Uploaded image for project: 'WORKTERRA'
  1. WORKTERRA
  2. WT-10303

Ledcor Beneficiary Load - Trust record

    Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Production Complete
    • Priority: Medium
    • Resolution: Done
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: BenAdmin
    • Labels:
      None
    • Environment:
      Stage
    • Bug Type:
      Functional
    • Bug Severity:
      Medium
    • Module:
      BenAdmin - Import
    • Reported by:
      Support
    • Item State:
      Production Complete - Closed
    • Sprint:
      WT Sprint 35 - Bugs

      Description

      Hi,
      For the import template Bene_No DOB_Trust the Trust Record imported is kicking out with the error Dependent Date of Birth is required. The record being imported (see bad file) has a relationship type of Trust so do not understand why this is not loading. I thought if the relationship is defined as Trust then the Beneficiary Trust Name field is populated and the Beneficiary First Name, Beneficiary Last Name, Beneficiary Date of Birth are not required.
      Can you please take a look at this import and let me know what is missing.
      I did try to map the Beneficiary Date of Birth field but received an Import Failed error.
      Thanks!
      Cindy

        Attachments

        1. customization.jpg
          customization.jpg
          222 kB
        2. Date of birth load.jpg
          Date of birth load.jpg
          174 kB
        3. employee history.jpg
          employee history.jpg
          198 kB
        4. QNI_5_Beneficiaries_2017-07-20.zip
          0.5 kB
        5. QuincyImport.jpg
          QuincyImport.jpg
          98 kB

          Issue Links

            Activity

            Cindy.Wibbing Cindy Wibbing (Inactive) created issue -
            Hide
            mandark Mandar Kulkarni (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi @suraj,
            Could you please check this? Thanks.

            ---------------------------------------------------------------
            CC: Vijay Siddha, Satya, Jaideep Vinchurkar

            Show
            mandark Mandar Kulkarni (Inactive) added a comment - Hi @suraj, Could you please check this? Thanks. --------------------------------------------------------------- CC: Vijay Siddha , Satya , Jaideep Vinchurkar
            mandark Mandar Kulkarni (Inactive) made changes -
            Field Original Value New Value
            Assignee Vijay Siddha [ vijays ] Suraj Sokasane [ suraj.sokasane ]
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Suraj Sokasane [ suraj.sokasane ] Vishal Bajad [ vishal.bajad ]
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Open [ 1 ] In Progress [ 3 ]
            Hide
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) added a comment - - edited

            Hi Cindy Wibbing ,

            With initial analysis, Please find below observations,

            • For Beneficiary Imports, followings fields are mandatory
            1. Employee SSN
            2. Beneficiary First Name
            3. Beneficiary Last Name
            4. Beneficiary Date of Birth
            5. Beneficiary Relationship
            6. Beneficiary Old plan design identifier
            7. Beneficiary Type
            • We are able to import files with Beneficiary Date of Birth , please referred following customization
            • We have even tried with "Test Ben Trust" file import but its goes to bad.

            Please let us know if you have any query.

            Thanks !

            Show
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) added a comment - - edited Hi Cindy Wibbing , With initial analysis, Please find below observations, For Beneficiary Imports, followings fields are mandatory Employee SSN Beneficiary First Name Beneficiary Last Name Beneficiary Date of Birth Beneficiary Relationship Beneficiary Old plan design identifier Beneficiary Type We are able to import files with Beneficiary Date of Birth , please referred following customization We have even tried with "Test Ben Trust" file import but its goes to bad. Please let us know if you have any query. Thanks !
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment customization.jpg [ 56861 ]
            Attachment Date of birth load.jpg [ 56862 ]
            Attachment employee history.jpg [ 56863 ]
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Vishal Bajad [ vishal.bajad ] Cindy Wibbing [ cindy.wibbing ]
            Resolution Done [ 10000 ]
            Status In Progress [ 3 ] Resolved [ 5 ]
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) logged work - 26/Jul/17 02:43 PM
            • Time Spent:
              3h
               
              <No comment>
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 0h [ 0 ]
            Time Spent 3h [ 10800 ]
            Worklog Id 66651 [ 66651 ]
            Hide
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Cindy Wibbing,

            This is because of Implementation of unique fields for dependent Import in which "Dependent Date of Birth" was marked as Unique and Mandatory. Please ref "WT-7755 Dependent Import - Validation For unique fields" for more details.

            We need to take this as a new change request so Please suggest the same.

            Thanks !

            CC : Amit Thorve Vijay Siddha Satya Jaideep Vinchurkar Suraj Sokasane

            Show
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Cindy Wibbing , This is because of Implementation of unique fields for dependent Import in which "Dependent Date of Birth" was marked as Unique and Mandatory. Please ref " WT-7755 Dependent Import - Validation For unique fields" for more details. We need to take this as a new change request so Please suggest the same. Thanks ! CC : Amit Thorve Vijay Siddha Satya Jaideep Vinchurkar Suraj Sokasane
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) made changes -
            Link This issue is caused by WT-7755 [ WT-7755 ]
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) logged work - 27/Jul/17 01:53 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1h
               

              Query Resolution

            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 3h [ 10800 ] 4h [ 14400 ]
            Worklog Id 67396 [ 67396 ]
            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) logged work - 27/Jul/17 01:58 PM
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               

              discussion with vishal

            suraj.sokasane Suraj Sokasane (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 4h [ 14400 ] 4.5h [ 16200 ]
            Worklog Id 67400 [ 67400 ]
            Hide
            amitthorve Amit Thorve (Inactive) added a comment - - edited

            Vishal Bajad This is not a dependent import. This is beneficiary import and DOB should not be mandatory for the same.

            I don't know how this will be treated as new change. While making code changes in ticket no. WT-7755 the beneficiary import should have been excluded from mandatory checks.

            CC-Abhay Patil, Jennifer Leugers, Nick,Vijay Siddha,Cindy Wibbing

            Show
            amitthorve Amit Thorve (Inactive) added a comment - - edited Vishal Bajad This is not a dependent import. This is beneficiary import and DOB should not be mandatory for the same. I don't know how this will be treated as new change. While making code changes in ticket no. WT-7755 the beneficiary import should have been excluded from mandatory checks. CC- Abhay Patil , Jennifer Leugers , Nick , Vijay Siddha , Cindy Wibbing
            amitthorve Amit Thorve (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Cindy Wibbing [ cindy.wibbing ] Vishal Bajad [ vishal.bajad ]
            amitthorve Amit Thorve (Inactive) made changes -
            Resolution Done [ 10000 ]
            Status Resolved [ 5 ] Reopened [ 4 ]
            Hide
            abhay.patil Abhay Patil (Inactive) added a comment -

            Vishal Bajad - can you please take it ahead as a bug? This is NOT a change request. CC Satya Vijay Siddha

            Show
            abhay.patil Abhay Patil (Inactive) added a comment - Vishal Bajad - can you please take it ahead as a bug? This is NOT a change request. CC Satya Vijay Siddha
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Issue Type Support Activity [ 10301 ] Bug [ 1 ]
            Support Task Type Data Load [ 11401 ]
            Workflow WT_Support [ 47849 ] WT_Defects [ 48357 ]
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Reopened [ 4 ] In Development [ 10007 ]
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Developer Vishal Bajad [ vishal.bajad ]
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Analysis(10204)
            Module Parent values: BenAdmin(10100) Parent values: BenAdmin(10100)Level 1 values: Import(10111)
            QA Jayshree Nagpure [ jayshree.nagpure ]
            Original Estimate 10h [ 36000 ]
            Hide
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Abhay Patil,

            We will plan this bug in next week.

            Show
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Abhay Patil , We will plan this bug in next week.
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) logged work - 07/Aug/17 02:18 PM
            • Time Spent:
              2h
               

              analysis and understanding business logic.

            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 4.5h [ 16200 ] 6.5h [ 23400 ]
            Worklog Id 69811 [ 69811 ]
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) made changes -
            Code Reviewed By Jaideep Vinchurkar [ 11908 ]
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Analysis(10204) Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Review(10208)
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) logged work - 09/Aug/17 02:01 PM
            • Time Spent:
              8h
               

              Analysis , Understanding business logic , Code changes and unit testing.

            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 6.5h [ 23400 ] 14.5h [ 52200 ]
            Worklog Id 70567 [ 70567 ]
            Hide
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi ,

            This issue has been resolved and its pending for code review. it will get deployed with next deployment patch once we done with code review.

            Thanks !

            Show
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) added a comment - Hi , This issue has been resolved and its pending for code review. it will get deployed with next deployment patch once we done with code review. Thanks !
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) logged work - 09/Aug/17 02:34 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1h
               

              code review and discussions

            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 14.5h [ 52200 ] 15.5h [ 55800 ]
            Worklog Id 70597 [ 70597 ]
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Code Review Date 09/Aug/2017
            Component/s BenAdmin [ 10000 ]
            Sprint WT Sprint 34-Bugs [ 79 ]
            khandu.kshirsagar Khandu Kshirsagar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Review(10208) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600)
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Vishal Bajad [ vishal.bajad ] Jayshree Nagpure [ jayshree.nagpure ]
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) made changes -
            Status In Development [ 10007 ] Local Testing [ 10200 ]
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210)
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) logged work - 10/Aug/17 01:34 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1h
               

              Testing on LB in Progress

            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 15.5h [ 55800 ] 16.5h [ 59400 ]
            Worklog Id 70930 [ 70930 ]
            ashwin.wankhede Ashwin Wankhede (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600)
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210)
            Hide
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Vishal Bajad,

            Verified on Lb
            Company - QA City of Durham

            Verified below scenario for beneficiary import :
            1)Not given Date of birth in beneficiary template - Import is done successfully for "Trust","Business associate", and "Other" beneficiary.
            2)Not given Date of birth in beneficiary template - File wents to bad - "Dependent Date of birth is required" for beneficiary "Spouse","Child","Domestic partner","Employee","Friend","Other Relative","Parents","Sibling"
            3)When DOB is given for spouse, child etc , it must be marked unique - Import done successfully
            4)For Business associate and Others, Date of birth given in file is shown in beneficiary page.and for Trust it has no DOB

            Working fine as expected.

            Marking item state as Ready for stage

            Thanks,
            Jayshree

            cc : Rakesh Roy Prasad Pise

            Show
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Vishal Bajad , Verified on Lb Company - QA City of Durham Verified below scenario for beneficiary import : 1)Not given Date of birth in beneficiary template - Import is done successfully for "Trust","Business associate", and "Other" beneficiary. 2)Not given Date of birth in beneficiary template - File wents to bad - "Dependent Date of birth is required" for beneficiary "Spouse","Child","Domestic partner","Employee","Friend","Other Relative","Parents","Sibling" 3)When DOB is given for spouse, child etc , it must be marked unique - Import done successfully 4)For Business associate and Others, Date of birth given in file is shown in beneficiary page.and for Trust it has no DOB Working fine as expected. Marking item state as Ready for stage Thanks, Jayshree cc : Rakesh Roy Prasad Pise
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213)
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Production Due Date 17/Aug/2017
            Stage Due Date 14/Aug/17 [ 2017-08-14 ]
            khandu.kshirsagar Khandu Kshirsagar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602)
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Local Testing [ 10200 ] Stage Testing [ 10201 ]
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: In Testing(10214)
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) logged work - 14/Aug/17 12:17 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1.5h
               

              Stage testing

            Hide
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment -

            Verified on Stage
            Company - city of bellevue for hspl

            Verified below scenario for beneficiary import :
            1)Not given Date of birth in beneficiary template - Import is done successfully for "Trust","Business associate", and "Other" beneficiary.
            2)Not given Date of birth in beneficiary template - File wents to bad - "Dependent Date of birth is required" for beneficiary "Spouse","Child","Domestic partner","Employee","Friend","Other Relative","Parents","Sibling"
            3)When DOB is given for spouse, child etc , it must be marked unique - Import done successfully
            4)For Business associate and Others, Date of birth given in file is shown in beneficiary page.and for Trust it has no DOB

            Working fine as expected.
            Marking item state as Ready for Prouduction

            Show
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment - Verified on Stage Company - city of bellevue for hspl Verified below scenario for beneficiary import : 1)Not given Date of birth in beneficiary template - Import is done successfully for "Trust","Business associate", and "Other" beneficiary. 2)Not given Date of birth in beneficiary template - File wents to bad - "Dependent Date of birth is required" for beneficiary "Spouse","Child","Domestic partner","Employee","Friend","Other Relative","Parents","Sibling" 3)When DOB is given for spouse, child etc , it must be marked unique - Import done successfully 4)For Business associate and Others, Date of birth given in file is shown in beneficiary page.and for Trust it has no DOB Working fine as expected. Marking item state as Ready for Prouduction
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 16.5h [ 59400 ] 18h [ 64800 ]
            Worklog Id 71440 [ 71440 ]
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: In Testing(10214) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Ready for Production(10217)
            Hide
            Cindy.Wibbing Cindy Wibbing (Inactive) added a comment -

            Jayshree Nagpure
            Per your notes it looks like you are still making DOB a required field for Beneficiary loads. Can you please verify that this is not a required field for a beneficiary load. The spouse and child records are independent and have to be loaded in the Spouse and Child table.

            Per Amit's remarks the requirement should not be on the Beneficiary load.

            cc Amit Thorve

            Show
            Cindy.Wibbing Cindy Wibbing (Inactive) added a comment - Jayshree Nagpure Per your notes it looks like you are still making DOB a required field for Beneficiary loads. Can you please verify that this is not a required field for a beneficiary load. The spouse and child records are independent and have to be loaded in the Spouse and Child table. Per Amit's remarks the requirement should not be on the Beneficiary load. cc Amit Thorve
            Hide
            Cindy.Wibbing Cindy Wibbing (Inactive) added a comment -

            Jayshree Nagpure
            Can you please make sure the change is made to not make the Date of Birth mandatory for all beneficiary types.
            Thanks!
            Cindy

            Show
            Cindy.Wibbing Cindy Wibbing (Inactive) added a comment - Jayshree Nagpure Can you please make sure the change is made to not make the Date of Birth mandatory for all beneficiary types. Thanks! Cindy
            Hide
            amitthorve Amit Thorve (Inactive) added a comment -

            Jayshree Nagpure and Jaideep Vinchurkar This DOB should not be mandatory for any Beneficiary Type.

            Show
            amitthorve Amit Thorve (Inactive) added a comment - Jayshree Nagpure and Jaideep Vinchurkar This DOB should not be mandatory for any Beneficiary Type.
            amitthorve Amit Thorve (Inactive) made changes -
            Resolution Unresolved [ 10200 ]
            Status Stage Testing [ 10201 ] Reopen in Stage [ 10023 ]
            Hide
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) added a comment -

            Please feasibility of this request.
            If we remove DOB from all types beneficiary, it should not allow, spouse and children as beneficiery that are not present in system

            Show
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) added a comment - Please feasibility of this request. If we remove DOB from all types beneficiary, it should not allow, spouse and children as beneficiery that are not present in system
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Jayshree Nagpure [ jayshree.nagpure ] Vishal Bajad [ vishal.bajad ]
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Reopen in Stage [ 10023 ] In Development [ 10007 ]
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Ready for Production(10217) Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Analysis(10204)
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Sprint WT Sprint 34-Bugs [ 79 ] WT Sprint 35 - Bugs [ 81 ]
            Hide
            Cindy.Wibbing Cindy Wibbing (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Jaideep Vinchurkar
            We do not want the DOB to be mandatory on the Spouse or Child Relationships either. They should already be in the Spouse or Child tables in the Spouse Load or the Child Load.

            cc Amit Thorve

            Show
            Cindy.Wibbing Cindy Wibbing (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Jaideep Vinchurkar We do not want the DOB to be mandatory on the Spouse or Child Relationships either. They should already be in the Spouse or Child tables in the Spouse Load or the Child Load. cc Amit Thorve
            Hide
            amitthorve Amit Thorve (Inactive) added a comment -

            Jaideep Vinchurkar I dont know what you are talking here.

            If the spouse or child is not exists in the system and when we add them as beneficiary are they getting added in the Employee_DependentSpouse/Employee_DependentChild tables?

            Can we discuss this on call?

            Show
            amitthorve Amit Thorve (Inactive) added a comment - Jaideep Vinchurkar I dont know what you are talking here. If the spouse or child is not exists in the system and when we add them as beneficiary are they getting added in the Employee_DependentSpouse/Employee_DependentChild tables? Can we discuss this on call?
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) logged work - 17/Aug/17 04:28 PM
            • Time Spent:
              4h
               

              Done with suggested changes and ready for review.

            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 18h [ 64800 ] 22h [ 79200 ]
            Worklog Id 72304 [ 72304 ]
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Analysis(10204) Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Review(10208)
            Hide
            Cindy.Wibbing Cindy Wibbing (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi,
            Do we have any update on the status?
            White Label asking for timeframe.
            Thanks!
            Cindy

            Show
            Cindy.Wibbing Cindy Wibbing (Inactive) added a comment - Hi, Do we have any update on the status? White Label asking for timeframe. Thanks! Cindy
            Hide
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) added a comment -

            We are done with code changes. By today end of the day the change will go on local test environment. QA will update with stage and production dates.
            Amit Thorve and Cindy Wibbing: Previously we were having a bug in system, where import is allowing beneficiary as spouse or child but there was no check of their existence in system. i.e. a spouse beneficiary can added though he/she not present in system. In My above comments, I just want make Vishal Bajad aware of this issue, so that his code fix should introduce this issue again. my comments were only meant for developer.

            Show
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) added a comment - We are done with code changes. By today end of the day the change will go on local test environment. QA will update with stage and production dates. Amit Thorve and Cindy Wibbing : Previously we were having a bug in system, where import is allowing beneficiary as spouse or child but there was no check of their existence in system. i.e. a spouse beneficiary can added though he/she not present in system. In My above comments, I just want make Vishal Bajad aware of this issue, so that his code fix should introduce this issue again. my comments were only meant for developer.
            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) logged work - 18/Aug/17 07:23 AM
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               

              code review

            jaideep.vinchurkar Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 22h [ 79200 ] 22.5h [ 81000 ]
            Worklog Id 72385 [ 72385 ]
            rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
            Bug Type Functional [ 15402 ]
            Code Review Date 09/Aug/2017 09/Aug/2017
            Production Due Date 17/Aug/2017 17/Aug/2017
            Stage Due Date 14/Aug/17 [ 2017-08-14 ] 14/Aug/17 [ 2017-08-14 ]
            khandu.kshirsagar Khandu Kshirsagar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Review(10208) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600)
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Vishal Bajad [ vishal.bajad ] Jayshree Nagpure [ jayshree.nagpure ]
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Status In Development [ 10007 ] Local Testing [ 10200 ]
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210)
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) logged work - 23/Aug/17 02:09 PM
            • Time Spent:
              2.5h
               

              Testing on LB

            Hide
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment -

            verified on LB
            Company - city of durham

            Verified below scenario for beneficiary import :
            1)Not given Date of birth in beneficiary template - Import is done successfully for "Trust","Business associate", and "Other" , "Spouse","Child","Domestic partner","Employee","Friend","Other Relative","Parents","Sibling"
            3)When DOB is given for spouse, child etc , its uniqueness has been removed - not necessary to mark DOB field unique(Without uniqueness import is done successful)
            4)For Trust","Business associate", and "Other" ,"Domestic partner","Employee","Friend","Other Relative","Parents","Sibling" - Date of birth is inserted in beneficiary page.
            5)If spouse/child no exists in system - file wents to bad with proper error message("No such child/spouse exists")

            Working fine as expected
            Marking item state as ready for stage

            Thanks,
            Jayshree

            cc : Rakesh Roy Prasad Pise

            Show
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment - verified on LB Company - city of durham Verified below scenario for beneficiary import : 1)Not given Date of birth in beneficiary template - Import is done successfully for "Trust","Business associate", and "Other" , "Spouse","Child","Domestic partner","Employee","Friend","Other Relative","Parents","Sibling" 3)When DOB is given for spouse, child etc , its uniqueness has been removed - not necessary to mark DOB field unique(Without uniqueness import is done successful) 4)For Trust","Business associate", and "Other" ,"Domestic partner","Employee","Friend","Other Relative","Parents","Sibling" - Date of birth is inserted in beneficiary page. 5)If spouse/child no exists in system - file wents to bad with proper error message("No such child/spouse exists") Working fine as expected Marking item state as ready for stage Thanks, Jayshree cc : Rakesh Roy Prasad Pise
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213)
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Production Due Date 17/Aug/2017 29/Aug/2017
            Stage Due Date 14/Aug/17 [ 2017-08-14 ] 28/Aug/17 [ 2017-08-28 ]
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 22.5h [ 81000 ] 25h [ 90000 ]
            Worklog Id 73896 [ 73896 ]
            khandu.kshirsagar Khandu Kshirsagar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602)
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: In Testing(10214)
            Hide
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment -

            verified on Stage
            Company - city of bellevue for hspl

            Verified below scenario for beneficiary import :
            1)Not given Date of birth in beneficiary template - Import is done successfully for "Trust","Business associate", and "Other" , "Spouse","Child","Domestic partner","Employee","Friend","Other Relative","Parents","Sibling"
            3)When DOB is given for spouse, child etc , its uniqueness has been removed - not necessary to mark DOB field unique(Without uniqueness import is done successful)
            4)For Trust","Business associate", and "Other" ,"Domestic partner","Employee","Friend","Other Relative","Parents","Sibling" - Date of birth is inserted in beneficiary page.
            5)If spouse/child no exists in system - file wents to bad with proper error message("No such child/spouse exists")

            Working fine as expected
            Marking item state as ready for Production

            Thanks,
            Jayshree

            cc : Rakesh Roy Prasad Pise

            Show
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment - verified on Stage Company - city of bellevue for hspl Verified below scenario for beneficiary import : 1)Not given Date of birth in beneficiary template - Import is done successfully for "Trust","Business associate", and "Other" , "Spouse","Child","Domestic partner","Employee","Friend","Other Relative","Parents","Sibling" 3)When DOB is given for spouse, child etc , its uniqueness has been removed - not necessary to mark DOB field unique(Without uniqueness import is done successful) 4)For Trust","Business associate", and "Other" ,"Domestic partner","Employee","Friend","Other Relative","Parents","Sibling" - Date of birth is inserted in beneficiary page. 5)If spouse/child no exists in system - file wents to bad with proper error message("No such child/spouse exists") Working fine as expected Marking item state as ready for Production Thanks, Jayshree cc : Rakesh Roy Prasad Pise
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Local Testing [ 10200 ] Stage Testing [ 10201 ]
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: In Testing(10214) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Ready for Production(10217)
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) logged work - 28/Aug/17 01:08 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1.5h
               

              Stage testing

            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 25h [ 90000 ] 26.5h [ 95400 ]
            Worklog Id 74502 [ 74502 ]
            Hide
            Cindy.Wibbing Cindy Wibbing (Inactive) added a comment -

            Jayshree Nagpure Can you please check the attached.
            White Label BCC tried import but states it is not working. See comment from BCC
            Attached is the import file.

            "I have the group “Quincy” in stage, and I’ve created the import template “Bene Import” which has the birth date field mapped, but is not set up to be a unique field (so that it can be left null). I checked the Beneficiary form for the group, and Date of Birth is editable, and I can manually add a beneficiary with no Date of Birth. In the attached file (password via email), I get a server error when I try to import these records using the “Bene Import” function, but if I put fake dates of birth in the same records, they load with no problem."

            Show
            Cindy.Wibbing Cindy Wibbing (Inactive) added a comment - Jayshree Nagpure Can you please check the attached. White Label BCC tried import but states it is not working. See comment from BCC Attached is the import file. "I have the group “Quincy” in stage, and I’ve created the import template “Bene Import” which has the birth date field mapped, but is not set up to be a unique field (so that it can be left null). I checked the Beneficiary form for the group, and Date of Birth is editable, and I can manually add a beneficiary with no Date of Birth. In the attached file (password via email), I get a server error when I try to import these records using the “Bene Import” function, but if I put fake dates of birth in the same records, they load with no problem."
            Cindy.Wibbing Cindy Wibbing (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment QNI_5_Beneficiaries_2017-07-20.zip [ 60100 ]
            Hide
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) added a comment - - edited

            Hi Cindy Wibbing ,

            Please find below 3C's ,
            Concern : Import failed for Null Replacement character.
            Cause : This is because of failed to check for null replacement character.
            Correction: We have provided code fix and its will deployed on LB with deployment patch.
            Work around : Please remove date of birth field from template if not required or provide any default date value in import file.

            Thanks !

            Show
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) added a comment - - edited Hi Cindy Wibbing , Please find below 3C's , Concern : Import failed for Null Replacement character. Cause : This is because of failed to check for null replacement character. Correction : We have provided code fix and its will deployed on LB with deployment patch. Work around : Please remove date of birth field from template if not required or provide any default date value in import file. Thanks !
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) logged work - 29/Aug/17 01:52 PM
            • Time Spent:
              2h
               

              Rework on Null replacement character error.

            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 26.5h [ 95400 ] 28.5h [ 102600 ]
            Worklog Id 74899 [ 74899 ]
            khandu.kshirsagar Khandu Kshirsagar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Ready for Production(10217) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600)
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Stage Testing [ 10201 ] Reopen in Stage [ 10023 ]
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Reopen in Stage [ 10023 ] In Development [ 10007 ]
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Status In Development [ 10007 ] Local Testing [ 10200 ]
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210)
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) logged work - 01/Sep/17 02:45 PM
            • Time Spent:
              2h
               

              LB Testing

            Hide
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment -

            Verified on LB
            Company - Wheaton

            Verified below scenario for beneficiary import :
            1)Not given Date of birth in beneficiary template - Import is done successfully for "Trust","Business associate", and "Other" , "Spouse","Child","Domestic partner","Employee","Friend","Other Relative","Parents","Sibling"
            3)When DOB is given for spouse, child etc , its uniqueness has been removed - not necessary to mark DOB field unique(Without uniqueness import is done successful)
            4)For Trust","Business associate", and "Other" ,"Domestic partner","Employee","Friend","Other Relative","Parents","Sibling" - Date of birth is inserted in beneficiary page.
            5)If spouse/child no exists in system - file wents to bad with proper error message("No such child/spouse exists")
            6)When DOB is mapped but not given in File or given as "~" - Import done successfully
            7)For Unique DOB field - Import done successfullu
            8)For Uniquee DOB Field - DOB is blank(File wents to bad)

            Working fine as expected,
            Marking item state as Ready for stage

            Thanks,
            JAyshree

            cc : Rakesh Roy Prasad Pise

            Show
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment - Verified on LB Company - Wheaton Verified below scenario for beneficiary import : 1)Not given Date of birth in beneficiary template - Import is done successfully for "Trust","Business associate", and "Other" , "Spouse","Child","Domestic partner","Employee","Friend","Other Relative","Parents","Sibling" 3)When DOB is given for spouse, child etc , its uniqueness has been removed - not necessary to mark DOB field unique(Without uniqueness import is done successful) 4)For Trust","Business associate", and "Other" ,"Domestic partner","Employee","Friend","Other Relative","Parents","Sibling" - Date of birth is inserted in beneficiary page. 5)If spouse/child no exists in system - file wents to bad with proper error message("No such child/spouse exists") 6)When DOB is mapped but not given in File or given as "~" - Import done successfully 7)For Unique DOB field - Import done successfullu 8)For Uniquee DOB Field - DOB is blank(File wents to bad) Working fine as expected, Marking item state as Ready for stage Thanks, JAyshree cc : Rakesh Roy Prasad Pise
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213)
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 28.5h [ 102600 ] 30.5h [ 109800 ]
            Worklog Id 76506 [ 76506 ]
            khandu.kshirsagar Khandu Kshirsagar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602)
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: In Testing(10214)
            Hide
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment -

            Verified on Stage
            Company - Asml for hspl

            Verified below scenario for beneficiary import :
            1)Not given Date of birth in beneficiary template - Import is done successfully for "Trust","Business associate", and "Other" , "Spouse","Child","Domestic partner","Employee","Friend","Other Relative","Parents","Sibling"
            3)When DOB is given for spouse, child etc , its uniqueness has been removed - not necessary to mark DOB field unique(Without uniqueness import is done successful)
            4)For Trust","Business associate", and "Other" ,"Domestic partner","Employee","Friend","Other Relative","Parents","Sibling" - Date of birth is inserted in beneficiary page.
            5)If spouse/child no exists in system - file wents to bad with proper error message("No such child/spouse exists")
            6)When DOB is mapped but not given in File or given as "~" - Import done successfully
            7)For Unique DOB field - Import done successfully
            8)For Unique DOB Field - DOB is blank(File wents to bad)

            Marking item state as Ready for Production

            Thanks,
            Jayshree

            cc : Rakesh Roy Prasad Pise

            Show
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment - Verified on Stage Company - Asml for hspl Verified below scenario for beneficiary import : 1)Not given Date of birth in beneficiary template - Import is done successfully for "Trust","Business associate", and "Other" , "Spouse","Child","Domestic partner","Employee","Friend","Other Relative","Parents","Sibling" 3)When DOB is given for spouse, child etc , its uniqueness has been removed - not necessary to mark DOB field unique(Without uniqueness import is done successful) 4)For Trust","Business associate", and "Other" ,"Domestic partner","Employee","Friend","Other Relative","Parents","Sibling" - Date of birth is inserted in beneficiary page. 5)If spouse/child no exists in system - file wents to bad with proper error message("No such child/spouse exists") 6)When DOB is mapped but not given in File or given as "~" - Import done successfully 7)For Unique DOB field - Import done successfully 8)For Unique DOB Field - DOB is blank(File wents to bad) Marking item state as Ready for Production Thanks, Jayshree cc : Rakesh Roy Prasad Pise
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: In Testing(10214) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Ready for Production(10217)
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) logged work - 04/Sep/17 01:05 PM
            • Time Spent:
              2h
               

              Stage testing

            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 30.5h [ 109800 ] 32.5h [ 117000 ]
            Worklog Id 76703 [ 76703 ]
            khandu.kshirsagar Khandu Kshirsagar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Ready for Production(10217) Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: Production Deployed(10221)
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: Production Deployed(10221) Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: In Testing(10218)
            Hide
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment -

            Verified on Production
            Company - Asml for hspl

            Verified below scenario for beneficiary import :
            1)Not given Date of birth in beneficiary template - Import is done successfully for "Trust","Business associate", and "Other" , "Spouse","Child","Domestic partner","Employee","Friend","Other Relative","Parents","Sibling"
            3)When DOB is given for spouse, child etc , its uniqueness has been removed - not necessary to mark DOB field unique(Without uniqueness import is done successful)
            4)For Trust","Business associate", and "Other" ,"Domestic partner","Employee","Friend","Other Relative","Parents","Sibling" - Date of birth is inserted in beneficiary page.
            5)If spouse/child no exists in system - file wents to bad with proper error message("No such child/spouse exists")
            6)When DOB is mapped but not given in File or given as "~" - Import done successfully
            7)For Unique DOB field - Import done successfully
            8)For Unique DOB Field - DOB is blank(File wents to bad)

            Marking item state as Production complete

            Thanks,
            Jayshree

            Show
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment - Verified on Production Company - Asml for hspl Verified below scenario for beneficiary import : 1)Not given Date of birth in beneficiary template - Import is done successfully for "Trust","Business associate", and "Other" , "Spouse","Child","Domestic partner","Employee","Friend","Other Relative","Parents","Sibling" 3)When DOB is given for spouse, child etc , its uniqueness has been removed - not necessary to mark DOB field unique(Without uniqueness import is done successful) 4)For Trust","Business associate", and "Other" ,"Domestic partner","Employee","Friend","Other Relative","Parents","Sibling" - Date of birth is inserted in beneficiary page. 5)If spouse/child no exists in system - file wents to bad with proper error message("No such child/spouse exists") 6)When DOB is mapped but not given in File or given as "~" - Import done successfully 7)For Unique DOB field - Import done successfully 8)For Unique DOB Field - DOB is blank(File wents to bad) Marking item state as Production complete Thanks, Jayshree
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: In Testing(10218) Parent values: Production Complete(10222)Level 1 values: Closed(10223)
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Local Testing [ 10200 ] Stage Testing [ 10201 ]
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Stage Testing [ 10201 ] Production Testing [ 10202 ]
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) logged work - 06/Sep/17 01:34 PM
            • Time Spent:
              2h
               

              Production testing

            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Resolution Unresolved [ 10200 ] Fixed [ 1 ]
            Status Production Testing [ 10202 ] Production Complete [ 10028 ]
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 32.5h [ 117000 ] 34.5h [ 124200 ]
            Worklog Id 77145 [ 77145 ]
            Hide
            Cindy.Wibbing Cindy Wibbing (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Jayshree Nagpure
            Were you able to test with the attached zip file on Quincy in Stage?
            Just need to know so I can let BCC know whether we tested the file or not.
            Thanks!
            Cindy

            Show
            Cindy.Wibbing Cindy Wibbing (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Jayshree Nagpure Were you able to test with the attached zip file on Quincy in Stage? Just need to know so I can let BCC know whether we tested the file or not. Thanks! Cindy
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment QuincyImport.jpg [ 60870 ]
            Hide
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Cindy Wibbing,

            Yes, We tested the attached zip file on Quincy for hspl on stage.
            Import done successfully -
            Also verified on beneficiary page

            Thanks,
            Jayshree

            cc : Rakesh Roy Prasad Pise Vishal Bajad

            Show
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Cindy Wibbing , Yes, We tested the attached zip file on Quincy for hspl on stage. Import done successfully - Also verified on beneficiary page Thanks, Jayshree cc : Rakesh Roy Prasad Pise Vishal Bajad
            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) logged work - 25/Sep/17 01:21 PM
            • Time Spent:
              0.25h
               

              UI Refresh branch check-in.

            vishal.bajad Vishal Bajad (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 34.5h [ 124200 ] 34.75h [ 125100 ]
            Worklog Id 81133 [ 81133 ]
            satyap Satya made changes -
            Environment_New Stage [ 18443 ]
            Transition Time In Source Status Execution Times
            Vishal Bajad (Inactive) made transition -
            Open In Progress
            9h 34m 1
            Vishal Bajad (Inactive) made transition -
            In Progress Resolved
            21m 46s 1
            Amit Thorve (Inactive) made transition -
            Resolved Reopen
            5d 1h 32m 1
            Jaideep Vinchurkar (Inactive) made transition -
            Reopen In Development
            2d 15h 32m 1
            Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made transition -
            Stage Testing Reopened in Stage
            2d 5h 22m 2
            Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made transition -
            Reopened in Stage In Development
            1d 20h 28m 2
            Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made transition -
            In Development In LB Testing
            13d 13h 44m 3
            Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made transition -
            In LB Testing Stage Testing
            16d 14h 9m 3
            Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made transition -
            Stage Testing In Production Testing
            4s 1
            Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made transition -
            In Production Testing Production Complete
            8s 1

              People

              Assignee:
              jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
              Reporter:
              Cindy.Wibbing Cindy Wibbing (Inactive)
              Developer:
              Vishal Bajad (Inactive)
              QA:
              Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              7 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:
                Pre-Prod Due Date:
                Production Due Date:
                Code Review Date:

                  Time Tracking

                  Estimated:
                  Original Estimate - 10h Original Estimate - 10h
                  10h
                  Remaining:
                  Remaining Estimate - 0h
                  0h
                  Logged:
                  Time Spent - 34.75h
                  34.75h