Uploaded image for project: 'WORKTERRA'
  1. WORKTERRA
  2. WT-8412

TIBCO- Employee Enrollment on terminated plan

    Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: High
    • Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: BenAdmin
    • Labels:
    • Environment:
      Production
    • Module:
      BenAdmin - Enrollment
    • Reported by:
      Client
    • Company:
      TIBCO
    • Item State:
      Development - In Analysis

      Description

      We (Tibco) have an employee that went into the system to update the commuter benefit effective 3/1/17. The event appears to be correct, but when Patrick ran the billing invoice it appears the Vision plan reverted back to the plan that was in effect for 2016 and termed it out. This plan is no longer available for 2017. I have attached a print screen of the “view history” and the commuter event (see attached)

      What could possibly have caused this?

      I (Tibco) had to create an event for 1/1/2017 in order to add the 2017 vision base plan in his record.

        Attachments

        1. fomin.docx
          303 kB
        2. screenshot-1.png
          screenshot-1.png
          413 kB
        3. screenshot-2.png
          screenshot-2.png
          41 kB
        4. screenshot-3.png
          screenshot-3.png
          42 kB

          Activity

          Hide
          michelle.parker Michelle Parker (Inactive) added a comment -

          Show
          michelle.parker Michelle Parker (Inactive) added a comment -
          Hide
          Raywill Raymond Williams (Inactive) added a comment - - edited

          Hi Michelle Parker -

          Can you please advise which employee you're referring to? According to your screenshots there are two different employees, Anton Fomin and Justin Osborne.

          Ray

          Show
          Raywill Raymond Williams (Inactive) added a comment - - edited Hi Michelle Parker - Can you please advise which employee you're referring to? According to your screenshots there are two different employees, Anton Fomin and Justin Osborne. Ray
          Hide
          michelle.parker Michelle Parker (Inactive) added a comment -

          Raymond Williams Both were given as examples of the same issue.

          Show
          michelle.parker Michelle Parker (Inactive) added a comment - Raymond Williams Both were given as examples of the same issue.
          Hide
          janine.calendo Janine Calendo (Inactive) added a comment -

          There was a termination date of 12/31/2016 in the plan. it was change to "NULL," when services ran it re-enrolled the EE's.

          Janine

          Show
          janine.calendo Janine Calendo (Inactive) added a comment - There was a termination date of 12/31/2016 in the plan. it was change to "NULL," when services ran it re-enrolled the EE's. Janine
          Hide
          michelle.parker Michelle Parker (Inactive) added a comment -

          Janine Calendo how do I explain to client? Is it a system generated error? Can the issue be corrected so the records shows up in the way she is expecting it to?

          Show
          michelle.parker Michelle Parker (Inactive) added a comment - Janine Calendo how do I explain to client? Is it a system generated error? Can the issue be corrected so the records shows up in the way she is expecting it to?
          Hide
          janine.calendo Janine Calendo (Inactive) added a comment - - edited

          I cannot explain as to why the system made that change. These things happen at times with the system with no explanation. If further is needed that would be a question to DEV

          Show
          janine.calendo Janine Calendo (Inactive) added a comment - - edited I cannot explain as to why the system made that change. These things happen at times with the system with no explanation. If further is needed that would be a question to DEV
          Hide
          janine.calendo Janine Calendo (Inactive) added a comment -

          Show
          janine.calendo Janine Calendo (Inactive) added a comment -
          Hide
          michelle.parker Michelle Parker (Inactive) added a comment -

          Can you please provide additional explanation for the issue presented by the client?

          Show
          michelle.parker Michelle Parker (Inactive) added a comment - Can you please provide additional explanation for the issue presented by the client?
          Hide
          janine.calendo Janine Calendo (Inactive) added a comment -

          DEV - Satya Jenni and I are trying to figure out why this EE record has a termination on the vision plan. It looks like there was additional eligibility on the vision plan but not in 2017. The EE did just a QE which terminated the vision plan as never effective. Can you please help provide an explanation to the term?

          Janine

          cc: Michelle Parker Jennifer Johnson

          Show
          janine.calendo Janine Calendo (Inactive) added a comment - DEV - Satya Jenni and I are trying to figure out why this EE record has a termination on the vision plan. It looks like there was additional eligibility on the vision plan but not in 2017. The EE did just a QE which terminated the vision plan as never effective. Can you please help provide an explanation to the term? Janine cc: Michelle Parker Jennifer Johnson
          Hide
          satyap Satya added a comment -
          Show
          satyap Satya added a comment - Cc: Vijay Siddha Jyoti Mayne Rakesh Roy
          Hide
          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) added a comment -

          Hello Jyoti Mayne

          As per our discussion,these are the below observations we have found :-

          1. VSP Vision plan is contingent on medicals plans in 2016.
          Medical contingent plans on VSP vision >>
          1.Cigna basic 90/70
          2.Cigna buy up 100/80
          3.Cigna CDHP
          4.Cigna plus 100/50

          2.VSP vision plan effective date is 1/1/2016 and termination date is 12/31/2016

          3.On 2/6/2017 4.59.59 pm termination date was set to "null" for vsp vision plan.(EE name- anton fomis) at the same time VSP Base Vision Plan was terminated

          4. In view history >> 2/6/2017 4.57.39 pm status got changed to" incomplete" to complete"

          5.Multiple selection allowed is set to "No"

          Also tried different scenarios for EE.

          (This was also reviewed by shubhankar and jaideep)

          Kind request to you to please look into this issue.Thank You!

          -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

          CC:Mandar Kulkarni,Vijay Siddha

          Show
          sumeet.kolge Sumeet.Kolge (Inactive) added a comment - Hello Jyoti Mayne As per our discussion,these are the below observations we have found :- 1. VSP Vision plan is contingent on medicals plans in 2016. Medical contingent plans on VSP vision >> 1.Cigna basic 90/70 2.Cigna buy up 100/80 3.Cigna CDHP 4.Cigna plus 100/50 2.VSP vision plan effective date is 1/1/2016 and termination date is 12/31/2016 3.On 2/6/2017 4.59.59 pm termination date was set to "null" for vsp vision plan.(EE name- anton fomis) at the same time VSP Base Vision Plan was terminated 4. In view history >> 2/6/2017 4.57.39 pm status got changed to" incomplete" to complete" 5.Multiple selection allowed is set to "No" Also tried different scenarios for EE. (This was also reviewed by shubhankar and jaideep) Kind request to you to please look into this issue.Thank You! ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC: Mandar Kulkarni , Vijay Siddha
          Hide
          janine.calendo Janine Calendo (Inactive) added a comment -

          Thank you for the update, I will advise Michelle Parker to let the client know the reason.

          Janine

          cc:Jennifer Johnson

          Show
          janine.calendo Janine Calendo (Inactive) added a comment - Thank you for the update, I will advise Michelle Parker to let the client know the reason. Janine cc: Jennifer Johnson
          Hide
          jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne added a comment -

          Hi Janine Calendo,

          We are working on this and will update you once it is completed.

          Cc: Satya, Jaideep Vinchurkar, Michelle Parker

          Show
          jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne added a comment - Hi Janine Calendo , We are working on this and will update you once it is completed. Cc: Satya , Jaideep Vinchurkar , Michelle Parker
          Hide
          janine.calendo Janine Calendo (Inactive) added a comment -

          ok thank you

          Show
          janine.calendo Janine Calendo (Inactive) added a comment - ok thank you
          Hide
          dkulling Debbie Kulling added a comment -

          I need to get the client an answer. The system should not be going back to terminated plans and enforcing contingencies. Please advise asap

          Show
          dkulling Debbie Kulling added a comment - I need to get the client an answer. The system should not be going back to terminated plans and enforcing contingencies. Please advise asap
          Hide
          jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne added a comment - - edited

          Hi Debbie Kulling,

          Due to UND WT-8282 and WT-7785 priority issues, we couldn't work on this. We will update you once analysis is completed.

          Cc: Satya, Jaideep Vinchurkar

          Show
          jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne added a comment - - edited Hi Debbie Kulling , Due to UND WT-8282 and WT-7785 priority issues, we couldn't work on this. We will update you once analysis is completed. Cc: Satya , Jaideep Vinchurkar
          Hide
          dkulling Debbie Kulling added a comment -

          We could not wait anymore. I went into the terminated vision plan and removed the contingency. We need to find out they the system was looking at terminated plan contingencies. I need to get the 3Cs on this for the client asap

          Show
          dkulling Debbie Kulling added a comment - We could not wait anymore. I went into the terminated vision plan and removed the contingency. We need to find out they the system was looking at terminated plan contingencies. I need to get the 3Cs on this for the client asap
          Hide
          vinanti.yadav Vinanti Yadav (Inactive) added a comment -

          Hi Debbie Kulling,

          Please find below our analysis details below :

          Customization :

          Plan Name Plan Start Date Plan End date
          Plan A 01/01/2016 12/31/2016
          Plan B 01/01/2017 Ongoing

          Initially, employee had elections in Plan A and Plan B as below :

          Plan Name Election Effective Date Election Termination date
          Plan A 09/01/2016 12/31/2016
          Plan B 01/01/2017 NULL

          On employee data change with retro date; say 09/01/2016, election in Plan A has been changed as 09/01/2016 to NULL and terminated Plan B election with 08/31/2016 (similar to termed as never effective). Here system is not considering termination date of Plan A and changing its election with term date NULL.

          We will have code change so that system will consider termination date of a Plan A and will change its election as 09/01/2016 to 12/31/2016 only and will not affect election of Plan B.

          Thanks and Regards,
          Vinanti Yadav

          CC :Jyoti Mayne

          Show
          vinanti.yadav Vinanti Yadav (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Debbie Kulling , Please find below our analysis details below : Customization : Plan Name Plan Start Date Plan End date Plan A 01/01/2016 12/31/2016 Plan B 01/01/2017 Ongoing Initially, employee had elections in Plan A and Plan B as below : Plan Name Election Effective Date Election Termination date Plan A 09/01/2016 12/31/2016 Plan B 01/01/2017 NULL On employee data change with retro date; say 09/01/2016, election in Plan A has been changed as 09/01/2016 to NULL and terminated Plan B election with 08/31/2016 (similar to termed as never effective). Here system is not considering termination date of Plan A and changing its election with term date NULL. We will have code change so that system will consider termination date of a Plan A and will change its election as 09/01/2016 to 12/31/2016 only and will not affect election of Plan B. Thanks and Regards, Vinanti Yadav CC : Jyoti Mayne
          Hide
          dkulling Debbie Kulling added a comment -

          The change was done by a retro QE. The QE was effective 1/5/2017 Can you please map out the change that is going to be made to correct this issue. I want to make sure it is not going to impact other things.

          Show
          dkulling Debbie Kulling added a comment - The change was done by a retro QE. The QE was effective 1/5/2017 Can you please map out the change that is going to be made to correct this issue. I want to make sure it is not going to impact other things.
          Hide
          umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) added a comment -

          Hi Debbie Kulling,

          As you have removed contingency customization so this will not be occur in TIBCO.

          We are working on reproducing and fixing this issue. We will update you on this.

          Thanks and Regards,
          :: Umesh Kadam

          CC : Jyoti Mayne, Rashmita Dudhe

          Show
          umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Debbie Kulling , As you have removed contingency customization so this will not be occur in TIBCO. We are working on reproducing and fixing this issue. We will update you on this. Thanks and Regards, :: Umesh Kadam CC : Jyoti Mayne , Rashmita Dudhe
          Hide
          umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) added a comment -

          Hi Debbie Kulling,

          We have tried to reproduce mentioned issue but is not reproduced at our end. We tried the same scenarios happened with 'Anton Fomin' as below :

          • We added back same contingencies (which was removed later) on 'VSP Vision Plan' 2016 plan.
          • Before going through QE mode his status was incomplete.
          • Raised 'Commuter-Transit Benefit Updates' QE from employee login with date 2/6/2017
          • As per QE effective date rule, he got QE mode with 03/01/2017 effective date
          • Completed QE workflow from employee login by saving demographic page and enrolled in commuter plan.
          • After finishing QE mode, his status changed from 'Incomplete' to 'Complete' in system. As shown in screenshot this was the change which terminated 'VSP Base Vision Plan' election and reinstated election in 'VSP Vision Plan'.
          • But even after this change, his 'VSP Base Vision Plan' election didn't got 'Terminate as never effective' and also 2016 election didn't reinstated.

          We also tried all other possible scenarios that could trigger this issue e.g. changing employee data from partner and company admin login etc.but still it was not reproducible.

          Hi Prasad Pise, please help to reproduce this scenario and share details.

          Thanks and Regards,
          :: Umesh Kadam

          CC : Jyoti Mayne, Prasad Pise, Rashmita Dudhe, Alankar Chavan

          Show
          umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Debbie Kulling , We have tried to reproduce mentioned issue but is not reproduced at our end. We tried the same scenarios happened with 'Anton Fomin' as below : We added back same contingencies (which was removed later) on 'VSP Vision Plan' 2016 plan. Before going through QE mode his status was incomplete. Raised 'Commuter-Transit Benefit Updates' QE from employee login with date 2/6/2017 As per QE effective date rule, he got QE mode with 03/01/2017 effective date Completed QE workflow from employee login by saving demographic page and enrolled in commuter plan. After finishing QE mode, his status changed from 'Incomplete' to 'Complete' in system. As shown in screenshot this was the change which terminated 'VSP Base Vision Plan' election and reinstated election in 'VSP Vision Plan'. But even after this change, his 'VSP Base Vision Plan' election didn't got 'Terminate as never effective' and also 2016 election didn't reinstated. We also tried all other possible scenarios that could trigger this issue e.g. changing employee data from partner and company admin login etc.but still it was not reproducible. Hi Prasad Pise , please help to reproduce this scenario and share details. Thanks and Regards, :: Umesh Kadam CC : Jyoti Mayne , Prasad Pise , Rashmita Dudhe , Alankar Chavan
          Hide
          prasadp Prasad Pise (Inactive) added a comment -

          HI Alankar,
          Could you please try to reproduce this issue and share your findings.

          Show
          prasadp Prasad Pise (Inactive) added a comment - HI Alankar, Could you please try to reproduce this issue and share your findings.
          Hide
          alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) added a comment -

          We will give a try to reproduce this at our end. This is in progress

          Show
          alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) added a comment - We will give a try to reproduce this at our end. This is in progress
          Hide
          dkulling Debbie Kulling added a comment -

          Any update?

          Show
          dkulling Debbie Kulling added a comment - Any update?
          Hide
          jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment -

          Hi Debbie Kulling,

          We tried to reproduce mentioned issue but is not reproduced at our end.
          We tried same scenario as of 'Anton Fomin' as below:
          -We added back same contingencies(Which was removed) on 'VSP Vision plan 2016'
          -Raised 'BCC admin changed' QE event and enrolled in "VSP Vision plan 2016" from 09/01/2016 -set termination date as 12/31/2016
          -Raised 'Commuter-Transit Benefit Updates' QE and enrolled in "VSP Base Vision Plan" plan with date 01/01/2017 and set termination date as 08/31/2016
          -As per QE effective date rule, he got QE mode with 03/01/2017 effective date
          -Employee went through his QE enrollment modes - made few elections - made some EDS change.
          -After finishing QE mode, his status changed from 'Incomplete' to 'Complete' in system (shown in employee's history)
          -The 2016 election in VSP Vision plan 2016 remained active till 12/31/2016 - while his 2017 election in VSP Base Vision Plan remained ON from 01/01/2017

          Through all the actions performed above - we never observed the termination date set as NULL with employee's 2016 plan election.

          We will try to keep an eye on such scenarios in our daily testing - if we encounter with such scenario, we will notify the same with steps to reproduce the same

          Please do let us know in case of you need any further help on this.

          Thanks,
          Jayshree

          CC; Prasad Pise Rakesh Roy Alankar Chavan Jyoti Mayne Umesh Kadam Vinanti Yadav Sumeet.Kolge Satya

          Show
          jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Debbie Kulling , We tried to reproduce mentioned issue but is not reproduced at our end. We tried same scenario as of 'Anton Fomin' as below: -We added back same contingencies(Which was removed) on 'VSP Vision plan 2016' -Raised 'BCC admin changed' QE event and enrolled in "VSP Vision plan 2016" from 09/01/2016 -set termination date as 12/31/2016 -Raised 'Commuter-Transit Benefit Updates' QE and enrolled in "VSP Base Vision Plan" plan with date 01/01/2017 and set termination date as 08/31/2016 -As per QE effective date rule, he got QE mode with 03/01/2017 effective date -Employee went through his QE enrollment modes - made few elections - made some EDS change. -After finishing QE mode, his status changed from 'Incomplete' to 'Complete' in system (shown in employee's history) -The 2016 election in VSP Vision plan 2016 remained active till 12/31/2016 - while his 2017 election in VSP Base Vision Plan remained ON from 01/01/2017 Through all the actions performed above - we never observed the termination date set as NULL with employee's 2016 plan election. We will try to keep an eye on such scenarios in our daily testing - if we encounter with such scenario, we will notify the same with steps to reproduce the same Please do let us know in case of you need any further help on this. Thanks, Jayshree CC; Prasad Pise Rakesh Roy Alankar Chavan Jyoti Mayne Umesh Kadam Vinanti Yadav Sumeet.Kolge Satya
          Hide
          jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne added a comment -

          Hi Prasad Pise,

          This issue is not reproducing from dev and QA side. Please find QA update above and update JIRA status.

          Cc: Satya

          Show
          jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne added a comment - Hi Prasad Pise , This issue is not reproducing from dev and QA side. Please find QA update above and update JIRA status. Cc: Satya

            People

            Assignee:
            jayshree.nagpure Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
            Reporter:
            michelle.parker Michelle Parker (Inactive)
            Developer:
            Umesh Kadam (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            10 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              Due:
              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:

                Time Tracking

                Estimated:
                Original Estimate - 0h
                0h
                Remaining:
                Remaining Estimate - 0h
                0h
                Logged:
                Time Spent - 35.75h
                35.75h