-
Type:
Enhancement
-
Status: Production Complete
-
Priority:
High
-
Resolution: Done
-
Affects Version/s: None
-
Fix Version/s: None
-
Component/s: BenAdmin
-
Labels:None
-
Module:BenAdmin - Enrollment
-
Reported by:Support
-
Item State:Production Complete - Closed
-
Issue Importance:Must have Additional
-
Sprint:WT Sprint 23
This might be apply for screens like Terminate Election, terminate as never effective, terminate dependent's benefit
Here we want to notify an user - with which actual dates the elections are going to get terminated after he puts the termination dates.
Example - the termination rule is set as End of Month
User terminates an election with date 15th May 2016 - before the actual termination system should notify an user these changes are going to be effective from 31st May 2016
After this user can click on cancel or go further with the termination
This is as per the Dave's suggestion
- is blocked by
-
WT-8435 Server Error on Enroll now page
-
- Production Complete
-
- relates to
-
-
- Production Complete
-
-
-
- Closed
-
-
-
- Production Complete
-
-
-
- Production Complete
-
-
-
- Closed
-
-
WT-8487 Plan termination fail during termination of election
-
- Closed
-
| Field | Original Value | New Value |
|---|---|---|
| Description |
This might be apply for screens like Terminate Election, terminate as never effective, terminate dependent's benefit Here we want to notify an user - with which actual dates the elections are going to get terminated after he puts the termination dates. Example - the termination rule is set as End of Month User terminates an election with date 15th May 2016 - before the actual termination system should notify an user these changes are going to be effective from 31st May 2016 After this user can click on cancel or go further with the termination |
This might be apply for screens like Terminate Election, terminate as never effective, terminate dependent's benefit Here we want to notify an user - with which actual dates the elections are going to get terminated after he puts the termination dates. Example - the termination rule is set as End of Month User terminates an election with date 15th May 2016 - before the actual termination system should notify an user these changes are going to be effective from 31st May 2016 After this user can click on cancel or go further with the termination This is as per the Dave's suggestion |
| Assignee | Satya [ ID10004 ] | Amnesh Goel [ amnesh.goel ] |
| Sprint | Must have Enhancements-Add [ 15 ] |
| Rank | Ranked lower |
| Issue Importance | Must Have [ 11800 ] | Must have Additional [ 12201 ] |
| Assignee | Amnesh Goel [ amnesh.goel ] | Satya [ ID10004 ] |
| Assignee | Satya [ ID10004 ] | Amruta Lohiya [ amruta.baheti ] |
| Sprint | Must have Enhancements-Add [ 15 ] | Must have Add-Backlog [ 22 ] |
| Rank | Ranked higher |
| Item State | Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Development Backlog(10205) |
Amruta Lohiya
made changes -
| Assignee | Amruta Lohiya [ amruta.baheti ] | Umesh Kadam [ umesh.kadam ] |
| Sprint | Must have Add-Backlog [ 22 ] | Must Have Enhancements [ 10 ] |
| Rank | Ranked lower |
| Sprint | Must Have Oct-Dec [ 10 ] | WT Sprint 19 [ 35 ] |
| Rank | Ranked lower |
| Status | New Request [ 10029 ] | Pending for Approval [ 10002 ] |
| Status | Pending for Approval [ 10002 ] | Approved for Development [ 10003 ] |
| Item State | Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Development Backlog(10205) | Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Analysis(10204) |
| Assignee | Umesh Kadam [ umesh.kadam ] | Harshawardhan Phalake [ harshawardhan ] |
| Developer | Harshawardhan Phalake [ harshawardhan ] |
| Remaining Estimate | 55h [ 198000 ] | |
| Original Estimate | 55h [ 198000 ] |
| Remaining Estimate | 55h [ 198000 ] | 54.5h [ 196200 ] |
| Time Spent | 0.5h [ 1800 ] | |
| Worklog Id | 14460 [ 14460 ] |
| Original Estimate | 55h [ 198000 ] | 65h [ 234000 ] |
-
- Time Spent:
- 0.5h
-
Design team meeting
| Remaining Estimate | 54.5h [ 196200 ] | 54h [ 194400 ] |
| Time Spent | 0.5h [ 1800 ] | 1h [ 3600 ] |
| Worklog Id | 14547 [ 14547 ] |
-
- Time Spent:
- 6h
-
Analysis for the employee plan termination election
| Remaining Estimate | 54h [ 194400 ] | 48h [ 172800 ] |
| Time Spent | 1h [ 3600 ] | 7h [ 25200 ] |
| Worklog Id | 14549 [ 14549 ] |
-
- Time Spent:
- 1h
-
design team meeting
| Remaining Estimate | 48h [ 172800 ] | 47h [ 169200 ] |
| Time Spent | 7h [ 25200 ] | 8h [ 28800 ] |
| Worklog Id | 14558 [ 14558 ] |
| Remaining Estimate | 47h [ 169200 ] | 46.5h [ 167400 ] |
| Time Spent | 8h [ 28800 ] | 8.5h [ 30600 ] |
| Worklog Id | 14577 [ 14577 ] |
| Remaining Estimate | 46.5h [ 167400 ] | 45.5h [ 163800 ] |
| Time Spent | 8.5h [ 30600 ] | 9.5h [ 34200 ] |
| Worklog Id | 14581 [ 14581 ] |
| Remaining Estimate | 45.5h [ 163800 ] | 43h [ 154800 ] |
| Time Spent | 9.5h [ 34200 ] | 12h [ 43200 ] |
| Worklog Id | 14601 [ 14601 ] |
-
- Time Spent:
- 1h
-
design team meeting and discussion with harsh
| Remaining Estimate | 43h [ 154800 ] | 42h [ 151200 ] |
| Time Spent | 12h [ 43200 ] | 13h [ 46800 ] |
| Worklog Id | 14615 [ 14615 ] |
-
- Time Spent:
- 0.5h
-
Design team meeting
| Code Review Date | 27/Dec/2016 | |
| Code Reviewed By | Jyoti Mayne [ 11910 ] | |
| Dev Due Date | 28/Dec/2016 | |
| Dev Estimates | 45 |
| Remaining Estimate | 42h [ 151200 ] | 39h [ 140400 ] |
| Time Spent | 13h [ 46800 ] | 16h [ 57600 ] |
| Worklog Id | 14834 [ 14834 ] |
| Remaining Estimate | 39h [ 140400 ] | 35h [ 126000 ] |
| Time Spent | 16h [ 57600 ] | 20h [ 72000 ] |
| Worklog Id | 14835 [ 14835 ] |
| Remaining Estimate | 35h [ 126000 ] | 34.5h [ 124200 ] |
| Time Spent | 20h [ 72000 ] | 20.5h [ 73800 ] |
| Worklog Id | 14880 [ 14880 ] |
| QA | Hrishikesh Deshpande [ hrishikesh.deshpande ] |
| Remaining Estimate | 34.5h [ 124200 ] | 27.5h [ 99000 ] |
| Time Spent | 20.5h [ 73800 ] | 27.5h [ 99000 ] |
| Worklog Id | 15094 [ 15094 ] |
| Remaining Estimate | 27.5h [ 99000 ] | 21.5h [ 77400 ] |
| Time Spent | 27.5h [ 99000 ] | 33.5h [ 120600 ] |
| Worklog Id | 15306 [ 15306 ] |
-
- Time Spent:
- 6h
-
coding and functionality review
| Remaining Estimate | 21.5h [ 77400 ] | 15.5h [ 55800 ] |
| Time Spent | 33.5h [ 120600 ] | 39.5h [ 142200 ] |
| Worklog Id | 15643 [ 15643 ] |
| Remaining Estimate | 15.5h [ 55800 ] | 15h [ 54000 ] |
| Time Spent | 39.5h [ 142200 ] | 40h [ 144000 ] |
| Worklog Id | 15669 [ 15669 ] |
-
- Time Spent:
- 3h
-
Code review and testing
| Remaining Estimate | 15h [ 54000 ] | 12h [ 43200 ] |
| Time Spent | 40h [ 144000 ] | 43h [ 154800 ] |
| Worklog Id | 15771 [ 15771 ] |
| Status | Approved for Development [ 10003 ] | In Development [ 10007 ] |
| Item State | Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Analysis(10204) | Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Local Testing(10209) |
-
- Time Spent:
- 3h
-
Code checkin and review and coding
| Remaining Estimate | 12h [ 43200 ] | 9h [ 32400 ] |
| Time Spent | 43h [ 154800 ] | 46h [ 165600 ] |
| Worklog Id | 16009 [ 16009 ] |
-
- Time Spent:
- 1h
-
code change suggested in code review
| Remaining Estimate | 9h [ 32400 ] | 8h [ 28800 ] |
| Time Spent | 46h [ 165600 ] | 47h [ 169200 ] |
| Worklog Id | 16010 [ 16010 ] |
Khandu Kshirsagar (Inactive)
made changes -
| Item State | Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Local Testing(10209) | Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600) |
Hi Alankar Chavan,
As per discussion in design team meeting we have done the code changes for the Election termination screen.
We have added new column in greed Actual Termination Date and on termination date change event we have show the Actual term date for the election as per the plan and company level policy.
Impacted areas to be tested.
1. Terminate plan election
2. Terminate Dependent Benefit
3. Terminate as never effective
All three screen need to be tested properly as validation for Terminate plan election is not present on Terminate Dependent Benefit we also done those changes as well.
Known issue:
On production for for screen Terminate Dependent Benefit multiple election date termination is not working we are creating separate JIRA for the same.
Please revert if you need any help to understand the scenario.
Thanks,
Harshawardhan.
CC: Jyoti Mayne
| Assignee | Harshawardhan Phalake [ harshawardhan ] | Alankar Chavan [ alankar.chavan ] |
Known issue on production.
-
- Time Spent:
- 3h
-
Code changes LB check-in and unit testing
| Remaining Estimate | 8h [ 28800 ] | 5h [ 18000 ] |
| Time Spent | 47h [ 169200 ] | 50h [ 180000 ] |
| Worklog Id | 16154 [ 16154 ] |
| Status | In Development [ 10007 ] | Local Testing [ 10200 ] |
| Remaining Estimate | 5h [ 18000 ] | 4h [ 14400 ] |
| Time Spent | 50h [ 180000 ] | 51h [ 183600 ] |
| Worklog Id | 16410 [ 16410 ] |
-
- Time Spent:
- 0.5h
-
Analysis of this enhancement
| Remaining Estimate | 4h [ 14400 ] | 3.5h [ 12600 ] |
| Time Spent | 51h [ 183600 ] | 51.5h [ 185400 ] |
| Worklog Id | 16447 [ 16447 ] |
-
- Time Spent:
- 1h
-
discussion and code checkin
| Remaining Estimate | 3.5h [ 12600 ] | 2.5h [ 9000 ] |
| Time Spent | 51.5h [ 185400 ] | 52.5h [ 189000 ] |
| Worklog Id | 16477 [ 16477 ] |
-
- Time Spent:
- 3.5h
-
Analysis
Started Test Case Writting
| Remaining Estimate | 2.5h [ 9000 ] | 0h [ 0 ] |
| Time Spent | 52.5h [ 189000 ] | 56h [ 201600 ] |
| Worklog Id | 16694 [ 16694 ] |
Attaching the Test Cases related to this enhancement - 03rd Jan 2016
CC - Rakesh Roy Prasad Pise Hrishikesh Deshpande Sachin Hingole Jayshree Nagpure
| Attachment | Election Termination Enhancement Test Cases.xls [ 36446 ] |
| Assignee | Alankar Chavan [ alankar.chavan ] | Jayshree Nagpure [ jayshree.nagpure ] |
As discussed, please start execution of the task and revert in case of any queries.
Thanks
- Prasad
-
- Time Spent:
- 1h
-
Task Analysis and team discussion for understanding.
| Time Spent | 56h [ 201600 ] | 57h [ 205200 ] |
| Worklog Id | 16893 [ 16893 ] |
Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
logged work - 03/Jan/17 12:54 PM -
- Time Spent:
- 1h
-
Team Discussion for task understanding
Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
made changes -
| Time Spent | 57h [ 205200 ] | 58h [ 208800 ] |
| Worklog Id | 16902 [ 16902 ] |
-
- Time Spent:
- 2.5h
-
test case writing
KT to Prasad and Jayshree
| Time Spent | 58h [ 208800 ] | 60.5h [ 217800 ] |
| Worklog Id | 16979 [ 16979 ] |
Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
logged work - 04/Jan/17 01:07 PM -
- Time Spent:
- 7.5h
-
Analysis and execution of test cases, Verification on LB.
Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
made changes -
| Time Spent | 60.5h [ 217800 ] | 68h [ 244800 ] |
| Worklog Id | 17177 [ 17177 ] |
-
- Time Spent:
- 2h
-
High level test execution and Queries discussion
| Time Spent | 68h [ 244800 ] | 70h [ 252000 ] |
| Worklog Id | 17218 [ 17218 ] |
Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
made changes -
| Item State | Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600) | Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213) |
Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
logged work - 05/Jan/17 01:33 PM -
- Time Spent:
- 0.5h
-
Updating of test cases and discussion with venkatesh
Hi,
Verification on LB is completed.
Working as Expected.
Thus updating item state as ready for stage.
Thanks,
Jayshree
CC; Alankar Chavan Prasad Pise Harshawardhan Phalake Rakesh Roy
Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
added a comment - Hi,
Verification on LB is completed.
Working as Expected.
Thus updating item state as ready for stage.
Thanks,
Jayshree
CC; Alankar Chavan Prasad Pise Harshawardhan Phalake Rakesh Roy Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
made changes -
| Attachment | Updated-Election Termination Enhancement Test Cases.xls [ 36720 ] |
Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
made changes -
| Time Spent | 70h [ 252000 ] | 70.5h [ 253800 ] |
| Worklog Id | 17561 [ 17561 ] |
Khandu Kshirsagar (Inactive)
made changes -
| Item State | Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213) | Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602) |
Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
made changes -
| Attachment | dependent termination.png [ 36883 ] |
Hi,
Verification on Stage is done.
While verifying i have encountered an issue on stage in "Terminate Dependent benefits".
After Selecting termination date, In Actual termination date column its showing "<!DOCTYPE" instead of actual termination date.
Please refer attached screen shot: 
Thanks,
Jayshree
CC; Alankar Chavan Prasad Pise Harshawardhan Phalake Rakesh Roy
Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
added a comment - Hi,
Verification on Stage is done.
While verifying i have encountered an issue on stage in "Terminate Dependent benefits".
After Selecting termination date, In Actual termination date column its showing "<!DOCTYPE" instead of actual termination date.
Please refer attached screen shot:
Thanks,
Jayshree
CC; Alankar Chavan Prasad Pise Harshawardhan Phalake Rakesh Roy
Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
made changes -
| Item State | Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602) | Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Re-open(10216) |
Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
logged work - 09/Jan/17 11:54 AM -
- Time Spent:
- 3.5h
-
Verification on stage.
Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
made changes -
| Time Spent | 70.5h [ 253800 ] | 74h [ 266400 ] |
| Worklog Id | 18033 [ 18033 ] |
-
- Time Spent:
- 0.5h
-
Discussion with Hrishikes
| Time Spent | 74h [ 266400 ] | 74.5h [ 268200 ] |
| Worklog Id | 18127 [ 18127 ] |
Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
made changes -
| Assignee | Jayshree Nagpure [ jayshree.nagpure ] | Harshawardhan Phalake [ harshawardhan ] |
Hi Jayshree Nagpure,
Above issue is caused due to page lave access.
Please find the bellow 3c's for the issue:
*Concern : * Actual termination date column its showing "<!DOCTYPE" instead of actual termination date.
Cause : As on stage page level access in on because of that need to make entry in Page level access table for the new action.
Correction : We have write a script for the page level access for this particular action.
Thanks,
Harshawardahn.
-
- Time Spent:
- 2h
-
script generation and analysis for issue
| Time Spent | 74.5h [ 268200 ] | 76.5h [ 275400 ] |
| Worklog Id | 18335 [ 18335 ] |
| Assignee | Harshawardhan Phalake [ harshawardhan ] | Jyoti Mayne [ jyoti.mayne ] |
| Status | Local Testing [ 10200 ] | Reopen in Local [ 10018 ] |
| Status | Reopen in Local [ 10018 ] | In Development [ 10007 ] |
| Time Spent | 76.5h [ 275400 ] | 76.75h [ 276300 ] |
| Worklog Id | 21358 [ 21358 ] |
| Item State | Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Re-open(10216) | Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Progress(10206) |
| Assignee | Jyoti Mayne [ jyoti.mayne ] | Umesh Kadam [ umesh.kadam ] |
| Item State | Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: In Progress(10206) | Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600) |
| Assignee | Umesh Kadam [ umesh.kadam ] | Alankar Chavan [ alankar.chavan ] |
| Assignee | Alankar Chavan [ alankar.chavan ] | Jayshree Nagpure [ jayshree.nagpure ] |
Vijay Siddha (Inactive)
made changes -
| Status | In Development [ 10007 ] | Local Testing [ 10200 ] |
Vijay Siddha (Inactive)
made changes -
| Sprint | WT Sprint 19 [ 35 ] | WT Sprint 23 [ 43 ] |
Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
made changes -
| Item State | Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600) | Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210) |
Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
made changes -
| Attachment | CompanyInformationTerminationdate.jpg [ 39573 ] | |
| Attachment | PlanDesignTerminationDate.jpg [ 39574 ] | |
| Attachment | PlanTerminationScreen.jpg [ 39575 ] |
Hi Umesh Kadam,
Verified this enhancement on Caiso on LB.
Plan name: Anthem HDHP
While terminating plan, Termination date is to be set and In Actual termination date its showing date as per rule set in company information, But terminating plan according to plan design.
But it should display date of termination on screen as per plan design only when plan is terminating as per plan design rule.
Hence as discussed with Alankar Chavan Re-opening this enhancement.
Please refer Attached ScreenShots: 
Thanks,
Jayshree
Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
added a comment - Hi Umesh Kadam ,
Verified this enhancement on Caiso on LB.
Plan name: Anthem HDHP
While terminating plan, Termination date is to be set and In Actual termination date its showing date as per rule set in company information, But terminating plan according to plan design.
But it should display date of termination on screen as per plan design only when plan is terminating as per plan design rule.
Hence as discussed with Alankar Chavan Re-opening this enhancement.
Please refer Attached ScreenShots:
Thanks,
Jayshree
CC: Alankar Chavan Prasad Pise Rakesh Roy
Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
made changes -
| Item State | Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: In Testing(10210) | Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Re-open(10212) |
Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
made changes -
| Status | Local Testing [ 10200 ] | Reopen in Local [ 10018 ] |
Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
made changes -
| Assignee | Jayshree Nagpure [ jayshree.nagpure ] | Umesh Kadam [ umesh.kadam ] |
| Status | Reopen in Local [ 10018 ] | In Development [ 10007 ] |
| Item State | Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Re-open(10212) | Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Local Testing(10209) |
Hi Jayshree Nagpure,
Please find 3Cs below
| Concern | While terminating plan, termination date is to be set in 'Actual Termination Date' column is showing as per company level rule but terminating election according to plan level termination date rule |
| Cause | While getting termination date for 'Actual Termination Date' column, EnrollmentID were passed instead of PlanDesignID |
| Correction | Required code change has been done and committed to LB branch. Please test once it is deployed to LB |
Thanks and Regards,
:: Umesh Kadam
CC : Jyoti Mayne
| Assignee | Umesh Kadam [ umesh.kadam ] | Jayshree Nagpure [ jayshree.nagpure ] |
| Item State | Parent values: Development(10200)Level 1 values: Ready for Local Testing(10209) | Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600) |
-
- Time Spent:
- 4.5h
-
Re-testing on Lb and issues discussion with alankar
Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
made changes -
| Time Spent | 76.75h [ 276300 ] | 80.75h [ 290700 ] |
| Worklog Id | 24654 [ 24654 ] |
-
- Time Spent:
- 1h
-
Debugged code for reported issue (LB re-opened)
Code correction done for reported issue
LB code commit
Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
made changes -
Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
added a comment - CC; Prasad Pise Alankar Chavan Rakesh Roy Hi,
Verified this enhancement on LB on JCCC,Caiso
Verified for Three scenarios:
1. Terminate plan election
2. Terminate Dependent Benefit
3. Terminate as never effective
For Plan level and company level
System actually terminate the election with the termination date shown in Actual Termination Date column.
Working as expected.
Thus Updating item state as ready for Stage.
Thanks,
Jayshree
Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
added a comment - Hi,
Verified this enhancement on LB on JCCC,Caiso
Verified for Three scenarios:
1. Terminate plan election
2. Terminate Dependent Benefit
3. Terminate as never effective
For Plan level and company level
System actually terminate the election with the termination date shown in Actual Termination Date column.
Working as expected.
Thus Updating item state as ready for Stage.
Thanks,
Jayshree
CC: Umesh Kadam Jyoti Mayne
Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
made changes -
| Item State | Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: LB Deployed(11600) | Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213) |
| Time Spent | 80.75h [ 290700 ] | 81h 5m [ 291900 ] |
| Worklog Id | 25111 [ 25111 ] |
| Time Spent | 81h 5m [ 291900 ] | 81.25h [ 292500 ] |
| Worklog Id | 25111 [ 25111 ] |
| Time Spent | 81.25h [ 292500 ] | 82.25h [ 296100 ] |
| Worklog Id | 25115 [ 25115 ] |
Khandu Kshirsagar (Inactive)
made changes -
| Item State | Parent values: LB QA(10201)Level 1 values: Ready for Stage(10213) | Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602) |
Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
made changes -
| Item State | Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Stage Deployed(11602) | Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: In Testing(10214) |
Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
made changes -
| Status | In Development [ 10007 ] | Local Testing [ 10200 ] |
-
- Time Spent:
- 4h
-
Lb testing for remaining jira and then Stage testing after stage patch
Hi Umesh Kadam,
We have verified this enhancement on Stage on Caiso for HSPL.
Verified for three scenario's:
1)Terminate Election
2)Terminate as never effective
3)Terminate dependent's benefit
Elections are going to get terminated after user puts the termination dates.
Termination will be as per rules applied in Plan level if not then company level.
And if rule is applied in Plan level as well as company level it terminates the election as per plan level rule.
Working as expected.
Thus updating item state as Ready for Production
Thanks,
Jayshree
Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
added a comment - Hi Umesh Kadam ,
We have verified this enhancement on Stage on Caiso for HSPL.
Verified for three scenario's:
1)Terminate Election
2)Terminate as never effective
3)Terminate dependent's benefit
Elections are going to get terminated after user puts the termination dates.
Termination will be as per rules applied in Plan level if not then company level.
And if rule is applied in Plan level as well as company level it terminates the election as per plan level rule.
Working as expected.
Thus updating item state as Ready for Production
Thanks,
Jayshree
CC: Alankar Chavan Prasad Pise Rakesh Roy Jyoti Mayne Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
made changes -
| Item State | Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: In Testing(10214) | Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Ready for Production(10217) |
Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
made changes -
| Time Spent | 82.25h [ 296100 ] | 86.25h [ 310500 ] |
| Worklog Id | 25275 [ 25275 ] |
Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
made changes -
| Time Spent | 86.25h [ 310500 ] | 86.75h [ 312300 ] |
| Worklog Id | 24654 [ 24654 ] |
Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
made changes -
| Worklog Id | 25275 [ 25275 ] |
-
- Time Spent:
- 0.5h
-
Stage patch code commit for this ticket and its dependent tickets
Smoke test
Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
made changes -
| Status | Local Testing [ 10200 ] | Pending for Stage Approval [ 10300 ] |
| Status | Pending for Stage Approval [ 10300 ] | Approved for Stage [ 10030 ] |
| Status | Approved for Stage [ 10030 ] | Stage Testing [ 10201 ] |
| Status | Stage Testing [ 10201 ] | Pending for Production Approval [ 10301 ] |
| Status | Pending for Production Approval [ 10301 ] | Approved for production [ 10034 ] |
| Item State | Parent values: Stage QA(10202)Level 1 values: Ready for Production(10217) | Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: Production Deployed(10221) |
Hi Umesh Kadam,
Tested on Production for Austin for hspl,Long for hspl.
No dates are showing in Actual termination date column And Cannot terminate Plan.
Hence Re-opening this jira.
Thanks,
Jayshree
Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
added a comment - Hi Umesh Kadam ,
Tested on Production for Austin for hspl,Long for hspl.
No dates are showing in Actual termination date column And Cannot terminate Plan.
Hence Re-opening this jira.
Thanks,
Jayshree
CC; Alankar Chavan Prasad Pise Rakesh Roy Jyoti Mayne
Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
made changes -
| Item State | Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: Production Deployed(10221) | Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: Re-open(10220) |
Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
made changes -
| Status | Approved for production [ 10034 ] | Production Testing [ 10202 ] |
Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
made changes -
| Status | Production Testing [ 10202 ] | Reopen in Production [ 10027 ] |
Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
made changes -
| Assignee | Jayshree Nagpure [ jayshree.nagpure ] | Umesh Kadam [ umesh.kadam ] |
Hi Jayshree Nagpure,
Please find 3Cs below.
| Concern | No dates are showing in Actual termination date column And Cannot terminate Plan |
| Cause | Javascript required to convert datetime object in correct format was missing in production and hence it was throwing javascript error |
| Correction | We have deployed required Javascript in production and it is working fine now. Please check and confirm |
Thanks and Regards,
:: Umesh Kadam
| Assignee | Umesh Kadam [ umesh.kadam ] | Jayshree Nagpure [ jayshree.nagpure ] |
| Item State | Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: Re-open(10220) | Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: Production Deployed(10221) |
Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
made changes -
| Item State | Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: Production Deployed(10221) | Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: In Testing(10218) |
| Status | Reopen in Production [ 10027 ] | In Development [ 10007 ] |
| Status | In Development [ 10007 ] | Local Testing [ 10200 ] |
| Status | Local Testing [ 10200 ] | Pending for Stage Approval [ 10300 ] |
| Status | Pending for Stage Approval [ 10300 ] | Approved for Stage [ 10030 ] |
| Status | Approved for Stage [ 10030 ] | Stage Testing [ 10201 ] |
| Status | Stage Testing [ 10201 ] | Pending for Production Approval [ 10301 ] |
| Status | Pending for Production Approval [ 10301 ] | Approved for production [ 10034 ] |
| Status | Approved for production [ 10034 ] | Production Testing [ 10202 ] |
Hi Umesh Kadam,
Tested this enhancement on Production for long for hspl, austin for hspl.
Verified for three scenario's:
1)Terminate Election
2)Terminate as never effective
3)Terminate dependent's benefit
Elections are going to get terminated after user puts the termination dates.
Termination will be as per rules applied in Plan level if not then company level.
And if rule is applied in Plan level as well as company level it terminates the election as per plan level rule.
Working as expected.
Thus updating item state as Production complete.
Thanks,
Jayshree
Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
added a comment - Hi Umesh Kadam ,
Tested this enhancement on Production for long for hspl, austin for hspl.
Verified for three scenario's:
1)Terminate Election
2)Terminate as never effective
3)Terminate dependent's benefit
Elections are going to get terminated after user puts the termination dates.
Termination will be as per rules applied in Plan level if not then company level.
And if rule is applied in Plan level as well as company level it terminates the election as per plan level rule.
Working as expected.
Thus updating item state as Production complete.
Thanks,
Jayshree
CC: Jyoti Mayne Prasad Pise Alankar Chavan Rakesh Roy Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
made changes -
| Item State | Parent values: Production QA(10203)Level 1 values: In Testing(10218) | Parent values: Production Complete(10222)Level 1 values: Closed(10223) |
Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
made changes -
| Resolution | Fixed [ 1 ] | |
| Status | Production Testing [ 10202 ] | Production Complete [ 10028 ] |
-
- Time Spent:
- 4.5h
-
Production testing
Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
made changes -
| Time Spent | 86.75h [ 312300 ] | 90.75h [ 326700 ] |
| Worklog Id | 25920 [ 25920 ] |
Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
made changes -
| Time Spent | 90.75h [ 326700 ] | 91.25h [ 328500 ] |
| Worklog Id | 25920 [ 25920 ] |
-
- Time Spent:
- 3h
-
Production code commit for
WT-2437and all its dependent (skipped UK changes while merging)
Smoke test after Production deployment
Resolved Production deployment error for moment.js
Smoke test after another Production deployment
Shared details with QA team for all its dependent tickets
| Time Spent | 91.25h [ 328500 ] | 94.25h [ 339300 ] |
| Worklog Id | 26222 [ 26222 ] |
-
- Time Spent:
- 1h
-
Video Preparing on Join me
Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
made changes -
| Time Spent | 94.25h [ 339300 ] | 95.25h [ 342900 ] |
| Worklog Id | 28933 [ 28933 ] |
Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
made changes -
| Worklog Id | 28933 [ 28933 ] |
| Transition | Time In Source Status | Execution Times |
|---|
|
220d 30m | 1 |
|
8s | 1 |
|
8d 22h 7m | 1 |
Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
made transition
-
|
27d 20h 15m | 2 |
|
2h 45m | 2 |
Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
made transition
-
|
5s | 1 |
|
3h 7m | 1 |
|
21d 6h 57m | 4 |
|
1d 15h 14m | 2 |
|
6s | 2 |
|
7s | 2 |
|
22s | 2 |
|
8s | 2 |
|
4h 36m | 2 |
Jayshree Nagpure (Inactive)
made transition
-
|
38m 51s | 1 |
Hi Satya,
Please check this ticket.
Thanks,
Amnesh Goel