 1 to 10 percentage of monthly salary.

            Cc: Amruta Lohiya, Suraj Sokasane, Satya

            Show
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne added a comment - - edited Hi Amannda Johnson , Right now as code is not there on production for this, to avoid this issue, you need to change the flag Coverage Amounts are Determined By on Cost and Coverage page as per requirement. We have only one option Percentage of Monthly Salary with single increment factor. We found following two plans having Range Percentage of Monthly Salary 1 to 10 is set. 1. Employee Stock Purchase Plan 2. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP) We have scanned all EE and found that attached 1850 EE List.xlsx employee are having election in these two plan. These EE data were loaded with import and the coverage amount was given in file itself. They are having coverage in the range of 1 to 10 percentage of monthly salary. Cc: Amruta Lohiya , Suraj Sokasane , Satya
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
            Assignee Jyoti Mayne [ jyoti.mayne ] Amannda Johnson [ amjohnson ]
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne logged work - 27/Dec/17 03:29 PM
            • Time Spent:
              3h
               

              analysis, writing query to find salary percentage multiple, discussion with Suraj,Satya and Satya, JIRA Update

            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
            Time Spent 40m [ 2400 ] 3h 40m [ 13200 ]
            Worklog Id 98126 [ 98126 ]
            Hide
            amjohnson Amannda Johnson added a comment -

            Jyoti Mayne
            What would be the process to get the Coverage Amounts are Determined By "Range Percentage of Monthly Salary", as it shows in stage, to get moved up to production?

            CC: Jackie SivignyYamilka Coca

            Show
            amjohnson Amannda Johnson added a comment - Jyoti Mayne What would be the process to get the Coverage Amounts are Determined By "Range Percentage of Monthly Salary", as it shows in stage, to get moved up to production? CC: Jackie Sivigny Yamilka Coca
            amjohnson Amannda Johnson made changes -
            Assignee Amannda Johnson [ amjohnson ] Jyoti Mayne [ jyoti.mayne ]
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) made changes -
            Sprint WT- Sprint 42 [ 96 ]
            Original Estimate 0h [ 0 ]
            Hide
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne added a comment -

            Hi Amannda Johnson,

            This will get deploy on production with New UI refresh build.

            Cc: Amruta Lohiya

            Show
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne added a comment - Hi Amannda Johnson , This will get deploy on production with New UI refresh build. Cc: Amruta Lohiya
            amruta.lohiya Amruta Lohiya made changes -
            Component/s BenAdmin [ 10000 ]
            Key WT-12895 NF-5678
            Project WORKTERRA [ 10000 ] New Features 2017 [ 11000 ]
            amruta.lohiya Amruta Lohiya made changes -
            Status Open [ 1 ] In Development [ 10007 ]
            amruta.lohiya Amruta Lohiya made changes -
            Status In Development [ 10007 ] Local Testing [ 10200 ]
            amruta.lohiya Amruta Lohiya made changes -
            Status Local Testing [ 10200 ] Stage Testing [ 10201 ]
            amruta.lohiya Amruta Lohiya made changes -
            Assignee Jyoti Mayne [ jyoti.mayne ] Rashmita Dudhe [ rashmita.dudhe ]
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) logged work - 08/Jan/18 09:35 AM
            • Time Spent:
              2h
               

              Scenarios writing

            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210)
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Link This issue relates to NF-208 [ NF-208 ]
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment NF-5678.xls [ 71472 ]
            Hide
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) added a comment -

            Verified all attached scenarios on code map
            working fine as expected.

            Show
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) added a comment - Verified all attached scenarios on code map working fine as expected.
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) logged work - 09/Jan/18 09:35 AM - edited
            • Time Spent:
              3h
               

              Scenario testing on code map

            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 3h 40m [ 13200 ] 5h 40m [ 20400 ]
            Worklog Id 99727 [ 99727 ]
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 5h 40m [ 20400 ] 8h 40m [ 31200 ]
            Worklog Id 99728 [ 99728 ]
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213)
            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
            Link This issue is cloned by NF-5694 [ NF-5694 ]
            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
            Sprint WT- Sprint 42 [ 96 ]
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) made changes -
            Sprint WT- Sprint 42 [ 96 ]
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) made changes -
            Development Approval Yes [ 18474 ]
            Hide
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) added a comment - - edited

            As it is already deployed on pre-prod
            Verified all attached Scenarios on pre-prod.
            working fine as expected.

            Show
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) added a comment - - edited As it is already deployed on pre-prod Verified all attached Scenarios on pre-prod. working fine as expected.
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 8h 40m [ 31200 ] 12h 40m [ 45600 ]
            Worklog Id 99982 [ 99982 ]
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Ready for Production(10217)
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Worklog Id 99728 [ 99728 ]
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Worklog Id 99728 [ 99728 ]
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Link This issue relates to NF-208 [ NF-208 ]
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) logged work - 12/Jan/18 07:05 AM
            • Time Spent:
              4h
               
              <No comment>
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) logged work - 18/Jan/18 12:35 PM
            • Time Spent:
              2h
               

              Document creation

            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 12h 40m [ 45600 ] 14h 40m [ 52800 ]
            Worklog Id 100932 [ 100932 ]
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment New Feature and Functionality _NF-5678.doc [ 71983 ]
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) made changes -
            Hide
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi All,

            Attaching the production deployment approval email for reference

            Regards
            Gaurav

            Show
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) added a comment - Hi All, Attaching the production deployment approval email for reference Regards Gaurav
            gaurav.sodani Gaurav Sodani (Inactive) made changes -
            Deployment Approval Approved for production deployment [ 18457 ]
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment New Feature and Functionality _NF-5678.doc [ 71983 ]
            nidhi.kaul Nidhi Kaul (Inactive) made changes -
            Component/s UI Refresh [ 10902 ]
            nidhi.kaul Nidhi Kaul (Inactive) made changes -
            Labels Sprint_42
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Stage Testing [ 10201 ] Production Testing [ 10202 ]
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Ready for Production(10217) Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: In Testing(10218)
            Hide
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) added a comment -

            Verified all attached Scenarios on prod.
            working fine as expected.

            Show
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) added a comment - Verified all attached Scenarios on prod. working fine as expected.
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 14h 40m [ 52800 ] 16h 40m [ 60000 ]
            Worklog Id 106992 [ 106992 ]
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Resolution Bug Fixed [ 10402 ]
            Status Production Testing [ 10202 ] Production Complete [ 10028 ]
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: In Testing(10218) Parent values: Production Complete(10222)Level 1 values: Closed(10223)
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Resolution Bug Fixed [ 10402 ]
            Status Production Complete [ 10028 ] Closed [ 6 ]
            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) logged work - 05/Mar/18 10:07 AM - edited
            • Time Spent:
              2h
               

              production testing

            rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made changes -
            Worklog Id 106992 [ 106992 ]
            sachin.hingole Sachin Hingole (Inactive) made changes -
            Resolution Done [ 10000 ]
            Status Closed [ 6 ] Resolution Setting [ 11616 ]
            Hide
            Monika.Demla Monika Demla (Inactive) added a comment -

            Is this a BUG or new Feature?

            Show
            Monika.Demla Monika Demla (Inactive) added a comment - Is this a BUG or new Feature?
            Hide
            amjohnson Amannda Johnson added a comment -

            This was a feature that was on stage that we found out AFTER the client went live the feature was not on production.  Development moved build from stage to production.  

            Show
            amjohnson Amannda Johnson added a comment - This was a feature that was on stage that we found out AFTER the client went live the feature was not on production.  Development moved build from stage to production.  
            Hide
            Monika.Demla Monika Demla (Inactive) added a comment -

            Thank you Amannda Johnson

            Is this okay to close or does this need further research?

            Show
            Monika.Demla Monika Demla (Inactive) added a comment - Thank you Amannda Johnson Is this okay to close or does this need further research?
            Transition Time In Source Status Execution Times
            Amruta Lohiya made transition -
            Open In Development
            12d 11h 11m 1
            Amruta Lohiya made transition -
            In Development In LB Testing
            5s 1
            Amruta Lohiya made transition -
            In LB Testing Stage Testing
            5s 1
            Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made transition -
            Stage Testing In Production Testing
            55d 37m 1
            Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made transition -
            In Production Testing Production Complete
            17m 25s 1
            Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive) made transition -
            Production Complete Closed
            1h 5m 1
            Sachin Hingole (Inactive) made transition -
            Closed Resolution Setting
            52d 15h 1

              People

              Assignee:
              rashmita.dudhe Rashmita Dudhe (Inactive)
              Reporter:
              amjohnson Amannda Johnson
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              6 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:

                  Time Tracking

                  Estimated:
                  Original Estimate - 0h
                  0h
                  Remaining:
                  Remaining Estimate - 0h
                  0h
                  Logged:
                  Time Spent - 16h 40m
                  16h 40m