-
Type:
Support Activity
-
Status: Resolved
-
Priority:
High
-
Resolution: Done
-
Affects Version/s: None
-
Fix Version/s: None
-
Component/s: UI Refresh
-
Labels:None
-
Environment:Pre Production
-
Module:BenAdmin - Enrollment
-
Reported by:Harbinger
-
Company:All Clients/Multiple Clients
-
Severity:Simple
(Mail on 11/27/2017)
During scanning for wrong criteria present in Generic Eligibility Rules, we have found following 13 companies. Please do not consider/use these companies for testing in PREPROD environment.
| Company Name |
|---|
| CVHP |
| Barrow |
| CEI |
| Prime Healthcare |
| Clarke |
| JE Dunn |
| City of Casselberry |
| Innovative Building Systems |
| US Shale |
| Michael Best Benefits |
| City of Bellevue |
| Wacker Neuson Corporation |
| TIBCO |
CC : Nidhi Kaul, Rakesh Roy, Vijayendra Shinde, Amruta Lohiya, Rohan J Khandave, Jyoti Mayne, Sachin Hingole
- is duplicated by
-
NF-5239 Prime Healthcare -> Pre- prod -> Selecting employee throws error
-
- Closed
-
- relates to
-
-
- Open
-
-
-
- Stage Testing
-
-
-
- Production Complete
-
-
-
- Closed
-
We have done correction of generic eligibility rules on following companies. You can use/consider these companies for testing.
- CEI
- Innovative Building Systems
- City of Bellevue
Please find below 3Cs for these companies
| Concern | Wrong generic eligibility criteria present |
| Cause | Historic data of "Currency And Date Format Rule" was present in additional criteria for defaulter generic eligibility rules. Hence while migrating eligibility rules, system picked up those wrong values in eligibility criteria. |
| Correction | We have corrected defaulter Generic Eligibility Rules as per their customization in PROD environment. |
We have done correction of generic eligibility rules on following companies. You can use/consider these companies for testing.
- CVHP
Please find below 3Cs for this company
| Concern | Wrong generic eligibility criteria present |
| Cause | While saving addition criteria of Spouse Enrolled In macro, plan name was saved instead of its ID |
| Correction | Code fix for this issue has been done under We have corrected affected eligibility rules for CVHP in PREPROD |
We have done correction of generic eligibility rules on following companies. You can use/consider these companies for testing.
- Prime Healthcare
Please find below 3Cs for this company
| Concern | Wrong generic eligibility criteria present |
| Cause | Bracket was missing in beginning of the additional criteria (same issue is present in PROD) hence while generating eligibility rule during migration wrong criteria was generated |
| Correction | We have corrected affected eligibility rules for Prime Healthcare in PREPROD as per current criteria present in PROD |
We have done correction of generic eligibility rules on following companies. You can use/consider these companies for testing.
- JE Dunn
Please find below 3Cs for this company
| Concern | Wrong generic eligibility criteria present |
| Cause | Historic data was present in additional criteria for defaulter generic eligibility rule. Hence while migrating eligibility rules, system picked up those wrong criteria. |
| Correction | We have corrected defaulter Generic Eligibility Rules as per their customization in PROD environment. |
We have done correction of generic eligibility rules on following companies. You can use/consider these companies for testing.
- City of Casselberry
- US Shale
- Michael Best Benefits
- Wacker Neuson Corporation
- TIBCO
- PrimeHealthcare
Please find below 3Cs for this company
| Concern | Wrong generic eligibility criteria present |
| Cause | Historic data was present in additional criteria for defaulter generic eligibility rule. Hence while migrating eligibility rules, system picked up those wrong criteria. |
| Correction | We have corrected defaulter Generic Eligibility Rules as per their customization in PROD environment. |
As discussed with Amruta, Sub-Plan Design ID can be used as parameter for generic eligibility criteria.
Hence following companies doesn't require correction for generic eligibility rules. We have verified other rules for these companies and all are looking good. You can also use/consider these companies for testing.