WORKTERRAProject Type: software

WORKTERRA

Uploaded image for project: 'WORKTERRA'
  1. WORKTERRA
  2. WT-9636

WT -> Spouse Child Enrollment Allowed -> EOI Rejection problem

    Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Rejected
    • Priority: High
    • Resolution: System Behaviour
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: BenAdmin
    • Labels:
      None
    • Environment:
      QA
    • Bug Type:
      Functional
    • Module:
      BenAdmin - Enrollment
    • Reported by:
      Harbinger
    • Sprint:
      WT Sprint 30 -Bugs, WT Sprint 33-Bugs

      Description

      LB
      LONG

      Refer the screen shot for Dependent Life Plan Cost and Coverage Customization [no contingency]

      • Set the EOI for New Hire Mode [0 for SP and 4000 for CH]
      • enrollment allowed for EE is No and for CH and SP it is set as Yes
      • log in with employee, enroll Ch with 5000 - this request will go in pending EOI - accept it with 5000 - hence approved and applied amounts for CH becomes 5000
      • now enroll in the same plan for SP with 25000 (applied amount is 25000 and approved is 0) - this will go on pending EOI
      • Reject this EOI request for SP

      Expected Result : Ideally system should cancel the SP enrollment - and retain the child enrollment with 5000 as it is
      Here system terminates CH enrollment too

      CC - Prasad Pise Sachin Hingole Rakesh Roy Hrishikesh Deshpande Hrishikesh Deshpande Jyoti Mayne Umesh Kadam Satya

        Attachments

        1. Cost and Coverage.png
          Cost and Coverage.png
          29 kB
        2. Issue.png
          Issue.png
          94 kB
        3. After rejecting SP Request.png
          After rejecting SP Request.png
          88 kB

          Issue Links

          relates to

          Bug - A problem which impairs or prevents the functions of the product. WT-9357 JCCC: Dependent Voluntary Life

          • Medium - Has the potential to affect progress.
          • Production Complete

            Activity

            Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) created issue -
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made changes -
            Field Original Value New Value
            Link This issue relates to WT-9357 [ WT-9357 ]
            satyap Satya made changes -
            Assignee Umesh Kadam [ umesh.kadam ] Rohit Shete [ rohit.shete ]
            Dev Due Date 13/Jun/2017
            Developer Rohit Shete [ rohit.shete ]
            satyap Satya made changes -
            Sprint WT Sprint 30 -Bugs [ 70 ]
            Permalink
            rohit.shete Rohit Shete (Inactive) logged work - 12/Jun/17 01:31 PM
            • Time Spent:
              3h
               

              Analysis And Debug And Discussion with Umesh

            rohit.shete Rohit Shete (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 4h [ 14400 ] 1h [ 3600 ]
            Time Spent 3h [ 10800 ]
            Worklog Id 54165 [ 54165 ]
            rohit.shete Rohit Shete (Inactive) made changes -
            Status Open [ 1 ] In Development [ 10007 ]
            rohit.shete Rohit Shete (Inactive) made changes -
            Original Estimate 4h [ 14400 ] 20h [ 72000 ]
            rohit.shete Rohit Shete (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Analysis(10204)
            Permalink
            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) logged work - 12/Jun/17 04:30 PM
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               

              Discussion with Rohit

            rohit.shete Rohit Shete (Inactive) made changes -
            Dev Due Date 13/Jun/2017 14/Jun/2017
            Permalink
            rohit.shete Rohit Shete (Inactive) logged work - 13/Jun/17 12:41 PM
            • Time Spent:
              3h
               

              analysis, debug and discussion

            rohit.shete Rohit Shete (Inactive) made changes -
            Remaining Estimate 1h [ 3600 ] 0h [ 0 ]
            Time Spent 3h [ 10800 ] 6h [ 21600 ]
            Worklog Id 54616 [ 54616 ]
            rohit.shete Rohit Shete (Inactive) made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Analysis(10204) Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Progress(10206)
            rohit.shete Rohit Shete (Inactive) made changes -
            Dev Due Date 14/Jun/2017 15/Jun/2017
            Permalink
            rohit.shete Rohit Shete (Inactive) logged work - 15/Jun/17 12:27 PM
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               

              discussion with alankar and analsysis

            rohit.shete Rohit Shete (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 6h [ 21600 ] 6.5h [ 23400 ]
            Worklog Id 55491 [ 55491 ]
            Hide
            Permalink
            rohit.shete Rohit Shete (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Alankar Chavan

            We discussed this issue with satya, this is system behavior not a bug.

            Please Check and Confirm.

            Thanks And Regards
            Rohit Shete.

            CC:Satya, Jyoti Mayne

            Show
            rohit.shete Rohit Shete (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Alankar Chavan We discussed this issue with satya, this is system behavior not a bug. Please Check and Confirm. Thanks And Regards Rohit Shete. CC: Satya , Jyoti Mayne
            rohit.shete Rohit Shete (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Rohit Shete [ rohit.shete ] Alankar Chavan [ alankar.chavan ]
            Resolution System Behaviour [ 10100 ]
            Status In Development [ 10007 ] Rejected [ 10004 ]
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Progress(10206) Parent values: Development(10200)
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)
            Permalink
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne logged work - 15/Jun/17 03:07 PM - edited
            • Time Spent:
              0.5h
               

              discussion

            Hide
            Permalink
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hello Satya,

            Though its as per the current implementation, This is a Bug in our system.
            Its another Valid Scenario where the client has found a bug WT-9357

            We can discuss about this. Lets keep this bug open and schedule it once we have bandwidth.

            CC - Rakesh Roy Samir Prasad Pise Sachin Hingole Hrishikesh Deshpande Jyoti Mayne

            Show
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) added a comment - Hello Satya , Though its as per the current implementation, This is a Bug in our system. Its another Valid Scenario where the client has found a bug WT-9357 We can discuss about this. Lets keep this bug open and schedule it once we have bandwidth. CC - Rakesh Roy Samir Prasad Pise Sachin Hingole Hrishikesh Deshpande Jyoti Mayne
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made changes -
            Resolution System Behaviour [ 10100 ] Unresolved [ 10200 ]
            Status Rejected [ 10004 ] Reopened [ 4 ]
            alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Alankar Chavan [ alankar.chavan ] Satya [ ID10004 ]
            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 6.5h [ 23400 ] 7h [ 25200 ]
            Worklog Id 58732 [ 58732 ]
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
            Time Spent 7h [ 25200 ] 7.25h [ 26100 ]
            Worklog Id 58923 [ 58923 ]
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
            Time Spent 7.25h [ 26100 ] 7.5h [ 27000 ]
            Worklog Id 58923 [ 58923 ]
            satyap Satya made changes -
            Status Reopened [ 4 ] In Development [ 10007 ]
            satyap Satya made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Analysis(10204)
            Hide
            Permalink
            satyap Satya added a comment -

            Discussed this scenario with Alankar Chavan & Amruta Lohiya.

            Since this scenario exists on JCCC, we should be taking this for implementation. Will schedule after completing client reported bugs.

            Regards,
            Satya Prakash

            Cc: Jyoti Mayne Vijay Siddha Rakesh Roy

            Show
            satyap Satya added a comment - Discussed this scenario with Alankar Chavan & Amruta Lohiya . Since this scenario exists on JCCC, we should be taking this for implementation. Will schedule after completing client reported bugs. Regards, Satya Prakash Cc: Jyoti Mayne Vijay Siddha Rakesh Roy
            satyap Satya made changes -
            Assignee Satya [ ID10004 ] Jyoti Mayne [ jyoti.mayne ]
            satyap Satya made changes -
            Dev Due Date 15/Jun/2017
            vijays Vijay Siddha (Inactive) made changes -
            Sprint WT Sprint 30 -Bugs [ 70 ] WT Sprint 30 -Bugs, WT Sprint 33-Bugs [ 70, 77 ]
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
            Dev Due Date 19/Jul/2017
            Permalink
            rohit.shete Rohit Shete (Inactive) logged work - 17/Jul/17 12:19 PM
            • Time Spent:
              5.75h
               

              Analysis, discussion and unit testing

            rohit.shete Rohit Shete (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 7.5h [ 27000 ] 13.25h [ 47700 ]
            Worklog Id 63941 [ 63941 ]
            rohit.shete Rohit Shete (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Jyoti Mayne [ jyoti.mayne ] Rohit Shete [ rohit.shete ]
            rohit.shete Rohit Shete (Inactive) made changes -
            Dev Due Date 19/Jul/2017 18/Jul/2017
            Hide
            Permalink
            rohit.shete Rohit Shete (Inactive) added a comment -

            Hi Alankar Chavan,

            As per discussion with Amit Thorve, Satya and Amruta Lohiya, ideal customization for such kind of issue is to create separate benefit for each dependent.

            Earlier Amit Thorve and EDI team had discussion regarding same issue as such enrollments were not exported on a file. EDI doesn't have facility to export such enrollments on a file. Hence they come up with solution to have separate benefit for each dependent which is the best practice.

            Thanks and Regards,
            Rohit Shete

            CC : Amit Thorve, Satya, Amruta Lohiya, Jyoti Mayne, Umesh Kadam

            Show
            rohit.shete Rohit Shete (Inactive) added a comment - Hi Alankar Chavan , As per discussion with Amit Thorve , Satya and Amruta Lohiya , ideal customization for such kind of issue is to create separate benefit for each dependent. Earlier Amit Thorve and EDI team had discussion regarding same issue as such enrollments were not exported on a file. EDI doesn't have facility to export such enrollments on a file. Hence they come up with solution to have separate benefit for each dependent which is the best practice. Thanks and Regards, Rohit Shete CC : Amit Thorve , Satya , Amruta Lohiya , Jyoti Mayne , Umesh Kadam
            rohit.shete Rohit Shete (Inactive) made changes -
            Assignee Rohit Shete [ rohit.shete ] Alankar Chavan [ alankar.chavan ]
            Resolution Unresolved [ 10200 ] System Behaviour [ 10100 ]
            Status In Development [ 10007 ] Rejected [ 10004 ]
            Permalink
            rohit.shete Rohit Shete (Inactive) logged work - 18/Jul/17 12:09 PM - edited
            • Time Spent:
              5h
               

              Discussion with amit,satya,amruta,umesh, analysis and scenario analysis

            rohit.shete Rohit Shete (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 13.25h [ 47700 ] 17.25h [ 62100 ]
            Worklog Id 64269 [ 64269 ]
            rohit.shete Rohit Shete (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 17.25h [ 62100 ] 18.25h [ 65700 ]
            Worklog Id 64269 [ 64269 ]
            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) made changes -
            Time Spent 18.25h [ 65700 ] 20.25h [ 72900 ]
            Worklog Id 64396 [ 64396 ]
            Permalink
            umesh.kadam Umesh Kadam (Inactive) logged work - 18/Jul/17 04:30 PM
            • Time Spent:
              2h
               

              Discussion with Amit Thorve, Amruta, Satya regarding best practices and code change
              Scenario discussion and data verification with Rohit & Amruta

            satyap Satya made changes -
            Environment_New LB [ 18444 ]
            jyoti.mayne Jyoti Mayne made changes -
            Item State Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Analysis(10204)
            Transition Time In Source Status Execution Times
            Rohit Shete (Inactive) made transition -
            Open In Development
            		14d 2h 52m 1
            Alankar Chavan (Inactive) made transition -
            Rejected Reopen
            		18h 14m 1
            Satya made transition -
            Reopen In Development
            		12d 22h 43m 1
            Rohit Shete (Inactive) made transition -
            In Development Rejected
            		22d 3h 21m 2

              People

              Assignee:
              alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive)
              Reporter:
              alankar.chavan Alankar Chavan (Inactive)
              Developer:
              Rohit Shete (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              3 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:
                Dev Due Date:

                  Time Tracking

                  Estimated:
                  Original Estimate - 20h Original Estimate - 20h
                  20h
                  Remaining:
                  Remaining Estimate - 0h
                  0h
                  Logged:
                  Time Spent - 20.25h
                  20.25h