Uploaded image for project: 'WORKTERRA'
  1. WORKTERRA
  2. WT-8165

WT -> Terminate plan elections -> not terminating the plans according to the termination date rules set at plan / level

    Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: High
    • Resolution: Done
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: BenAdmin
    • Labels:
      None
    • Environment:
      Production
    • Bug Severity:
      Medium
    • Module:
      BenAdmin - Enrollment
    • Reported by:
      Harbinger
    • Item State:
      Production Complete - Closed

      Description

      Softchoice
      JE DUNN

      • plan level / company level termination date rule is set as end of current pay period (or anything like end of month)
      • take an existing employee who is currently enrolled in above plans
      • go on terminate plan election screen and put a termination date - save
      • ideally plan termination date should set according to the termination date rule set at plan level if not then at company level
      • here the termination date which you are putting is getting set as the final termination date for the plans
      • when the same termination scenarios is tested with class change - plans got terminated according to the termination date rule set at plan level if not then at company level

      CC - Prasad Pise Rakesh Roy Jyoti Mayne Amruta Lohiya Hrishikesh Deshpande Sachin Hingole

      Note - on Stage - same issue exists
      on LB - the termination date is not according to the plan as well as company level termination date rule

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) created issue -
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made changes -
            Field Original Value New Value
            Summary Wt -> Terminate plan elections -> not terminating the plans according to the termination date rules set at plan / level WT -> Terminate plan elections -> not terminating the plans according to the termination date rules set at plan / level
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made changes -
            Link This issue relates to WT-7125 [ WT-7125 ]
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made changes -
            Description Softchoice
            JE DUNN

            * plan level / company level termination date rule is set as end of current pay period (or anything like end of month)
            * take an existing employee who is currently enrolled in above plans
            * go on terminate plan election screen and put a termination date - save

            - ideally plan termination date should set according to the termination date rule set at plan level if not then at company level
            - here the termination date which you are putting is getting set as the final termination date for the plans

            - when the same termination scenarios is tested with class change - plans got terminated according to the termination date rule set at plan level if not then at company level

            CC - [~prasadp] [~rakeshr] [~jyoti.mayne] [~amruta.lohiya] [~hrishikesh.deshpande] [~sachin.hingole]
            Softchoice
            JE DUNN

            * plan level / company level termination date rule is set as end of current pay period (or anything like end of month)
            * take an existing employee who is currently enrolled in above plans
            * go on terminate plan election screen and put a termination date - save

            - ideally plan termination date should set according to the termination date rule set at plan level if not then at company level
            - here the termination date which you are putting is getting set as the final termination date for the plans

            - when the same termination scenarios is tested with class change - plans got terminated according to the termination date rule set at plan level if not then at company level

            CC - [~prasadp] [~rakeshr] [~jyoti.mayne] [~amruta.lohiya] [~hrishikesh.deshpande] [~sachin.hingole]


            Note - This works well on LB and Stage
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made changes -
            Description Softchoice
            JE DUNN

            * plan level / company level termination date rule is set as end of current pay period (or anything like end of month)
            * take an existing employee who is currently enrolled in above plans
            * go on terminate plan election screen and put a termination date - save

            - ideally plan termination date should set according to the termination date rule set at plan level if not then at company level
            - here the termination date which you are putting is getting set as the final termination date for the plans

            - when the same termination scenarios is tested with class change - plans got terminated according to the termination date rule set at plan level if not then at company level

            CC - [~prasadp] [~rakeshr] [~jyoti.mayne] [~amruta.lohiya] [~hrishikesh.deshpande] [~sachin.hingole]


            Note - This works well on LB and Stage
            Softchoice
            JE DUNN

            * plan level / company level termination date rule is set as end of current pay period (or anything like end of month)
            * take an existing employee who is currently enrolled in above plans
            * go on terminate plan election screen and put a termination date - save

            - ideally plan termination date should set according to the termination date rule set at plan level if not then at company level
            - here the termination date which you are putting is getting set as the final termination date for the plans

            - when the same termination scenarios is tested with class change - plans got terminated according to the termination date rule set at plan level if not then at company level

            CC - [~prasadp] [~rakeshr] [~jyoti.mayne] [~amruta.lohiya] [~hrishikesh.deshpande] [~sachin.hingole]


            Note - on Stage - same issue exists
                       on LB - the termination date is not according to the plan as well as company level termination daet rule
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made changes -
            Description Softchoice
            JE DUNN

            * plan level / company level termination date rule is set as end of current pay period (or anything like end of month)
            * take an existing employee who is currently enrolled in above plans
            * go on terminate plan election screen and put a termination date - save

            - ideally plan termination date should set according to the termination date rule set at plan level if not then at company level
            - here the termination date which you are putting is getting set as the final termination date for the plans

            - when the same termination scenarios is tested with class change - plans got terminated according to the termination date rule set at plan level if not then at company level

            CC - [~prasadp] [~rakeshr] [~jyoti.mayne] [~amruta.lohiya] [~hrishikesh.deshpande] [~sachin.hingole]


            Note - on Stage - same issue exists
                       on LB - the termination date is not according to the plan as well as company level termination daet rule
            Softchoice
            JE DUNN

            * plan level / company level termination date rule is set as end of current pay period (or anything like end of month)
            * take an existing employee who is currently enrolled in above plans
            * go on terminate plan election screen and put a termination date - save

            - ideally plan termination date should set according to the termination date rule set at plan level if not then at company level
            - here the termination date which you are putting is getting set as the final termination date for the plans

            - when the same termination scenarios is tested with class change - plans got terminated according to the termination date rule set at plan level if not then at company level

            CC - [~prasadp] [~rakeshr] [~jyoti.mayne] [~amruta.lohiya] [~hrishikesh.deshpande] [~sachin.hingole]


            Note - on Stage - same issue exists
                       on LB - the termination date is not according to the plan as well as company level termination date rule
            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Open [ 1 ] In Development [ 10007 ]
            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Analysis(10204)
            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
            Developer Umesh Kadam [ umesh.kadam ]
            QA Alankar Chavan [ alankar.chavan ]
            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 10h [ 36000 ] 6h [ 21600 ]
            Time Spent 4h [ 14400 ]
            Worklog Id 22691 [ 22691 ]
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne logged work - 02/Feb/17 04:44 PM
            • Time Spent:
              0.25h
               

              scenario discussion with Umesh

            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) logged work - 02/Feb/17 05:30 PM
            • Time Spent:
              4h
               

              Analysis of an issue
              Tried to reproduce an issue in LB, STAGE and Prodcution
              Code commit verification
              Discussion with Alankar, Rashmita, Jyoti, Satya and Rakesh for further action item

            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
            Link This issue relates to WT-2437 [ WT-2437 ]
            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
            Link This issue relates to WR-51 [ WR-51 ]
            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
            Link This issue relates to WT-7637 [ WT-7637 ]
            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
            Link This issue relates to WT-8020 [ WT-8020 ]
            Hide
            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Alankar Chavan,

            As discussed, this issue is exists only in Production environment since WT-2437 is not yet deployed in Production.
            WT-2437 will be deployed to Production once its related issues will get resolved.

            Thanks and Regards,
            :: Umesh Kadam

            CC : Satya, Rakesh Roy Jyoti Mayne, Harshawardhan Phalake, Rashmita Dudhe

            Show
            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Alankar Chavan , As discussed, this issue is exists only in Production environment since WT-2437 is not yet deployed in Production. WT-2437 will be deployed to Production once its related issues will get resolved. Thanks and Regards, :: Umesh Kadam CC : Satya , Rakesh Roy Jyoti Mayne , Harshawardhan Phalake , Rashmita Dudhe
            harshawardhan Harshawardhan Phalake (Inactive) logged work - 06/Feb/17 01:56 PM
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               

              Discussion with Umesh

            harshawardhan Harshawardhan Phalake (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 6h [ 21600 ] 5.5h [ 19800 ]
            Time Spent 4h [ 14400 ] 4.5h [ 16200 ]
            Worklog Id 23309 [ 23309 ]
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 5.5h [ 19800 ] 5.25h [ 18900 ]
            Time Spent 4.5h [ 16200 ] 4.75h [ 17100 ]
            Worklog Id 23615 [ 23615 ]
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne logged work - 08/Feb/17 06:02 PM
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               

              code review and unit testing

            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne logged work - 08/Feb/17 06:02 PM
            • Time Spent:
              0.25h
               

              JIRA Update

            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Analysis(10204) Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Local Testing(10209)
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Local Testing(10209) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600)
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
            Assignee Umesh Kadam [ umesh.kadam ] Alankar Chavan [ alankar.chavan ]
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 5.25h [ 18900 ] 4.75h [ 17100 ]
            Time Spent 4.75h [ 17100 ] 5.25h [ 18900 ]
            Worklog Id 24525 [ 24525 ]
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 4.75h [ 17100 ] 4.5h [ 16200 ]
            Time Spent 5.25h [ 18900 ] 5.5h [ 19800 ]
            Worklog Id 24527 [ 24527 ]
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Alankar Chavan [ alankar.chavan ] Jayshree Nagpure [ jayshree.nagpure ]
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210)
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Status In Development [ 10007 ] Local Testing [ 10200 ]
            Hide
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi,

            We have verified this issue on LB on Caiso.
            Terminating the plan according to rule set in plan design.
            Working as expected.
            Hence updating item state as ready for stage.

            Thanks,
            Jayshree

            CC: Alankar Chavan Umesh Kadam Prasad Pise Rakesh Roy

            Show
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment - Hi, We have verified this issue on LB on Caiso. Terminating the plan according to rule set in plan design. Working as expected. Hence updating item state as ready for stage. Thanks, Jayshree CC: Alankar Chavan Umesh Kadam Prasad Pise Rakesh Roy
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210) Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213)
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) logged work - 13/Feb/17 01:20 PM
            • Time Spent:
              1h
               

              testing termination issues and helping Jayshree

            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 4.5h [ 16200 ] 3.5h [ 12600 ]
            Time Spent 5.5h [ 19800 ] 6.5h [ 23400 ]
            Worklog Id 24620 [ 24620 ]
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
            Item State Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602)
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: In Testing(10214)
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Local Testing [ 10200 ] Stage Testing [ 10201 ]
            Hide
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Umesh Kadam,

            We have verified this issue on stage on Caiso for hspl.
            Plan termination date sets according to the termination date rule set at plan level if not then at company level.
            Working as expected.
            Hence updating item state as ready for production.

            Thanks,
            Jayshree

            CC: Prasad Pise Rakesh Roy Jyoti Mayne Alankar Chavan

            Show
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Umesh Kadam , We have verified this issue on stage on Caiso for hspl. Plan termination date sets according to the termination date rule set at plan level if not then at company level. Working as expected. Hence updating item state as ready for production. Thanks, Jayshree CC: Prasad Pise Rakesh Roy Jyoti Mayne Alankar Chavan
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: In Testing(10214) Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Ready for Production(10217)
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Jayshree Nagpure [ jayshree.nagpure ] Alankar Chavan [ alankar.chavan ]
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Ready for Production(10217) Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: Production Deployed(10221)
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Stage Testing [ 10201 ] Production Testing [ 10202 ]
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made changes -
            Resolution Unresolved [ 10200 ]
            Status Production Testing [ 10202 ] Reopen in Production [ 10027 ]
            Hide
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) added a comment -

            Tested on Production - LONG for HSPL - 17th feb 2017
            NO calculated dates are shown in Actual termination Date Column
            Can not terminate the plans from Terminate Employee Elections

            CC - Jyoti Mayne Umesh Kadam Prasad Pise Jayshree Nagpure Rakesh Roy

            Show
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) added a comment - Tested on Production - LONG for HSPL - 17th feb 2017 NO calculated dates are shown in Actual termination Date Column Can not terminate the plans from Terminate Employee Elections CC - Jyoti Mayne Umesh Kadam Prasad Pise Jayshree Nagpure Rakesh Roy
            Hide
            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Alankar Chavan,

            It was affected due to deployment issue of WT-2437 and that has been resolved now. It is working fine as expected now. Please check and confirm.

            Thanks and Regards,
            :: Umesh Kadam

            CC : Jyoti Mayne, Rakesh Roy, Prasad Pise, Hrishikesh Deshpande, Jayshree Nagpure

            Show
            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Alankar Chavan , It was affected due to deployment issue of WT-2437 and that has been resolved now. It is working fine as expected now. Please check and confirm. Thanks and Regards, :: Umesh Kadam CC : Jyoti Mayne , Rakesh Roy , Prasad Pise , Hrishikesh Deshpande , Jayshree Nagpure
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Reopen in Production [ 10027 ] In Development [ 10007 ]
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made changes -
            Status In Development [ 10007 ] Local Testing [ 10200 ]
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Local Testing [ 10200 ] Stage Testing [ 10201 ]
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Stage Testing [ 10201 ] Production Testing [ 10202 ]
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: Production Deployed(10221) Parent values: Production Complete(10222)Level 1 values: Closed(10223)
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made changes -
            Resolution Unresolved [ 10200 ] Fixed [ 1 ]
            Status Production Testing [ 10202 ] Production Complete [ 10028 ]
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Production Complete [ 10028 ] Closed [ 6 ]
            Hide
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) added a comment -

            This is tested on Production - 17th Feb 2017
            Working well

            Plans are getting terminated according to the termination date rule set up at plan level - if not - then according to the termination date rule set up at company level

            CC - Rakesh Roy Prasad Pise Jyoti Mayne Jayshree Nagpure

            Show
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) added a comment - This is tested on Production - 17th Feb 2017 Working well Plans are getting terminated according to the termination date rule set up at plan level - if not - then according to the termination date rule set up at company level CC - Rakesh Roy Prasad Pise Jyoti Mayne Jayshree Nagpure
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) logged work - 17/Feb/17 01:49 PM
            • Time Spent:
              2h
               

              prod testing

            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 3.5h [ 12600 ] 1.5h [ 5400 ]
            Time Spent 6.5h [ 23400 ] 8.5h [ 30600 ]
            Worklog Id 25927 [ 25927 ]
            rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
            Bug Severity Medium [ 16702 ]
            satyap Satya made changes -
            Environment_New Production [ 18442 ]
            Transition Time In Source Status Execution Times
            Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made transition -
            Open In Development
            19h 47m 1
            Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made transition -
            In Production Testing Reopen in Production
            3s 1
            Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made transition -
            Reopen in Production In Development
            3h 29m 1
            Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made transition -
            In Development In LB Testing
            11d 3h 58m 2
            Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made transition -
            In LB Testing Stage Testing
            2d 3h 5m 2
            Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made transition -
            Stage Testing In Production Testing
            1d 19h 36m 2
            Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made transition -
            In Production Testing Production Complete
            18s 1
            Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made transition -
            Production Complete Closed
            3s 1

              People

              Assignee:
              alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive)
              Reporter:
              alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive)
              Developer:
              Umesh Kadam (Inactive)
              QA:
              Alankar Chavan (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              3 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:

                  Time Tracking

                  Estimated:
                  Original Estimate - 10h
                  10h
                  Remaining:
                  Time Spent - 8.5h Remaining Estimate - 1.5h
                  1.5h
                  Logged:
                  Time Spent - 8.5h Remaining Estimate - 1.5h
                  8.5h