Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: High
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: BenAdmin
    • Labels:
      None
    • Environment:
      Production
    • Bug Severity:
      Medium
    • Module:
      BenAdmin - Enrollment
    • Reported by:
      Support
    • Company:
      Floyd
    • Item State:
      Production Complete

      Description

      Employee: Mindy Poss

      Admin approved her pending EOI for her STD. When it was approved it does not approve the sub plan.

      1. Please look into the data base and find out what sub plan she originally elected so we can fix her election

      2. Why is this an issue again. We had this corrected last fall and it was tested and confirmed.

        Attachments

        1. std 1.PNG
          std 1.PNG
          11 kB
        2. std 2.PNG
          std 2.PNG
          17 kB
        3. WT Stage - Issue Fixed.png
          WT Stage - Issue Fixed.png
          61 kB

          Issue Links

            Activity

            dkulling Debbie Kulling created issue -
            rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
            Field Original Value New Value
            Module Parent values: BenAdmin(10100) Parent values: BenAdmin(10100)Level 1 values: Enrollment(10107)
            sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment std 1.PNG [ 38625 ]
            sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment std 2.PNG [ 38626 ]
            Hide
            sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hello Jyoti Mayne,

            These are the below findings which we have observed,
            1. Currently system does not show the sub plan on View History as well as on Pending Queue.
            2. We have also checked the confirmation statement of an employee .( please check the screen shots)
            3. We have also gone through the STD plan >> sub plan it was required but not mandatory /even if we tried for Mandatory it was not working.
            4. For this we have referred to WT-187.

            Jyoti Mayne I kindly request you to please look into this issue.

            ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            CC:Mandar Kulkarni,Vijay Siddha,Satya

            Show
            sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) added a comment - Hello Jyoti Mayne , These are the below findings which we have observed, 1. Currently system does not show the sub plan on View History as well as on Pending Queue. 2. We have also checked the confirmation statement of an employee .( please check the screen shots) 3. We have also gone through the STD plan >> sub plan it was required but not mandatory /even if we tried for Mandatory it was not working. 4. For this we have referred to WT-187 . Jyoti Mayne I kindly request you to please look into this issue. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC: Mandar Kulkarni , Vijay Siddha , Satya
            sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Mandar Kulkarni [ mandark ] Jyoti Mayne [ jyoti.mayne ]
            sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 0h [ 0 ]
            Time Spent 2h [ 7200 ]
            Worklog Id 21675 [ 21675 ]
            sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Jyoti Mayne [ jyoti.mayne ] Sumeet.Kolge [ sumeet.kolge ]
            Status Open [ 1 ] In Progress [ 3 ]
            sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) logged work - 31/Jan/17 12:45 AM
            • Time Spent:
              2h
               
              <No comment>
            Hide
            sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) added a comment - - edited

            Hello Jyoti Mayne,

            These are the below findings :-
            1. We have checked this on new employee/existing employee
            2. Enrolled the STD & sub plan
            3.We can see pending status for STD on employee login.
            2. We can approve the plan from pending Que.
            3. The sub plan are showing in confirmation statement ( after approval.).
            4 .These are checked on production and stage both.

            Clients wants to know which plans was originally elected , please help us to find these record from back-end . Thank you.

            -------------------------------------------------

            CC:Mandar Kulkarni,Vijay Siddha

            Show
            sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) added a comment - - edited Hello Jyoti Mayne , These are the below findings :- 1. We have checked this on new employee/existing employee 2. Enrolled the STD & sub plan 3.We can see pending status for STD on employee login. 2. We can approve the plan from pending Que. 3. The sub plan are showing in confirmation statement ( after approval.). 4 .These are checked on production and stage both. Clients wants to know which plans was originally elected , please help us to find these record from back-end . Thank you. ------------------------------------------------- CC: Mandar Kulkarni , Vijay Siddha
            sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Sumeet.Kolge [ sumeet.kolge ] Jyoti Mayne [ jyoti.mayne ]
            sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) logged work - 31/Jan/17 11:49 AM
            • Time Spent:
              2.3h
               
              <No comment>
            sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 2h [ 7200 ] 4.3h [ 15480 ]
            Worklog Id 21986 [ 21986 ]
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) logged work - 31/Jan/17 01:44 PM
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               

              Discussion with Sumit

            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 4.3h [ 15480 ] 4.8h [ 17280 ]
            Worklog Id 22081 [ 22081 ]
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
            Assignee Jyoti Mayne [ jyoti.mayne ] Vinanti Yadav [ vinanti.yadav ]
            vinanti.yadav Vinanti Yadav (Inactive) logged work - 01/Feb/17 01:01 PM
            • Time Spent:
              2h
               

              analysis & discussion.

            vinanti.yadav Vinanti Yadav (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 4.8h [ 17280 ] 6.8h [ 24480 ]
            Worklog Id 22416 [ 22416 ]
            Hide
            dkulling Debbie Kulling added a comment -

            I need an update on this. Is there any way to find out how the employee was approved through the EOI and the subplan was not assigned

            Show
            dkulling Debbie Kulling added a comment - I need an update on this. Is there any way to find out how the employee was approved through the EOI and the subplan was not assigned
            Hide
            vinanti.yadav Vinanti Yadav (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Debbie Kulling,

            Please find below details:

            1. Please look into the data base and find out what sub plan she originally elected so we can fix her election

            We checked from back end and found that employee elected 7 Day Wait Sub Plan.

            2. Why is this an issue again. We had this corrected last fall and it was tested and confirmed.

            Concern: Sub Plan entry is not gets add after EOI approval.

            This is scenario specific issue

            Cause:

            • Employee did election with 1/1/17 effective date and pended for EOI.
            • Admin approved pending EOI with Effective date 02/01/2017 which not same as Election Effective date '01/01/2017' in this case sub plan is not getting approved.

            Correction: We are working on code fix and update you.

            Cc: Jyoti Mayne,Satya

            Thanks & Regards,
            Vinanti R. Yadav

            Show
            vinanti.yadav Vinanti Yadav (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Debbie Kulling , Please find below details: 1. Please look into the data base and find out what sub plan she originally elected so we can fix her election We checked from back end and found that employee elected 7 Day Wait Sub Plan. 2. Why is this an issue again. We had this corrected last fall and it was tested and confirmed. Concern: Sub Plan entry is not gets add after EOI approval. This is scenario specific issue Cause: Employee did election with 1/1/17 effective date and pended for EOI. Admin approved pending EOI with Effective date 02/01/2017 which not same as Election Effective date '01/01/2017' in this case sub plan is not getting approved. Correction: We are working on code fix and update you. Cc: Jyoti Mayne , Satya Thanks & Regards, Vinanti R. Yadav
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne logged work - 03/Feb/17 05:22 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1.5h
               

              scenario discussion with Vinanti and reviewed 3C's

            vinanti.yadav Vinanti Yadav (Inactive) logged work - 03/Feb/17 05:30 PM - edited
            • Time Spent:
              5h
               

              Analysis.
              Discussion.

            Hide
            dkulling Debbie Kulling added a comment -

            Please let me know the ETA on the code fix. Also we need to look at why you cannot see any history on sub plans or run and reports that include sub plans

            Show
            dkulling Debbie Kulling added a comment - Please let me know the ETA on the code fix. Also we need to look at why you cannot see any history on sub plans or run and reports that include sub plans
            vinanti.yadav Vinanti Yadav (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 6.8h [ 24480 ] 11.8h [ 42480 ]
            Worklog Id 23077 [ 23077 ]
            vinanti.yadav Vinanti Yadav (Inactive) made changes -
            Original Estimate 24h [ 86400 ]
            vinanti.yadav Vinanti Yadav (Inactive) made changes -
            Worklog Id 23077 [ 23077 ]
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
            Issue Type Support Activity [ 10301 ] Bug [ 1 ]
            Status In Progress [ 3 ] In Development [ 10007 ]
            Support Task Type Customization [ 11204 ]
            Workflow WT_Support [ 31443 ] WT_Defects [ 32113 ]
            Hide
            vinanti.yadav Vinanti Yadav (Inactive) added a comment - - edited

            Hi Debbie Kulling,

            • We needs 7 hr to fix this issue along with unit testing.
            • Currently system is not showing history of sub plans.
            • Sub plans are not include in reports .

            Thanks & Regards,
            Vinanti R. Yadav

            CC :Jyoti Mayne

            Show
            vinanti.yadav Vinanti Yadav (Inactive) added a comment - - edited Hi Debbie Kulling , We needs 7 hr to fix this issue along with unit testing. Currently system is not showing history of sub plans. Sub plans are not include in reports . Thanks & Regards, Vinanti R. Yadav CC : Jyoti Mayne
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
            Time Spent 11.8h [ 42480 ] 13.3h [ 47880 ]
            Worklog Id 23402 [ 23402 ]
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne logged work - 08/Feb/17 05:33 PM - edited
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               

              scenario discussion with Vinanti

            vinanti.yadav Vinanti Yadav (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Progress(10206)
            vinanti.yadav Vinanti Yadav (Inactive) logged work - 10/Feb/17 12:42 PM - edited
            • Time Spent:
              6.5h
               

              Coding

            vinanti.yadav Vinanti Yadav (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 13.3h [ 47880 ] 20.8h [ 74880 ]
            Worklog Id 24363 [ 24363 ]
            vinanti.yadav Vinanti Yadav (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 0h [ 0 ] 1h [ 3600 ]
            Time Spent 20.8h [ 74880 ] 19.8h [ 71280 ]
            Worklog Id 24363 [ 24363 ]
            satyap Satya made changes -
            Dev Due Date 13/Feb/2017
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 1h [ 3600 ] 0.75h [ 2700 ]
            Time Spent 19.8h [ 71280 ] 20.05h [ 72180 ]
            Worklog Id 24512 [ 24512 ]
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 0.75h [ 2700 ] 0.5h [ 1800 ]
            Time Spent 20.05h [ 72180 ] 20.3h [ 73080 ]
            Worklog Id 24512 [ 24512 ]
            vinanti.yadav Vinanti Yadav (Inactive) made changes -
            Code Review Date 13/Feb/2017
            Code Reviewed By Jyoti Mayne [ 11910 ]
            Developer Vinanti Yadav [ vinanti.yadav ]
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Progress(10206) Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Local Testing(10209)
            vinanti.yadav Vinanti Yadav (Inactive) logged work - 13/Feb/17 11:01 AM
            • Time Spent:
              2h
               

              Unit testing + Code review .

            vinanti.yadav Vinanti Yadav (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 0.5h [ 1800 ] 0h [ 0 ]
            Time Spent 20.3h [ 73080 ] 22.3h [ 80280 ]
            Worklog Id 24566 [ 24566 ]
            Hide
            vinanti.yadav Vinanti Yadav (Inactive) added a comment -

            @QA : Impacted area
            Check whether sub plan is getting added after EOI approval for
            1. select single sub plan
            2. select multiples sub plans
            for current and future enrollments.

            CC: Jyoti Mayne

            Show
            vinanti.yadav Vinanti Yadav (Inactive) added a comment - @QA : Impacted area Check whether sub plan is getting added after EOI approval for 1. select single sub plan 2. select multiples sub plans for current and future enrollments. CC: Jyoti Mayne
            ashwin.wankhede Ashwin Wankhede (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Local Testing(10209) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600)
            vinanti.yadav Vinanti Yadav (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Vinanti Yadav [ vinanti.yadav ] Prasad Pise [ prasadp ]
            prasadp Prasad Pise (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Prasad Pise [ prasadp ] Alankar Chavan [ alankar.chavan ]
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne logged work - 13/Feb/17 03:38 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1h
               

              code review and unit and scenario testing

            Hide
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) added a comment -

            currently can not start testing this on WT Stage due to an open issue at enrollment screen WT-8435

            Show
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) added a comment - currently can not start testing this on WT Stage due to an open issue at enrollment screen WT-8435
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made changes -
            Link This issue is blocked by WT-8435 [ WT-8435 ]
            Hide
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) added a comment - - edited

            Hello All,

            This is tested on WT Stage - working well - 15th Feb 2017

            We tried out various scenarios -

            • employee enrolled in STD plan - admin accepted the EOI request with same eff date as that of the enrollment
            • employee enrolled in STD plan - admin accepted the EOI request with different eff date as that of the enrollment
            • above scenarios tested with and without admin approval
            • above scenarios tested with and without GI situations

            In all the cases - system showed the correct name of the enrolled sub plan on confirmation statement

            Please refer attached screenshot (WT Stage - Issue Fixed)

            This is ready for Stage

            CC - Prasad Pise Rakesh Roy Jyoti Mayne

            Show
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) added a comment - - edited Hello All, This is tested on WT Stage - working well - 15th Feb 2017 We tried out various scenarios - employee enrolled in STD plan - admin accepted the EOI request with same eff date as that of the enrollment employee enrolled in STD plan - admin accepted the EOI request with different eff date as that of the enrollment above scenarios tested with and without admin approval above scenarios tested with and without GI situations In all the cases - system showed the correct name of the enrolled sub plan on confirmation statement Please refer attached screenshot (WT Stage - Issue Fixed) This is ready for Stage CC - Prasad Pise Rakesh Roy Jyoti Mayne
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213)
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made changes -
            Attachment WT Stage - Issue Fixed.png [ 39783 ]
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) logged work - 15/Feb/17 12:51 PM
            • Time Spent:
              4h
               

              WT Stage Testing
              Ready for Stage

            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 22.3h [ 80280 ] 26.3h [ 94680 ]
            Worklog Id 25222 [ 25222 ]
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
            Time Spent 26.3h [ 94680 ] 27.3h [ 98280 ]
            Worklog Id 25683 [ 25683 ]
            prasadp Prasad Pise (Inactive) made changes -
            Status In Development [ 10007 ] Local Testing [ 10200 ]
            khandu.kshirsagar Khandu Kshirsagar (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602)
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Local Testing [ 10200 ] Stage Testing [ 10201 ]
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Ready for Production(10217)
            Hide
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) added a comment -

            This is tested on Stage (scenarios are mentioned in above comments)

            Ready for Production

            CC - Rakesh Roy Prasad Pise Jyoti Mayne Vinanti Yadav

            Show
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) added a comment - This is tested on Stage (scenarios are mentioned in above comments) Ready for Production CC - Rakesh Roy Prasad Pise Jyoti Mayne Vinanti Yadav
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) logged work - 17/Feb/17 01:49 PM
            • Time Spent:
              2h
               

              stage testing

            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 27.3h [ 98280 ] 29.3h [ 105480 ]
            Worklog Id 25929 [ 25929 ]
            ashwin.wankhede Ashwin Wankhede (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Ready for Production(10217) Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: Production Deployed(10221)
            rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Stage Testing [ 10201 ] Production Testing [ 10202 ]
            Hide
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hello Debbie Kulling,

            This issue us deployed and tested on Production. Scenarios tested are mentioned in earlier comments.
            System shows the correct sub plan name (which is accepted from Pending EOI) along with it's correct coverage and related costs on Confirmation Statements.

            You may review this at your end and close the JIRA if it;s working as per the expectations.

            CC - Jyoti Mayne Vinanti Yadav Prasad Pise Rakesh Roy Hrishikesh Deshpande Sachin Hingole

            Show
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) added a comment - Hello Debbie Kulling , This issue us deployed and tested on Production. Scenarios tested are mentioned in earlier comments. System shows the correct sub plan name (which is accepted from Pending EOI) along with it's correct coverage and related costs on Confirmation Statements. You may review this at your end and close the JIRA if it;s working as per the expectations. CC - Jyoti Mayne Vinanti Yadav Prasad Pise Rakesh Roy Hrishikesh Deshpande Sachin Hingole
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: Production Deployed(10221) Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: In Testing(10218)
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: In Testing(10218) Parent values: Production Complete(10222)
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) logged work - 21/Feb/17 01:24 PM
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               

              prod testing

            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Alankar Chavan [ alankar.chavan ] Debbie Kulling [ dkulling ]
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 29.3h [ 105480 ] 29.8h [ 107280 ]
            Worklog Id 26396 [ 26396 ]
            rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
            Resolution Fixed [ 1 ]
            Status Production Testing [ 10202 ] Production Complete [ 10028 ]
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
            Link This issue relates to WT-8810 [ WT-8810 ]
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
            Link This issue relates to WT-8809 [ WT-8809 ]
            rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
            Bug Severity Medium [ 16702 ]
            Code Review Date 13/Feb/2017 13/Feb/2017
            Dev Due Date 13/Feb/2017 13/Feb/2017
            satyap Satya made changes -
            Environment_New Production [ 18442 ]
            dkulling Debbie Kulling made changes -
            Resolution Done [ 10000 ]
            Status Production Complete [ 10028 ] Closed [ 6 ]
            Transition Time In Source Status Execution Times
            Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made transition -
            Open In Progress
            2d 17h 52m 1
            Jyoti Mayne made transition -
            In Progress In Development
            6d 22h 19m 1
            Prasad Pise (Inactive) made transition -
            In Development In LB Testing
            10d 15h 5m 1
            Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made transition -
            In LB Testing Stage Testing
            8h 52m 1
            Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made transition -
            Stage Testing In Production Testing
            3d 19h 34m 1
            Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made transition -
            In Production Testing Production Complete
            12d 22h 55m 1
            Debbie Kulling made transition -
            Production Complete Closed
            357d 15h 1m 1

              People

              Assignee:
              dkulling Debbie Kulling
              Reporter:
              dkulling Debbie Kulling
              Account Executive:
              Debbie Kulling
              Developer:
              Vinanti Yadav (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              4 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Dev Due Date:
                Code Review Date:

                  Time Tracking

                  Estimated:
                  Original Estimate - 24h Original Estimate - 24h
                  24h
                  Remaining:
                  Remaining Estimate - 0h
                  0h
                  Logged:
                  Time Spent - 29.8h
                  29.8h