-
Type:
Bug
-
Status: Closed
-
Priority:
High
-
Resolution: Done
-
Affects Version/s: None
-
Fix Version/s: None
-
Component/s: ACA
-
Labels:None
-
Environment:Production
-
Bug Severity:Low
-
Module:ACA
-
Reported by:Client
-
Item State:Production Complete - Closed
Step:-
1.Add employee
2.Employee enrolled into medical plan 01/01/2017
3.Employee terminated from same plan 01/27/2017
4.Now again he enrolled into same plan 01/28/2017
Actual - He getting sum of cost
Expected - Application should pull latest cost
Please see attached screen shot for more info -
Henry Bell -XXXX74657
Plan Name - HIGHMARK PPO 90
EE cost - $324.54 and ER cost - $1,098.98 on file
Expected - EE cost - $172.60 and ER cost - $491.27 on file
James Wills - XXXX91974
Plan Name - HIGHMARK PPO 90
EE cost - $883.09 and ER cost - $1,385.41 on file
Expected - EE cost - $486.76 and ER cost - $1,385.41 on file
Testing of this issue is blocked due to WT-8894
Smita Pawar (Inactive)
added a comment - Testing of this issue is blocked due to WT-8894 Smita Pawar Please check this on stage .
We have verified above mentioned issue on Stage [ACA Automation] company.
Tested scenario as follows.
1.EE enrolled in plan with EE from 01/01/2017 with EE & ER cost as $240 & $410 and on 01/15/2017 tier changed to EE+SP with
EE & ER cost as $250 & $420. On file only latest cost displayed. PFA screen shot additional information.
2. Checked whether after waiving the election coverage is reflecting correctly.
3.But if you raise more than one qualifying event, then event date is not reflecting correctly.
Smita Pawar (Inactive)
added a comment - - edited We have verified above mentioned issue on Stage [ACA Automation] company.
Tested scenario as follows.
1.EE enrolled in plan with EE from 01/01/2017 with EE & ER cost as $240 & $410 and on 01/15/2017 tier changed to EE+SP with
EE & ER cost as $250 & $420. On file only latest cost displayed. PFA screen shot additional information.
2. Checked whether after waiving the election coverage is reflecting correctly.
3.But if you raise more than one qualifying event, then event date is not reflecting correctly. We will discuss scenario 3 in person
Smita Pawar (Inactive)
added a comment - Revansiddha Gaur ,
We will discuss scenario 3 in person Smita Pawar Is this still in testing and What's production ETA?
Sachin Hingole
Hi @ Reven,
Let me know, when we can discuss about point 3
Thanks
Smita Pawar (Inactive)
added a comment - Hi @ Reven,
Let me know, when we can discuss about point 3
Thanks As discussed we are considering latest event date so this problem will not occur again.
Smita Pawar (Inactive)
added a comment - As discussed we are considering latest event date so this problem will not occur again. Testing is blocked due to WT-10081 and its other related issues
Smita Pawar (Inactive)
added a comment - Testing is blocked due to WT-10081 and its other related issues We have verified above mentioned issue on Production [Metso for Hspl] company.
Its working fine. PFA screen shot for additional information.
Thanks
Smita Pawar (Inactive)
added a comment - We have verified above mentioned issue on Production [Metso for Hspl] company.
Its working fine. PFA screen shot for additional information.
Thanks 
Hi,
CONCERN: Showing cost double.
CAUSE : In same month there are two enrollments. & calculating it by summing up of both two enrollments.
CORRECTION : Corrected it to refer only last enrollment rate.
Regards,
Revan
Smita Pawar Mahendra Mungase Sachin Hingole Kumar Chhajed Nandkumar Prabhakar Karlekar