Uploaded image for project: 'WORKTERRA'
  1. WORKTERRA
  2. WT-13061

Import - Allowed to import Org chart fields.

    Details

    • Type: Change Request
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: High
    • Resolution: Done
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: BenAdmin
    • Labels:
      None
    • Environment:
      Production
    • Module:
      BenAdmin - Import
    • Reported by:
      Client
    • Company:
      All Clients/Multiple Clients
    • Item State:
      Production Complete - Closed
    • Sprint:
      WT- Sprint 43
    • Severity:
      Medium

      Description

      System is not supporting to import Supervisor name and org chart fields. We need to add Or chart related fields on Import mapping.

        Attachments

        1. Analysis_document.doc
          20 kB
        2. FilesAffected.txt
          2 kB
        3. FinalUpdatedTestcases.xls
          36 kB
        4. Testcases.xls
          16 kB
        5. UpdatedTestcases.xls
          33 kB
        6. WT-13061_Scenarios(unit-testsing).xls
          9 kB

          Issue Links

            Activity

            Hide
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment - - edited

            Hi Amanulla Mulla,

            Attached are the testcase according to analysis doc provided by Suraj Sokasane.
            Let me know if any thing needed from my side.
            Also while testing if found some scenario's will update accordingly in test cases
            Testcases.xls
            cc - Hrishikesh Deshpande Prasad Pise Rakesh Roy Sachin Hingole Suraj Sokasane Jaideep Vinchurkar

            Show
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment - - edited Hi Amanulla Mulla , Attached are the testcase according to analysis doc provided by Suraj Sokasane . Let me know if any thing needed from my side. Also while testing if found some scenario's will update accordingly in test cases Testcases.xls cc - Hrishikesh Deshpande Prasad Pise Rakesh Roy Sachin Hingole Suraj Sokasane Jaideep Vinchurkar
            Hide
            Ganesh.sadawarte Ganesh Sadawarte (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Jennifer Reed,

            Please find attached Analysis_document.doc analysis document. We have come up with two approaches and we need to decide one of them. Let us know your preferred approach, if you want discuss this we can have call.

            CC-Vinayak Kulkarni,Satya,Samir,Gaurav Sodani

            Thanks,
            Ganesh

            Show
            Ganesh.sadawarte Ganesh Sadawarte (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Jennifer Reed , Please find attached Analysis_document.doc analysis document. We have come up with two approaches and we need to decide one of them. Let us know your preferred approach, if you want discuss this we can have call. CC- Vinayak Kulkarni , Satya , Samir , Gaurav Sodani Thanks, Ganesh
            Hide
            Ganesh.sadawarte Ganesh Sadawarte (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Jennifer Reed,

            As per our email communication, will go with approach 1 to implement this change.

            CC-Suraj Sokasane,Vinayak Kulkarni

            Thanks,
            Ganesh

            Show
            Ganesh.sadawarte Ganesh Sadawarte (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Jennifer Reed , As per our email communication, will go with approach 1 to implement this change. CC- Suraj Sokasane , Vinayak Kulkarni Thanks, Ganesh
            Hide
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hello Amanulla Mulla,

            Verified this on Lb
            Company - QA CAISO

            Verified scenario's are attached in test cases
            Some scenario's are not working are highlighted in testcases
            PFA - UpdatedTestcases.xls

            Re-opening this jira

            Thanks,
            Jayshree

            cc - Rakesh Roy Prasad Pise Sachin Hingole Hrishikesh Deshpande Jaideep Vinchurkar Suraj Sokasane Suraj Sokasane Ganesh Sadawarte

            Show
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment - Hello Amanulla Mulla , Verified this on Lb Company - QA CAISO Verified scenario's are attached in test cases Some scenario's are not working are highlighted in testcases PFA - UpdatedTestcases.xls Re-opening this jira Thanks, Jayshree cc - Rakesh Roy Prasad Pise Sachin Hingole Hrishikesh Deshpande Jaideep Vinchurkar Suraj Sokasane Suraj Sokasane Ganesh Sadawarte
            Hide
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Amanulla Mulla,

            Employment information supervisor field mapping is currently not used in import, This field should be removed

            Show
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Amanulla Mulla , Employment information supervisor field mapping is currently not used in import, This field should be removed
            Hide
            Ganesh.sadawarte Ganesh Sadawarte (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Jayshree Nagpure,

            Please find below details,

            1) Employment information supervisor field mapping is currently not used in import, This field should be removed:
            Comments: As of we are not removing this will consider this in import refactoring.

            2) File should kicked out to bad”Reuired field should not be blank or ~”:
            Comments: This is working as expected for other fields. Please refer below steps how IsRequired filed work.

            • If employee adding to system then required marked field must provide value.
            • If employee updating and required marked field has value in system but value not provide in file then it import successfully.
            • If employee updating and required marked field not has value in system and value not provide in file then it will to go bad file.

            3) To check supervisor SSN/ID uniquee
            Comments: Suraj Sokasane has already provided details on this. adding same in JIRA.
            Dependent Import has Composite key concept for unique fields. A composite key of all unique fields is created and used to check if dependent exist or not.
            Import does not support this functionality for Employee. Employee Import only supports uniqueness for either SSN or EmpID. If any other field is marked as unique, Import won't work.

            CC-Suraj Sokasane

            Thanks,
            Ganesh

            Show
            Ganesh.sadawarte Ganesh Sadawarte (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Jayshree Nagpure , Please find below details, 1) Employment information supervisor field mapping is currently not used in import, This field should be removed: Comments: As of we are not removing this will consider this in import refactoring. 2) File should kicked out to bad”Reuired field should not be blank or ~”: Comments: This is working as expected for other fields. Please refer below steps how IsRequired filed work. If employee adding to system then required marked field must provide value. If employee updating and required marked field has value in system but value not provide in file then it import successfully. If employee updating and required marked field not has value in system and value not provide in file then it will to go bad file. 3) To check supervisor SSN/ID uniquee Comments: Suraj Sokasane has already provided details on this. adding same in JIRA. Dependent Import has Composite key concept for unique fields. A composite key of all unique fields is created and used to check if dependent exist or not. Import does not support this functionality for Employee. Employee Import only supports uniqueness for either SSN or EmpID. If any other field is marked as unique, Import won't work. CC- Suraj Sokasane Thanks, Ganesh
            Hide
            amanulla.mulla Amanulla Mulla (Inactive) added a comment -

            Below are 3C's

            1.Concern: File wents to bad”Invalid numeric format” For -> To check supervisor ID with alpha numeric
            Cause : The data format for supervisor ID in system is numeric and for EMP ID is alpha numeric Thats why it wents to bad file
            Correction : We have handled this scenario by changing the data format for Supervisor EmpID at run time through the coding.

            2. Concern : successfully imported records not shown in org chart
            Cause : even though file went bad the update query was getting generated and replacing the successfully imported records.
            Correction : We have done currections so it will not generate the query for bad records and successfully imported records will show in org chart.

            Show
            amanulla.mulla Amanulla Mulla (Inactive) added a comment - Below are 3C's 1. Concern: File wents to bad”Invalid numeric format” For -> To check supervisor ID with alpha numeric Cause : The data format for supervisor ID in system is numeric and for EMP ID is alpha numeric Thats why it wents to bad file Correction : We have handled this scenario by changing the data format for Supervisor EmpID at run time through the coding. 2. Concern : successfully imported records not shown in org chart Cause : even though file went bad the update query was getting generated and replacing the successfully imported records. Correction : We have done currections so it will not generate the query for bad records and successfully imported records will show in org chart.
            Hide
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment -

            hello Amanulla Mulla,

            Verified on LB
            Company - QA CAISO

            Verified scenarios are attached in Latest updated Test-cases
            PFA FinalUpdatedTestcases.xls

            All scenarios are working fine

            Marking item state as Ready for Stage

            Thanks,
            Jayshree

            cc - Rakesh Roy Hrishikesh Deshpande Prasad Pise Ganesh Sadawarte

            Show
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment - hello Amanulla Mulla , Verified on LB Company - QA CAISO Verified scenarios are attached in Latest updated Test-cases PFA FinalUpdatedTestcases.xls All scenarios are working fine Marking item state as Ready for Stage Thanks, Jayshree cc - Rakesh Roy Hrishikesh Deshpande Prasad Pise Ganesh Sadawarte
            Hide
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment -

            Verified on Stage
            Company - ASML or hspl

            Verified all scenario of updated test-cases
            Working fine,

            Marking item state as Ready for Production

            Thanks,
            Jayshree

            Show
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment - Verified on Stage Company - ASML or hspl Verified all scenario of updated test-cases Working fine, Marking item state as Ready for Production Thanks, Jayshree
            Hide
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment -

            Verified on Production
            Company - Barrow for hspl

            Verified all scenario of updated test-cases
            Working fine,

            Marking item state as Production complete.

            Thanks,
            Jayshree

            Show
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment - Verified on Production Company - Barrow for hspl Verified all scenario of updated test-cases Working fine, Marking item state as Production complete. Thanks, Jayshree

              People

              Assignee:
              jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
              Reporter:
              hrishikesh.deshpande Hrishikesh Deshpande (Inactive)
              Account Executive:
              David Rhodes (Inactive)
              Developer:
              Amanulla Mulla (Inactive)
              QA:
              Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              4 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:
                Dev Due Date:
                Production Due Date:

                  Time Tracking

                  Estimated:
                  Original Estimate - 64h Original Estimate - 64h
                  64h
                  Remaining:
                  Remaining Estimate - 0h
                  0h
                  Logged:
                  Time Spent - 77h
                  77h