Uploaded image for project: 'WORKTERRA'
  1. WORKTERRA
  2. WT-8412

TIBCO- Employee Enrollment on terminated plan

    Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: High
    • Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: BenAdmin
    • Labels:
    • Environment:
      Production
    • Module:
      BenAdmin - Enrollment
    • Reported by:
      Client
    • Company:
      TIBCO
    • Item State:
      Development - In Analysis

      Description

      We (Tibco) have an employee that went into the system to update the commuter benefit effective 3/1/17. The event appears to be correct, but when Patrick ran the billing invoice it appears the Vision plan reverted back to the plan that was in effect for 2016 and termed it out. This plan is no longer available for 2017. I have attached a print screen of the “view history” and the commuter event (see attached)

      What could possibly have caused this?

      I (Tibco) had to create an event for 1/1/2017 in order to add the 2017 vision base plan in his record.

        Attachments

        1. fomin.docx
          303 kB
          Michelle Parker
        2. screenshot-1.png
          413 kB
          Michelle Parker
        3. screenshot-2.png
          41 kB
          Janine Calendo
        4. screenshot-3.png
          42 kB
          Janine Calendo

          Activity

          michelle.parker Michelle Parker (Inactive) created issue -
          michelle.parker Michelle Parker (Inactive) made changes -
          Field Original Value New Value
          Attachment screenshot-1.png [ 39443 ]
          Hide
          michelle.parker Michelle Parker (Inactive) added a comment -

          Show
          michelle.parker Michelle Parker (Inactive) added a comment -
          Raywill Raymond Williams (Inactive) made changes -
          Assignee Raymond Williams [ raywill ]
          Raywill Raymond Williams (Inactive) made changes -
          BA’s Raymond Williams [ 14201 ]
          Hide
          Raywill Raymond Williams (Inactive) added a comment - - edited

          Hi Michelle Parker -

          Can you please advise which employee you're referring to? According to your screenshots there are two different employees, Anton Fomin and Justin Osborne.

          Ray

          Show
          Raywill Raymond Williams (Inactive) added a comment - - edited Hi Michelle Parker - Can you please advise which employee you're referring to? According to your screenshots there are two different employees, Anton Fomin and Justin Osborne. Ray
          Hide
          michelle.parker Michelle Parker (Inactive) added a comment -

          Raymond Williams Both were given as examples of the same issue.

          Show
          michelle.parker Michelle Parker (Inactive) added a comment - Raymond Williams Both were given as examples of the same issue.
          Raywill Raymond Williams (Inactive) made changes -
          Assignee Raymond Williams [ raywill ] Janine Calendo [ janine.calendo ]
          Hide
          janine.calendo Janine Calendo (Inactive) added a comment -

          There was a termination date of 12/31/2016 in the plan. it was change to "NULL," when services ran it re-enrolled the EE's.

          Janine

          Show
          janine.calendo Janine Calendo (Inactive) added a comment - There was a termination date of 12/31/2016 in the plan. it was change to "NULL," when services ran it re-enrolled the EE's. Janine
          janine.calendo Janine Calendo (Inactive) made changes -
          Assignee Janine Calendo [ janine.calendo ] Michelle Parker [ michelle.parker ]
          janine.calendo Janine Calendo (Inactive) made changes -
          Resolution Done [ 10000 ]
          Status To Do [ 10000 ] Done [ 10001 ]
          janine.calendo Janine Calendo (Inactive) made changes -
          BA’s Raymond Williams [ 14201 ] Janine Calendo [ 14202 ]
          michelle.parker Michelle Parker (Inactive) made changes -
          Resolution Done [ 10000 ]
          Status Done [ 10001 ] To Do [ 10000 ]
          Hide
          michelle.parker Michelle Parker (Inactive) added a comment -

          Janine Calendo how do I explain to client? Is it a system generated error? Can the issue be corrected so the records shows up in the way she is expecting it to?

          Show
          michelle.parker Michelle Parker (Inactive) added a comment - Janine Calendo how do I explain to client? Is it a system generated error? Can the issue be corrected so the records shows up in the way she is expecting it to?
          michelle.parker Michelle Parker (Inactive) made changes -
          Assignee Michelle Parker [ michelle.parker ] Janine Calendo [ janine.calendo ]
          janine.calendo Janine Calendo (Inactive) made changes -
          Attachment screenshot-2.png [ 39472 ]
          Hide
          janine.calendo Janine Calendo (Inactive) added a comment - - edited

          I cannot explain as to why the system made that change. These things happen at times with the system with no explanation. If further is needed that would be a question to DEV

          Show
          janine.calendo Janine Calendo (Inactive) added a comment - - edited I cannot explain as to why the system made that change. These things happen at times with the system with no explanation. If further is needed that would be a question to DEV
          janine.calendo Janine Calendo (Inactive) made changes -
          Assignee Janine Calendo [ janine.calendo ] Michelle Parker [ michelle.parker ]
          janine.calendo Janine Calendo (Inactive) made changes -
          Attachment screenshot-3.png [ 39473 ]
          Hide
          janine.calendo Janine Calendo (Inactive) added a comment -

          Show
          janine.calendo Janine Calendo (Inactive) added a comment -
          Hide
          michelle.parker Michelle Parker (Inactive) added a comment -

          Can you please provide additional explanation for the issue presented by the client?

          Show
          michelle.parker Michelle Parker (Inactive) added a comment - Can you please provide additional explanation for the issue presented by the client?
          michelle.parker Michelle Parker (Inactive) made changes -
          Assignee Michelle Parker [ michelle.parker ] Amit Thorve [ amitthorve ]
          Hide
          janine.calendo Janine Calendo (Inactive) added a comment -

          DEV - Satya Jenni and I are trying to figure out why this EE record has a termination on the vision plan. It looks like there was additional eligibility on the vision plan but not in 2017. The EE did just a QE which terminated the vision plan as never effective. Can you please help provide an explanation to the term?

          Janine

          cc: Michelle Parker Jennifer Johnson

          Show
          janine.calendo Janine Calendo (Inactive) added a comment - DEV - Satya Jenni and I are trying to figure out why this EE record has a termination on the vision plan. It looks like there was additional eligibility on the vision plan but not in 2017. The EE did just a QE which terminated the vision plan as never effective. Can you please help provide an explanation to the term? Janine cc: Michelle Parker Jennifer Johnson
          janine.calendo Janine Calendo (Inactive) made changes -
          Key CT-1009 WT-8412
          Project WORKTERRA-CT [ 10800 ] WORKTERRA [ 10000 ]
          Status To Do [ 10000 ] New Request [ 10029 ]
          Workflow CT: Task Management Workflow [ 32434 ] WT_Features [ 32533 ]
          janine.calendo Janine Calendo (Inactive) made changes -
          Assignee Amit Thorve [ amitthorve ] Satya [ ID10004 ]
          Hide
          satyap Satya added a comment -
          Show
          satyap Satya added a comment - Cc: Vijay Siddha Jyoti Mayne Rakesh Roy
          satyap Satya made changes -
          Assignee Satya [ ID10004 ] Mandar Kulkarni [ mandark ]
          jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
          Environment Production [ 10005 ]
          Issue Type Task [ 3 ] Support Activity [ 10301 ]
          Status New Request [ 10029 ] Open [ 1 ]
          Support Task Type Query Resolution [ 11205 ]
          Workflow WT_Features [ 32533 ] WT_Support [ 32547 ]
          Hide
          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) added a comment -

          Hello Jyoti Mayne

          As per our discussion,these are the below observations we have found :-

          1. VSP Vision plan is contingent on medicals plans in 2016.
          Medical contingent plans on VSP vision >>
          1.Cigna basic 90/70
          2.Cigna buy up 100/80
          3.Cigna CDHP
          4.Cigna plus 100/50

          2.VSP vision plan effective date is 1/1/2016 and termination date is 12/31/2016

          3.On 2/6/2017 4.59.59 pm termination date was set to "null" for vsp vision plan.(EE name- anton fomis) at the same time VSP Base Vision Plan was terminated

          4. In view history >> 2/6/2017 4.57.39 pm status got changed to" incomplete" to complete"

          5.Multiple selection allowed is set to "No"

          Also tried different scenarios for EE.

          (This was also reviewed by shubhankar and jaideep)

          Kind request to you to please look into this issue.Thank You!

          -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

          CC:Mandar Kulkarni,Vijay Siddha

          Show
          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) added a comment - Hello Jyoti Mayne As per our discussion,these are the below observations we have found :- 1. VSP Vision plan is contingent on medicals plans in 2016. Medical contingent plans on VSP vision >> 1.Cigna basic 90/70 2.Cigna buy up 100/80 3.Cigna CDHP 4.Cigna plus 100/50 2.VSP vision plan effective date is 1/1/2016 and termination date is 12/31/2016 3.On 2/6/2017 4.59.59 pm termination date was set to "null" for vsp vision plan.(EE name- anton fomis) at the same time VSP Base Vision Plan was terminated 4. In view history >> 2/6/2017 4.57.39 pm status got changed to" incomplete" to complete" 5.Multiple selection allowed is set to "No" Also tried different scenarios for EE. (This was also reviewed by shubhankar and jaideep) Kind request to you to please look into this issue.Thank You! ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC: Mandar Kulkarni , Vijay Siddha
          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made changes -
          Assignee Mandar Kulkarni [ mandark ] Jyoti Mayne [ jyoti.mayne ]
          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) logged work - 13/Feb/17 12:37 PM
          • Time Spent:
            3h
             

            analysed and discussed with team

          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) made changes -
          Remaining Estimate 0h [ 0 ]
          Time Spent 3h [ 10800 ]
          Worklog Id 24588 [ 24588 ]
          jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne logged work - 13/Feb/17 03:41 PM
          • Time Spent:
            0.25h
             

            scenario discussion with Sumeet

          Hide
          janine.calendo Janine Calendo (Inactive) added a comment -

          Thank you for the update, I will advise Michelle Parker to let the client know the reason.

          Janine

          cc:Jennifer Johnson

          Show
          janine.calendo Janine Calendo (Inactive) added a comment - Thank you for the update, I will advise Michelle Parker to let the client know the reason. Janine cc: Jennifer Johnson
          Hide
          jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne added a comment -

          Hi Janine Calendo,

          We are working on this and will update you once it is completed.

          Cc: Satya, Jaideep Vinchurkar, Michelle Parker

          Show
          jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne added a comment - Hi Janine Calendo , We are working on this and will update you once it is completed. Cc: Satya , Jaideep Vinchurkar , Michelle Parker
          Hide
          janine.calendo Janine Calendo (Inactive) added a comment -

          ok thank you

          Show
          janine.calendo Janine Calendo (Inactive) added a comment - ok thank you
          Hide
          dkulling Debbie Kulling added a comment -

          I need to get the client an answer. The system should not be going back to terminated plans and enforcing contingencies. Please advise asap

          Show
          dkulling Debbie Kulling added a comment - I need to get the client an answer. The system should not be going back to terminated plans and enforcing contingencies. Please advise asap
          Hide
          jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne added a comment - - edited

          Hi Debbie Kulling,

          Due to UND WT-8282 and WT-7785 priority issues, we couldn't work on this. We will update you once analysis is completed.

          Cc: Satya, Jaideep Vinchurkar

          Show
          jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne added a comment - - edited Hi Debbie Kulling , Due to UND WT-8282 and WT-7785 priority issues, we couldn't work on this. We will update you once analysis is completed. Cc: Satya , Jaideep Vinchurkar
          Hide
          dkulling Debbie Kulling added a comment -

          We could not wait anymore. I went into the terminated vision plan and removed the contingency. We need to find out they the system was looking at terminated plan contingencies. I need to get the 3Cs on this for the client asap

          Show
          dkulling Debbie Kulling added a comment - We could not wait anymore. I went into the terminated vision plan and removed the contingency. We need to find out they the system was looking at terminated plan contingencies. I need to get the 3Cs on this for the client asap
          jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
          Time Spent 3h [ 10800 ] 3.25h [ 11700 ]
          Worklog Id 25684 [ 25684 ]
          jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
          Assignee Jyoti Mayne [ jyoti.mayne ] Vinanti Yadav [ vinanti.yadav ]
          vinanti.yadav Vinanti Yadav (Inactive) made changes -
          Status Open [ 1 ] In Progress [ 3 ]
          Hide
          vinanti.yadav Vinanti Yadav (Inactive) added a comment -

          Hi Debbie Kulling,

          Please find below our analysis details below :

          Customization :

          Plan Name Plan Start Date Plan End date
          Plan A 01/01/2016 12/31/2016
          Plan B 01/01/2017 Ongoing

          Initially, employee had elections in Plan A and Plan B as below :

          Plan Name Election Effective Date Election Termination date
          Plan A 09/01/2016 12/31/2016
          Plan B 01/01/2017 NULL

          On employee data change with retro date; say 09/01/2016, election in Plan A has been changed as 09/01/2016 to NULL and terminated Plan B election with 08/31/2016 (similar to termed as never effective). Here system is not considering termination date of Plan A and changing its election with term date NULL.

          We will have code change so that system will consider termination date of a Plan A and will change its election as 09/01/2016 to 12/31/2016 only and will not affect election of Plan B.

          Thanks and Regards,
          Vinanti Yadav

          CC :Jyoti Mayne

          Show
          vinanti.yadav Vinanti Yadav (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Debbie Kulling , Please find below our analysis details below : Customization : Plan Name Plan Start Date Plan End date Plan A 01/01/2016 12/31/2016 Plan B 01/01/2017 Ongoing Initially, employee had elections in Plan A and Plan B as below : Plan Name Election Effective Date Election Termination date Plan A 09/01/2016 12/31/2016 Plan B 01/01/2017 NULL On employee data change with retro date; say 09/01/2016, election in Plan A has been changed as 09/01/2016 to NULL and terminated Plan B election with 08/31/2016 (similar to termed as never effective). Here system is not considering termination date of Plan A and changing its election with term date NULL. We will have code change so that system will consider termination date of a Plan A and will change its election as 09/01/2016 to 12/31/2016 only and will not affect election of Plan B. Thanks and Regards, Vinanti Yadav CC : Jyoti Mayne
          vinanti.yadav Vinanti Yadav (Inactive) logged work - 17/Feb/17 01:04 PM
          • Time Spent:
            6h
             

            Analysis.

          vinanti.yadav Vinanti Yadav (Inactive) made changes -
          Time Spent 3.25h [ 11700 ] 9.25h [ 33300 ]
          Worklog Id 25895 [ 25895 ]
          jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne logged work - 17/Feb/17 05:26 PM
          • Time Spent:
            1h
             

            scenario discussion with Vinanti

          jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
          Assignee Vinanti Yadav [ vinanti.yadav ] Umesh Kadam [ umesh.kadam ]
          rakeshr Rakesh Roy (Inactive) made changes -
          Module Parent values: BenAdmin(10100) Parent values: BenAdmin(10100)Level 1 values: Enrollment(10107)
          umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) logged work - 21/Feb/17 05:30 PM
          • Time Spent:
            1h
             

            Analysis

          umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
          Time Spent 9.25h [ 33300 ] 10.25h [ 36900 ]
          Worklog Id 26573 [ 26573 ]
          umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) logged work - 22/Feb/17 05:30 PM
          • Time Spent:
            4h
             

            Analysis of an issue
            Debugging in local
            Tries to reproduce and issue on employee data change in local

          umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
          Time Spent 10.25h [ 36900 ] 14.25h [ 51300 ]
          Worklog Id 27393 [ 27393 ]
          umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
          Issue Type Support Activity [ 10301 ] Bug [ 1 ]
          Status In Progress [ 3 ] In Development [ 10007 ]
          Support Task Type Query Resolution [ 11205 ]
          Workflow WT_Support [ 32547 ] WT_Defects [ 33529 ]
          umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
          Component/s BenAdmin [ 10000 ]
          Developer Umesh Kadam [ umesh.kadam ]
          Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Analysis(10204)
          Priority Medium [ 3 ] High [ 2 ]
          Original Estimate 0h [ 0 ]
          jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
          Time Spent 14.25h [ 51300 ] 15.25h [ 54900 ]
          Worklog Id 28260 [ 28260 ]
          Hide
          dkulling Debbie Kulling added a comment -

          The change was done by a retro QE. The QE was effective 1/5/2017 Can you please map out the change that is going to be made to correct this issue. I want to make sure it is not going to impact other things.

          Show
          dkulling Debbie Kulling added a comment - The change was done by a retro QE. The QE was effective 1/5/2017 Can you please map out the change that is going to be made to correct this issue. I want to make sure it is not going to impact other things.
          jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne logged work - 02/Mar/17 04:45 PM
          • Time Spent:
            1h
             

            discussion and reproducing issue with Umesh

          umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) logged work - 02/Mar/17 05:30 PM
          • Time Spent:
            3h
             

            Tried to reproduce issue
            Test case discussion with Jyoti and Rashmita

          Hide
          umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) added a comment -

          Hi Debbie Kulling,

          As you have removed contingency customization so this will not be occur in TIBCO.

          We are working on reproducing and fixing this issue. We will update you on this.

          Thanks and Regards,
          :: Umesh Kadam

          CC : Jyoti Mayne, Rashmita Dudhe

          Show
          umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Debbie Kulling , As you have removed contingency customization so this will not be occur in TIBCO. We are working on reproducing and fixing this issue. We will update you on this. Thanks and Regards, :: Umesh Kadam CC : Jyoti Mayne , Rashmita Dudhe
          umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
          Time Spent 15.25h [ 54900 ] 18.25h [ 65700 ]
          Worklog Id 28695 [ 28695 ]
          jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
          Time Spent 18.25h [ 65700 ] 19.25h [ 69300 ]
          Worklog Id 28701 [ 28701 ]
          Hide
          umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) added a comment -

          Hi Debbie Kulling,

          We have tried to reproduce mentioned issue but is not reproduced at our end. We tried the same scenarios happened with 'Anton Fomin' as below :

          • We added back same contingencies (which was removed later) on 'VSP Vision Plan' 2016 plan.
          • Before going through QE mode his status was incomplete.
          • Raised 'Commuter-Transit Benefit Updates' QE from employee login with date 2/6/2017
          • As per QE effective date rule, he got QE mode with 03/01/2017 effective date
          • Completed QE workflow from employee login by saving demographic page and enrolled in commuter plan.
          • After finishing QE mode, his status changed from 'Incomplete' to 'Complete' in system. As shown in screenshot this was the change which terminated 'VSP Base Vision Plan' election and reinstated election in 'VSP Vision Plan'.
          • But even after this change, his 'VSP Base Vision Plan' election didn't got 'Terminate as never effective' and also 2016 election didn't reinstated.

          We also tried all other possible scenarios that could trigger this issue e.g. changing employee data from partner and company admin login etc.but still it was not reproducible.

          Hi Prasad Pise, please help to reproduce this scenario and share details.

          Thanks and Regards,
          :: Umesh Kadam

          CC : Jyoti Mayne, Prasad Pise, Rashmita Dudhe, Alankar Chavan

          Show
          umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Debbie Kulling , We have tried to reproduce mentioned issue but is not reproduced at our end. We tried the same scenarios happened with 'Anton Fomin' as below : We added back same contingencies (which was removed later) on 'VSP Vision Plan' 2016 plan. Before going through QE mode his status was incomplete. Raised 'Commuter-Transit Benefit Updates' QE from employee login with date 2/6/2017 As per QE effective date rule, he got QE mode with 03/01/2017 effective date Completed QE workflow from employee login by saving demographic page and enrolled in commuter plan. After finishing QE mode, his status changed from 'Incomplete' to 'Complete' in system. As shown in screenshot this was the change which terminated 'VSP Base Vision Plan' election and reinstated election in 'VSP Vision Plan'. But even after this change, his 'VSP Base Vision Plan' election didn't got 'Terminate as never effective' and also 2016 election didn't reinstated. We also tried all other possible scenarios that could trigger this issue e.g. changing employee data from partner and company admin login etc.but still it was not reproducible. Hi Prasad Pise , please help to reproduce this scenario and share details. Thanks and Regards, :: Umesh Kadam CC : Jyoti Mayne , Prasad Pise , Rashmita Dudhe , Alankar Chavan
          umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
          Assignee Umesh Kadam [ umesh.kadam ] Prasad Pise [ prasadp ]
          jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne logged work - 03/Mar/17 04:55 PM
          • Time Spent:
            1.5h
             

            analysis and reproduce issue

          umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) logged work - 03/Mar/17 05:30 PM
          • Time Spent:
            8h
             

            Analysis for issue reproduction

          jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
          Time Spent 19.25h [ 69300 ] 20.75h [ 74700 ]
          Worklog Id 29067 [ 29067 ]
          prasadp Prasad Pise (Inactive) made changes -
          Assignee Prasad Pise [ prasadp ] Alankar Chavan [ alankar.chavan ]
          Hide
          prasadp Prasad Pise (Inactive) added a comment -

          HI Alankar,
          Could you please try to reproduce this issue and share your findings.

          Show
          prasadp Prasad Pise (Inactive) added a comment - HI Alankar, Could you please try to reproduce this issue and share your findings.
          umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
          Time Spent 20.75h [ 74700 ] 28.75h [ 103500 ]
          Worklog Id 29177 [ 29177 ]
          Hide
          alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) added a comment -

          We will give a try to reproduce this at our end. This is in progress

          Show
          alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) added a comment - We will give a try to reproduce this at our end. This is in progress
          alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made changes -
          Assignee Alankar Chavan [ alankar.chavan ] Jayshree Nagpure [ jayshree.nagpure ]
          Hide
          dkulling Debbie Kulling added a comment -

          Any update?

          Show
          dkulling Debbie Kulling added a comment - Any update?
          Hide
          jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment -

          Hi Debbie Kulling,

          We tried to reproduce mentioned issue but is not reproduced at our end.
          We tried same scenario as of 'Anton Fomin' as below:
          -We added back same contingencies(Which was removed) on 'VSP Vision plan 2016'
          -Raised 'BCC admin changed' QE event and enrolled in "VSP Vision plan 2016" from 09/01/2016 -set termination date as 12/31/2016
          -Raised 'Commuter-Transit Benefit Updates' QE and enrolled in "VSP Base Vision Plan" plan with date 01/01/2017 and set termination date as 08/31/2016
          -As per QE effective date rule, he got QE mode with 03/01/2017 effective date
          -Employee went through his QE enrollment modes - made few elections - made some EDS change.
          -After finishing QE mode, his status changed from 'Incomplete' to 'Complete' in system (shown in employee's history)
          -The 2016 election in VSP Vision plan 2016 remained active till 12/31/2016 - while his 2017 election in VSP Base Vision Plan remained ON from 01/01/2017

          Through all the actions performed above - we never observed the termination date set as NULL with employee's 2016 plan election.

          We will try to keep an eye on such scenarios in our daily testing - if we encounter with such scenario, we will notify the same with steps to reproduce the same

          Please do let us know in case of you need any further help on this.

          Thanks,
          Jayshree

          CC; Prasad Pise Rakesh Roy Alankar Chavan Jyoti Mayne Umesh Kadam Vinanti Yadav Sumeet.Kolge Satya

          Show
          jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Debbie Kulling , We tried to reproduce mentioned issue but is not reproduced at our end. We tried same scenario as of 'Anton Fomin' as below: -We added back same contingencies(Which was removed) on 'VSP Vision plan 2016' -Raised 'BCC admin changed' QE event and enrolled in "VSP Vision plan 2016" from 09/01/2016 -set termination date as 12/31/2016 -Raised 'Commuter-Transit Benefit Updates' QE and enrolled in "VSP Base Vision Plan" plan with date 01/01/2017 and set termination date as 08/31/2016 -As per QE effective date rule, he got QE mode with 03/01/2017 effective date -Employee went through his QE enrollment modes - made few elections - made some EDS change. -After finishing QE mode, his status changed from 'Incomplete' to 'Complete' in system (shown in employee's history) -The 2016 election in VSP Vision plan 2016 remained active till 12/31/2016 - while his 2017 election in VSP Base Vision Plan remained ON from 01/01/2017 Through all the actions performed above - we never observed the termination date set as NULL with employee's 2016 plan election. We will try to keep an eye on such scenarios in our daily testing - if we encounter with such scenario, we will notify the same with steps to reproduce the same Please do let us know in case of you need any further help on this. Thanks, Jayshree CC; Prasad Pise Rakesh Roy Alankar Chavan Jyoti Mayne Umesh Kadam Vinanti Yadav Sumeet.Kolge Satya
          jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
          Assignee Jayshree Nagpure [ jayshree.nagpure ] Debbie Kulling [ dkulling ]
          jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) logged work - 09/Mar/17 12:52 PM
          • Time Spent:
            6h
             

            Try to repro issue on Production, analysis, internal discussion

          jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) made changes -
          Time Spent 28.75h [ 103500 ] 34.75h [ 125100 ]
          Worklog Id 30024 [ 30024 ]
          alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) logged work - 09/Mar/17 01:15 PM - edited
          • Time Spent:
            1h
             

            analysis and help to Jayshree

          alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made changes -
          Time Spent 34.75h [ 125100 ] 35.75h [ 128700 ]
          Worklog Id 30058 [ 30058 ]
          alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made changes -
          Worklog Id 30058 [ 30058 ]
          Hide
          jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne added a comment -

          Hi Prasad Pise,

          This issue is not reproducing from dev and QA side. Please find QA update above and update JIRA status.

          Cc: Satya

          Show
          jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne added a comment - Hi Prasad Pise , This issue is not reproducing from dev and QA side. Please find QA update above and update JIRA status. Cc: Satya
          jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
          Assignee Debbie Kulling [ dkulling ] Jayshree Nagpure [ jayshree.nagpure ]
          prasadp Prasad Pise (Inactive) made changes -
          Resolution Cannot Reproduce [ 5 ]
          Status In Development [ 10007 ] Rejected [ 10004 ]
          satyap Satya made changes -
          Status Rejected [ 10004 ] Closed [ 6 ]
          satyap Satya made changes -
          Environment_New Production [ 18442 ]
          Transition Time In Source Status Execution Times
          Janine Calendo (Inactive) made transition -
          To Do Done
          3h 49m 1
          Michelle Parker (Inactive) made transition -
          Done To Do
          1h 9m 1
          Janine Calendo (Inactive) made transition -
          To Do New Request
          22h 5m 1
          Jyoti Mayne made transition -
          New Request Open
          2d 10h 54m 1
          Vinanti Yadav (Inactive) made transition -
          Open In Progress
          3d 20h 32m 1
          Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made transition -
          In Progress In Development
          11d 22h 8m 1
          Prasad Pise (Inactive) made transition -
          In Development Rejected
          36d 3h 48m 1
          Satya made transition -
          Rejected Closed
          77d 1h 5m 1

            People

            Assignee:
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
            Reporter:
            michelle.parker Michelle Parker (Inactive)
            Developer:
            Umesh Kadam (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            10 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              Due:
              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:

                Time Tracking

                Estimated:
                Original Estimate - 0h
                0h
                Remaining:
                Remaining Estimate - 0h
                0h
                Logged:
                Time Spent - 35.75h
                35.75h